Trustee v. Delegate Model of Representation When in a political position‚ one is most generally tasked with difficult decisions that require a long‚ hard look at what really matters. There are two ways a person of this position can view a problem in order to make an informed decision. The trustee view model of representation allows the political position holder to have a broader view of what is important to society as a whole‚ while voting against narrow interests of constituents. This view also
Premium Political philosophy Decision making Cognition
beneficial to elect a delegate representative over a trustee. Along with being informed about the issues about the district in which they represent‚ a delegate representative will work to support the specific citizens in the district‚ where as a trustee representative may not. If a delegate is elected into office‚ citizens can be assured that their elected official will work to represent them and have their issues and concerns heard in the upper levels of government. Electing a delegate proves to make
Premium United States House of Representatives District Election
As of now‚ we only have two different democratic representation models: trustee and delegate. The trustee model says that representatives should be allowed to use their own judgment when deciding upon how they will vote on particular legislation. A trustee tries to lead his/her constituents‚ rather than follow them. Trustees are willing to run the risk of losing re-election if that means voting for the right thing‚ and I respect that. A delegate feels that the constituents are the ones in charge
Premium Management Leadership Democracy
In a democratic government‚ functions of representation can sometimes become skewed or misunderstood. I will examine the different institutions of government including the legislature‚ the executive‚ the bureaucracy‚ and the courts pointing to their differences in trustee vs. delegate functions of representation. My understanding of a trustee is that it is someone in a position of power deciding what is best without a direct mandate. In other words‚ someone who is carrying out the wishes of the
Premium Separation of powers Supreme Court of the United States Democracy
Full model vs. LASSO models After creating and evaluating the full model‚ a back model and step model were created using backwards selection and stepwise selection‚ respectively. Additionally‚ there were two LASSO models created. Both of these LASSO models were created using a weight of 4 (TPR) to 1 (FPR). Full Model 2 also has these weights‚ so we will use this model to compare to the LASSO models. The first LASSO model created was using “lambda 1SE.” This model was very minimal‚ only using 5
Premium Psychology Personality psychology Scientific method
Per Stephen Morse addictions can be broken down into two models. The medical model and the moral model‚ or moral failure. In general‚ the medical model of addiction puts forth that the cause of addiction has a biological‚ neurological‚ genetic or environmental cause‚ and that the resulting behaviors are a symptom of the disease‚ while the moral model ascribes that those behaviors are due to a moral failure. “Although no uncontroversial definition of addiction exists and “addiction” and “addict”
Premium Drug addiction Addiction Heroin
Biomedical model and biopsychological model are ways to identify an illness or disease. Biomedic is an approach when the mind and body are seen as separate entities mainly focusing on how to repair the body whereas biopsychological model sees the mind and body as interdependent entities meaning that they influence one another. They both focus on the body but when it comes to biopsychological model one factor is not enough to come to a conclusion. All of the three component which are biological‚
Premium Medicine Patient Health care
Medical Model The Medical Model of health tries to treat people through the use of medicine and science‚ and it doesn’t take into account the social and emotional factors of how the injury‚ illness‚ or disease was caused or brought on. It looks at the root cause of the problem‚ rather than telling the patient how it happened so they can avoid making the same mistake again e.g. If a Smoker contracts throat Cancer‚ if he’s not told it’s caused by smoking‚ they he wont know not to smoke again
Premium Medicine Health care Health
Similarly to the informative model‚ the interpretive model assumes that the physician is responsible for giving the patient with all important information concerning their state and treatment. However‚ the practitioner goes beyond providing the information and accepting the patient’s choices. Unlike the informative practitioner‚ the interpretive practitioner knows that the patient’s values are not completely recognized by the patient‚ in fact their values are often conflicting and underdeveloped
Premium Health care Patient Health care provider
Furthermore‚ the two models follow a similar timeline‚ yet in starkingly different ways. The NCC model splits into three steps of radicalization‚ mobilization‚ and action‚ essentially asserting that certain catalysts from personal and sociopolitical factors lead to preparation‚ and eventually action.1 It places all the factors into said three distinct nonlinear steps that work together dynamically in order to get to the final action. Overall‚ it seems to narrow in on physical‚ tangible items. Conversely
Premium Scientific method Cognition Psychology