| NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS et. al‚ Appellant v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS et. al‚ RespondentTHE SUPREME ULTIMATE OMNIPOTENT HANSON COURTJUDGES: Authored by Joseph Sims and Thomas Shellum with whom Chief Justice Jim Hanson concurs.March 1‚ 2012‚ FiledPRIOR HISTORY: Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District Nos: 11-393 &11-400. Date filed: August 12‚ 2011COUNSEL: For Appellant(s): Zachary Johnston‚ Salem Law Services‚ Salem‚ ORFor Respondent(s): Mitchell
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
Subashini Rajasingam v. Saravanan Thangathoray & Other Appeals [2008] 2 CLJ 1 FC Summary of the case: (4 marks) There were three appeals (02-19-2007(W)‚ 02-20-2007(W) and 02-21-2007(W)) before us and with the agreements of the parties‚ they were heard together. The parties to the three appeals were originally Hindus husband and wife; they were married pursuant to a civil ceremony of marriage that was registered on 26 July 2001 pursuant to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (the 1976
Premium Marriage Appeal
One of the first examples of Anglican reform during the English Reformation may be seen in the two ecclesiastical injunctions imposed by Thomas Cromwell in 1536 and 1538. The first injunction demanded that the clergy teach the Articles of Faith and the Ten Commandments to both their congregations and the children of the community. Parents were urged to either educate their children or apprentice them to occupations to lower crime and social disorder. Rich clerics were instructed to support scholars
Premium Christianity Catholic Church Protestant Reformation
Outline the development of common law and equity. A The Law in England didn’t come about all at once‚ but has developed over the centuries. There are 5 different sources of law: Customs‚ Judicial decision‚ Acts of Parliament‚ Delegated Legislation and‚ most recently‚ European Law. However‚ new law is still being created today. The law as we know it today all started in 1066‚ when William the Conqueror invaded England. He found a country with no single system of law‚ just sets of customary
Premium Common law
decision in the American Cyanamid case is a complete breakaway from the settled principles upon which an application for an interlocutory injunction is granted”. Critically examine this statement. An interlocutory injunction is an equitable remedy‚ which temporarily prohibits the defendant‚ from continuing a particular activity. The purpose of this injunction is to maintain the status quo or preserve the subject matter so that no permanent harm is done to the rights of the applicant before a court
Premium Jury Prima facie Trial
entitled to preliminary injunction‚ because LH is a trade secret under OUTSA. Preliminary injunctions should always be granted in case as like this‚ where there is a substantial likelihood that the plaintiffs will prevail on the merits. Vanguard Transp. Sys. V. Edwards Transfer & Storage Co. Gen. Commodities Div.‚ 673 N.E.2d 182. (184). The burden of proof to establish this element of a preliminary injunction motion is by showing clear and convincing evidence. Id. The injunction can remain in effect
Premium Patent Law United States
Facts surrounding the case: In 2012 Fox Broadcasting sued Dish Network for copyright infringement and breach of contract and filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin Dish from operating‚ distributing‚ selling‚ or offering Dish Anywhere‚ PrimeTime Anytime‚ AutoHop and any comparable features through the Hopper‚ a set-top box with digital video recorder(DVR) and video on demand capabilities. Dish Anytime allows consumers to view television content from their home set-top box with digital
Premium Copyright Copyright infringement
TO: Dr. Jian Cao‚ ACG Professor FROM: Andre Smith‚ MBA Candidate DATE: November 17‚ 2014 SUBJECT: BuyGasCo Case Analysis Introduction The BuyGasCo Corporation (BuyGasCo) case calls into question which costing approach is appropriate in determining whether or not BuyGasCo is guilty of predatory pricing. In determining BuyGasCo’s guilt‚ it should be noted that they have been historically known to provide low prices to its customers. BuyGasCo is a retail fuel and service chain center that has
Premium Cost Costs Cost-benefit analysis
of not to impose social injury”‚ there are two major points in explaining the difference‚ one is “affirmative duties”‚ that is actively do something good and the other is “negative injunction”‚ that is nothing to do bad (Simon‚ Powers‚ & Gunnemann‚ 1997‚ p. 62). Robbery could be an example‚ where a “negative injunction” could be that one person should not steal anything from the other whereas the “affirmative duty” could be the obligation made by the bystander when the action takes place to stop the
Premium Morality Business ethics Stakeholder theory
See Chapter 3 - Equal Employment Opportunity and Human Resources Management: Case Study 2: Misplaced Affections: Discharge for Sexual Harassment Peter Lewiston was terminated on July 15‚ 2008‚ by the governing board of the Pine Circle Unified School District (PCUSD) for violation of the district’s sexual harassment policy. Prior to Lewiston’s termination he was a senior maintenance employee with an above-average work record who had worked for the PCUSD for eleven years. He had been a widower since
Premium Sexual harassment Equal Employment Opportunity Commission High school