(2011) ‘Tweets about super-injunction footballer spike after attempts to gag Twitter’ [Online]‚ 22nd May. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/8528823/Tweets-about-super-injunction-footballer-spike-after-attempts-to-gag-Twitter.html. [Accessed 9th April 2012]. Background reading: Lamont‚ D. (2011) ‘Sex‚ lies and super-Injunctions’ [Online]‚ Chanel 4 News‚ 28th April. Available from: http://www.channel4.com/news/the-rise-of-the-super-injunction. [Accessed 9th April 2012].
Premium Newspaper Twitter Journalism
undergo the procedure needed to harvest the bone marrow. When Shimp refused‚ McFall sought an injunction to compel him to do so based on an out dated statute of an old English court which the current court is derived from. The court was faced with the question of whether or not an individual is under legal compulsion to give aid to save another. Judge John Flaherty denied the Plaintiff’s request for an injunction based upon our society’s fundamental belief in a person’s right to bodily security. Judge
Premium Law Appeal Rights
In order the thwart the evilness of Patent Trolls‚ the U.S. Patent office must implore new efforts into ending lackadaisical patent granting‚ Legislation and Judicial efforts must be tightened in order to lessen the financial appeal of trolling‚ and public industries must take the initiative by solving this problem with their own means by placing basic technological patents into the public domain. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is under great financial distress and must be aided in order
Premium Patent Invention Innovation
The Development of Common Law and Equity Common Law has been functioning in England since the 1250’s‚ two centuries after William the Conqueror defeated Earl Harold Godwinson in the Battle of Hastings in 1066 and became King. It was then in 1066 that Law began to be standardised. There were‚ however‚ problems with the Common Law system and people were becoming dissatisfied with the remedies distributed by the Court. As a result‚ the Court of Chancery was established and could provide whatever
Premium Common law Jury
Once the case has been proved in the Court of law‚ then there are a number of remedies available to the aggrieved party. The most common of them being injunction which can be of two types‚ namely‚ temporary or interim injunction and permanent injunction. Besides this Anton Pillar Order can be granted in certain cases where the defendant is in possession of the infringed goods and they have to be seized‚ forfeited or damaged. Order XXXIX of the Code
Premium Copyright United States Law
court. Most of the Amendments might not be as black and white as people would want them to be. Our forefathers left a gray area‚ which has now been left to the people of various sates to fill in. Though unknown by me‚ as to how affective Civil gang injunctions are‚ there was never injustice‚ or overstepped boundaries by the DA. East Side Riva gang members were nothing more
Premium United States Constitution United States Law
QUESTION 1 Studmaster Pty Ltd was a landlord that owned a shopping complex in Bourke Street‚ Melbourne. Mrs Tran operated the “Vietnamese Lunch Box” outlet in the food court. She had little ability to speak or read English‚ which the representatives for Studmaster knew about. Studmaster proposed a three year renewal of her lease at $48‚000 per annum plus GST for the first year and CPI increments in the second and third years. A representative for Studmaster told Mrs Tran that: • “We
Premium Law Contract Consumer protection
MOUNT KENYA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW LAW OF EQUITY ASSIGNMENT IAN NDUNGU WAWERU DLAW/112/00101 DISTINGUISH BETWEEN EQUITY AND COMMON LAW LECTURER: MARK WAGIA Common law‚ defined by Oxford Dictionary‚ is law that is derived from custom and judicial precedent instead of statutes. Equity‚ on the other hand‚ is a branch of law‚ which developed alongside common law‚ and is focused on fairness and justice. But aside from their descriptions‚ there are other differences between common
Premium Common law
remedy. In addition to that‚ the common law uses damages as a remedy for cases. The aim of damages is to compensate the plaintiff which was not always an adequate solution to every problem. This is because‚ not everyone wanted money some wanted injunction or just an apology. Due to these weaknesses of common law‚ many litigants were dissatisfied hence causing them to send petitions to the King who was known as “ The Fountain of Justice”. The King then directed his Chancellor to handle those cases
Free Common law
second defendant’s wife‚ namely‚ the first defendant. The plaintiff prayed to the court for an injunction to restrain the second defendant from continuing to take part in the management of the company and that the transfer to Ho Kum Chen‚ and subsequently to the first defendant was void because it did not comply with art 34A of the company’s articles of association. Held: Allowing the application for injunction. Section 125(1) of the Companies Act 1965 prohibited an undischarged bankrupt from acting
Premium Acts of the Apostles