Mike Bryon - Psychometric Tests Your free practice psychometric test with answers explanations and an interpretation of your score Test 2: Numerical Reasoning This test is typical of the numerical reasoning tests used by major employers’ at the intermediate and advance level. You are bound to come across this sort of question in your search for work so use it to establish the amount and level of practice you should undertake. Take the test under realistic exam type conditions and then score
Premium Psychometrics Educational psychology
1. Introduction Moral reasoning is defined as “individual or collective practical reasoning about what‚ morally‚ one ought to do”. The theory introduces two moral principles: consequentialist principle‚ which determines an act’s morality by its consequences‚ and categorical principle‚ which assesses an act by looking at its certain duties and rights despite the outcomes. To some extent‚ these two principles seem to contradict each other‚ which may become obstacles for achieving reasonable actions
Premium Morality Ethics
Shortnotes on Analytical Reasoning Provided by www.Guide4BanKExams.blogspot.in for more Materials and Previous Papers visit www.Guide4BankExams.blogspot.in There are variety of problems under Analytical Reasoning. Broadly‚ they can be categorised under the following headings. 1. Seating Arrangements (a)In a row (i)Circular 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Sequencing Combinations Comparisons Selections Series-based Ranking (b)Around a table Let us discuss and understand the details involved under
Premium Right-wing politics Left-wing politics
Ethical Reasoning In ethical reasoning‚ the Trolley Problem is an excellent example of what most people find to be ethical and unethical. Unfortunately‚ there is really no right answer. However‚ the most common answers to the two Trolley Scenarios are: it is ethical to pull the lever‚ but it is unethical to push the very large person. In the scenario of having to pull the level and kill one person verses killing five people‚ most people’s reaction is to pull the level. This was also my reaction
Premium Ethics Morality
document has 8 pages and is made up of 7 Sections. Name: Section 1 – Know the employment rights and responsibilities of the employee and employer 1. Identify four main points that would be included in a contract of employment. If possible‚ use an example contract to support your answer (feel free to obscure any confidential information). employee ’s name place of work hours of work sick leave 2a) List three key points of legislation that affect employers in a business
Premium Employment
The Problems with Descartes Deductive Proofs for God Descartes “Meditations of First Philosophy” put forward two arguments for the existence of God‚ both of which are a priori. These arguments are the Trademark argument and the Ontological argument. I shall be describing these arguments then demonstrating that they are unsatisfying in proving God’s existence. To do this I shall be discussing criticisms put forward in response to both the Trademark and Ontological arguments. These criticisms I shall
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN COLLABORATION WITH STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY UK BA (Hons) in Business Management Individual Assignment Critically Analyse the Impact of Child Labour on International Businesses by Supply Chains Module Code & Title BSB10177-2 Critical Reasoning Prepared By Heshan Chanuka Lakmal Kotigala CB004354 IF1271BM Date of Submission 23rd May 2013 Instructor Mr. S. C. Kaluarachchi Submitted in partial fulfillment for
Premium International Labour Organization Childhood Employment
Recognizing Arguments In this assignment‚ you will apply key concepts covered in the module readings. You will identify the component parts of arguments and differentiate between various types of arguments such as strict‚ loose‚ inductive‚ and deductive. You will then construct specific‚ original arguments. There are two parts to the assignment. Complete both parts. Part 1 1a: Identify Components of Arguments Identify the component parts of the argument‚ premises and conclusion‚ for
Premium Logic Argument Fallacy
Supporting the school 1. Explain the legal responsibilities of the school relating to the duty of care and the welfare of the child. All adults working with children or young people have a legal responsibility to protect them; these responsibilities are outlined in child protection laws. As outlined in the children’s act 1989 the welfare of the child is paramount‚ this act gives guidelines for schools‚ local authorities and courts which they must adhere to in order to protect children. Within
Premium Risk Data Protection Act 1998
THE TYPES OF ARGUMENTS Normally we classify all arguments into one of two types: deductive and inductive. Deductive arguments are those meant to work because of their pattern alone‚ so that if the premises are true the conclusion could not be false. All other arguments are considered to be inductive (or just non-deductive)‚ and these are meant to work because of the actual information in the premises so that if the premises are true the conclusion is not likely to be false. The difference is
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning