Unjust Laws in Today’s World In Crito‚ Plato’s arguments do show that those who have been treated unjustly still have an obligation to obey the cities laws. Socrates talks to Crito about why he should follow the laws and not escape from the Athens prison. He uses two main arguments to get to this conclusion; the parent argument and the agreement argument. Unlike the world when Crito was written; I do not think his arguments would work in today’s world. I don’t think people today are willing to just
Premium Law Plato
Two men who had a big influence on civil rights were Henry David Thoreau‚ and Dr.Martin Luther King Jr. They both believed in standing up for what they believed in‚ and disobeying unjust laws. Although they were disobeying unjust laws‚ they still were disobeying Laws‚ which is why both men suffered consequences from the law. Thoreau spent a night in jail for not paying a poll tax‚ which he didn’t pay because of his opposition to the Mexican –American War. Meanwhile‚ Dr.MLK was arrested for “marching
Premium Martin Luther King, Jr. United States African American
fight an unjust law through persuasion and to do so in a peaceful way. He also claims “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive‚ negotiation‚ self-purification and direct action‚” and Socrates does participate in the several of these actions to further his point. They both agree that in cases of unjust law‚ they should fight it (despite that one was willing to go further than another) but still respect the laws in place
Premium Plato Political philosophy Ethics
Christina Argula Prof. Trapp ELI EDUCATING RITA At the very beginning of the movie it seem like Dr. Bryant did really want to teach any one. Because he told his literature class that the sun was shining and they should be making love. But if you’ll a professor its your job to teach your students regardless if you want to or not. You cant let your personal problems affect your job. Dr. Bryant didn’t want to teach at the begining . He said
Premium Education Psychology University
meant breaking the law. In the case of Birmingham‚ it was vital for Martin to response to the out cries of the people due to the unconstitional behaviors that continued to take place there. Martin focus on 3 central themes; moral obligation over unjust laws‚ direct action and justification of
Premium Morality Ethics Civil disobedience
Thoreau felt like he had a need to live in the woods because he felt like it was the best choice for him. He felt like he didn’t really need anything at all so he lived in a cabin. Thoreau has a lot of assertions about man ‚nature and society and although some of them may be a little extreme he had valid points. Thoreau states we as people have to stand on tip-toe to read and devote our most alert and wakeful hours to. He is saying that if you are going to read something that is more difficult
Premium Writing Learning Essay
It is acceptable and even necessary to to protest unjust and unfair laws‚ because it is morally wrong. People who were being punished inhumanely because it was the law‚ “My teammates and I saw a man strung up by his neck - and set on fire.(James)” Lynching was a legal crime against black as a form of punishment. This is not a law a country is suppose to allow‚ allow such a violent law against a certain race in a way to show superiority. No one has to right or liberty to take someone’s life for the
Premium Law Crime
One of the most provocative claims that Plato makes through the voice of Socrates in The Republic is that a democracy is an unjust form of government. This view is illustrated in the quote above. This quote can be found in Book VIII in the passage in which Socrates describes how a democracy comes to be. He is claiming that‚ although a democracy gives voice to the voiceless‚ this is not a just form of government because some people should not be given a voice in government. In modern society‚ this
Premium Democracy Plato Political philosophy
“Letter from Birmingham City Jail”‚ King talks about how to know the difference between just and unjust laws. He states‚ “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust”(Shafer-Landau 408). King believed that unjust laws promote disharmony and that these laws essentially destroy human personality‚ while just laws uplift personality. In his opinion‚ he believed that laws were characterized as just laws if they were helping to make an individual better
Premium Morality Ethics Law
World. Dr. King agreed with Saint Augustine‚ “An unjust law is no law at all.” I think you can all agree that any law that is created to hinder a person‚ keep them bond‚ and make them feel inferiority is unjust. Any law that allows certain people the right to rape‚ abuse‚ humiliate‚ and belittle someone is unjust. Any time people that are in trusted in the fair distribution of the law‚ abuses‚ demean‚ deride‚ and depreciate for any reason is also unjust. There has been too much innocent blood spilled
Premium United States Human rights Law