AQUINAS’ AND ANSELM’S ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD IN SYLLOGISTIC FORM Aquinas [I] Aquinas’ First Argument‚ Motion (1) Objects are in motion. (2) If something is in motion‚ then it must be caused to be in motion by something outside of itself. (3) There can be no infinite chain of movers/movees. (4) So there is a first‚ unmoved mover. (5) Therefore‚ God exists. [II] Aquinas’ Second Argument‚ Causality (1) Some events cause other events. (2) If an event happens
Premium Ontology Existence Metaphysics
In the Republic written by Plato‚ Glaucon presented an argument concerning “the nature and origin of justice”. This argument has caused many beliefs and interpretations from Glaucon about justice. Glaucon presents his arguments by stating the four premises and what each one of them mean. His first premise is “It is by nature good to harm”. This premise is broken up into different meanings by nature‚ being referred to character individuality‚ good being referred to an enjoyable experience and harm
Premium Morality Ethics Human
October 1‚ 2013 Geometric Argument: Are Souls truly immortal and know all? In the Meno‚ Socrates tries to walk Meno through the discovery of if virtue can be taught. Along the way they come across the theory that if virtue can be taught then it is knowledge. If knowledge then it can be taught but the Geometric argument was brought up where a person can have the capacity to learn based on their previous life and their soul conjuring up prior knowledge to understand the topic. Socrates called upon
Premium Soul Immortality Socrates
Outlining a Satirical Argument First off‚ before we get any further into this argument and things are stated‚ I must make it very clear – I’m a 100% against trying to put any type of force against our right by the Constitution to bear arms. The biggest question I have that pertains to this subject is always “Do people seriously think gun control is going to make any type of positive affect on this country?” I mean‚ seriously‚ think about it. No‚ I don’t mean think about it in a way that you actually
Premium Firearm Concealed carry in the United States Law
dreaming argument to break down the very foundations of any and all beliefs gained via sensory experience. The First Meditation is used to begin in a position the Aristotelian philosophers would agree with by claiming that the meditators most certain beliefs come from the senses. From there he used the Meditations to subtly break down the foundations for beliefs gained by sensory experience. In doing so Descartes’ meditator is able to fend off all challengers to his skeptical argument and thus seduce
Premium Sensory system Perception Empiricism
that disagreements lead to arguments and dissensions lead to quarrels. I believe that Boorstin’s argument is valid when he claims that disagreements cause debates; during the presidential debates‚ two opposing sides are not in agreement with one another‚ therefore‚ they will debate over the topic. Another example is when a student is in a classroom setting and his or her peer makes a comment that the student does not accept to be true. The student will conduct an argument regarding the topic‚ however
Premium Democracy Political philosophy Government
How do we achieve consensus and cooperation? And what of changes that we seemingly have no control over? It certainly seems to me that we should be utilizing our most compelling moral philosophy‚ reason and science to influence each other and policy‚ but people are not always swayed by those sorts of things. Most people are likely moved by how they feel or are made to feel by others. I think the evidence strongly suggests that we can progress‚ and that scientific innovation and moral reasoning allow
Premium
compelling arguments about the exact meaning of the 2nd Amendment. For example‚ citizens that want to protect the individual’s right to possess a firearm concentration on the “right to bear arms” portion. While those concerned with communal responsibilities put emphasis on the “well-regulated militia” phrase to further implement restrictive gun laws. Although‚ both sides have a numerous amount of countless reasons for why they believe the 2nd Amendment exist‚ there is always a better argument. So‚ after
Premium Firearm Gun politics in the United States Gun politics
I agree with daniel weintraub because he gives good detail on every single one of his arguments and does not back down “ . If parents not the government ‚ not the the fast food companies not the video-game manufactures who are responsible for teaching kids healthy eating and exercising habits . Can they use some help ? Sure but they are the ones who need to step up to the plate ‚ so to speak .’’ Daniel Weintraub appeals to readers emotionally by making us feel bad about what we eat
Premium
The Arguments for God and Confirmation Bias In What Question Does a Theistic Argument Answer‚ Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski argues that the three arguments for the existence of a deity are responses to an assortment of inquiries. We cannot know if one of the arguments is successful‚ unless we can comprehend the question the argument aims to answer. In addition‚ we need to know who is asking the question. For instance‚ an agnostic may be asking a question directed towards both a theist and atheist. She
Premium God Religion Existence