Intro to Law In Class Assignment: Chapter 12 – Torts Answers in bold Questions: 1. Matt lost his Introduction to Law text‚ so he "borrowed" Sam’s copy without first asking Sam’s permission. After using it to study for the exam‚ he gave it back to Sam. This is an example of a. trespass to personal property or chattels. b. conversion. c. interference with a contractual relationship. d. false imprisonment. 2. The four basic elements in a negligence case are: a. duty‚ proximate
Premium Tort Tort law
on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME‚ Inc.‚ Advertisement Has WIRETIME‚ Inc.‚ committed any torts? If so‚ explain. Wiretime‚ Inc.’s ad in the well-known industry magazine stated that BUGusa‚ Inc. electronic recording devices are low quality and not reliable for more than a month (University of Phoenix‚ 2013). This tort is defamation since it can harm the company’s reputation. This written defamation‚ or libel‚ falls under the element of specificity because
Premium Tort Strict liability Negligence
Tort law appears to discriminate between different types of defendant’s such as public entities‚ rescuers‚ children‚ manufacturers‚ etc. when establishing a duty of care and to whom. This is because the law of torts is a specialized area of the law that seeks to account for damages in a civil setting that may occur because of a breach of that duty. Further‚ much of tort law has been developed randomly‚ many times to fill in gaps that exist in the law‚ and at other times‚ it is influenced by public
Premium Law Tort Duty of care
LAW OF TORT LAW2002-N 20011/12 Lectures 3 and 4: Trespass to the Person Lectures 5 – 12: Negligence TRESPASS TO THE PERSON Reading: Steele Chap 2 to page 81; Street Chap 3; Winfield Chap 4. ASSAULT AND BATTERY Introduction Battery: intentional application of force to another person. Assault: act of the defendant which causes to the claimant reasonable apprehension of the infliction of an immediate battery on him by the defendant. Battery 1. The character
Premium Tort Tort law
Tort of Negligence Damage and Injury In order for a claim of tortuous liability in negligence to be actionable‚ primarily‚ certain fundamental pre-requisites need to be established in each case respectively. The requirements of the modern tort of negligence were stated by Lord Wright in‚ Lochgelly and Coal Co ltd v McMullan‚ as being‚ i) the existence of a duty of care owed by the defendant to the claimant; ii) a breach of that duty; iii) damage or injury caused by that breach of duty. Each aforesaid
Premium Tort Negligence Injury
Module: Common Law Assignment 2: Law of Torts Submission date: 25.4.2012 By Anna Permall Contents Verity Smith runs a small printing business in Whitstable‚ Kent. Verity’s business has been thriving and she is looking to expand her business into other parts of Kent. She would like some advice regarding the following incidents: 1. (i) Lesley‚ the Office Manager‚ suffered serious injuries to her Hands and face when her IPAD2 provided by Verity exploded at her desk. (ii)
Premium Misrepresentation Law Tort
involved voluntarily and involuntarily‚ feeling like that they had an obligation to protest. The issue of this question is to determine the offences committed by the China national train drivers under Singapore law. The laws they broke include the breach of contract‚ conspiracy (tort law)‚ duress and disrupting the essential services of country (Singapore). A breach of contract is committed when a party of the contract repudiates his liability under the contract before the time of performance is
Premium Tort Reasonable person Duty of care
SUD1 Business Law Assignment 2 Law of Tort and Negligence Business Law Assignment 2 Law of Tort and Negligence Memo To: Padmanaban Badri Narayanan. From: Doan Le Khanh Vy (Ivy). Regarding: Report On Common Law. Date: 9th December 2012. I am Ivy from class SUD11‚ Sunderland of University. I write this memo to you in order to aid you comprehend my work easier. I have spent a great deal of time for this assignment. This is the first time I study law‚ so there a great
Premium Tort Common law Tort law
International College of Business and Human Resources Development Common Law Assignment 1 BMT: 387-09-09 Task 1(P1) A contract may be defined as an agreement which legally binds the parties. A party to a contract is bound because he has agreed to be bound. The underlying theory then is that a contract is the outcome of ‘consenting minds’. Parties are not judged by what is in their minds what they have said‚ written or done. Contracts are
Premium Contract Tort Common law
damage‚ injury or loss as a result. And in order to access the negligence of any individual as well as the liability that those individuals may encounter due to their act of negligent‚ it is important to know how negligence is determined in law. According to the Law of Negligence‚ the Panel is requested to examine the formulation of duties for Tom and the bar owner; the causation of Tom and the bar owner; the foreseeability of harm by the two parties as well as the remoteness of the risk. Furthermore
Premium Tort Law Tort law