Criminal Justice 1 Case Review October 16‚ 2013 Terry Brice Horton v. California Argued February 21‚ 1990 496 U.S. 128‚ 110 S. Ct. 2301‚ 110 L. Ed. 2d 112 (1990) The defendant’s armed robbery conviction was upheld by the California Supreme Court‚ the defendant then petitioned the writ of certiorari‚ which is a decision by the Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court. Justice Stevens then held that “Fourth Amendment does not prohibit warrantless seizure of evidence of crime
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
Professor Ballone 14 February 2014 Obscenity in Miller v. California Today in our criminal justice system there exists a policy known as “The Miller Test”. The purpose of this test is to determine whether or not a given substance is obscene or not. It is a test that is frequently used today by police‚ and its significance is clearly obvious. The “Miller Test” is a direct result from the outcome of the U.S Supreme Court decision‚ Miller v. California. In this case‚ a local business owner who specialized
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity Supreme Court of the United States
Introduction There have been many Supreme Court cases that dealed with many concepts of the law‚ like obscenity for example. As a matter of fact‚ obscenity is a concept that Miller v. California deals with. To be more specific‚ this case deals with what is considered obscene‚ and if the specific obscenity mentioned in this case is protected by the first amendment‚ the freedom of speech. I will now explain this case in more depth. What brought this case about? In 1973‚ Marvin Miller
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity Supreme Court of the United States
Brandenburg v. Ohio The Supreme Court uses various criteria for the consideration of cases. Not all cases may be chosen by the Supreme Court‚ so they must wisely choose their cases. The Court must be uniform and consistent with the cases they choose according to federal law. "Supreme Court Rule 17‚ Considerations Governing Review on Certiorari ’" (Rossum 28).These rules are obligatory to follow because the Court uses it to grant certiorari. There are four basic rules for Rule 17. First‚ the
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Angela jackson Ap government 9 September 2014 Riley v. California In the case of Riley v California the defendant and petitioner David Leon Riley was arrested August 22‚ 2009‚ after a traffic stop which resulted in the finding of loaded guns in car. The officer stopped riley searched him and took hold of his phone and then searched through messages‚ contacts‚ and photos. The officer charged Riley with an unrelated shooting that had taken place
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Mobile phone
The case Miller v. California (1973) was determined by the Supreme Court‚ which redefined the meaning of obscenity. The word obscene is hard to define and could be seen as “You will know it when you see it.” The Miller case determined if something was obscene‚ the average person‚ applying the standards must find the entire work‚ as obscene‚ the work depicts offensive sexual conduct defined by state law‚ and that the work as a whole lacks literary‚ artistic‚ political‚ or scientific value. Marvin
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Robinson v. California‚ 1962 “11721 of the California Health and Safety Code states: “No person shall use‚ or be under the influence of‚ or be addicted to the use of narcotics‚ except when administered by or under the direction of a person licensed by the State to prescribe and administer narcotics. Any person convicted of violating any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be sentenced to serve a term of not less than 90 days nor more than one year in the county jail” (law
Premium United States Law Supreme Court of the United States
Bibliography: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=total+tim+hortons+sales+in+2006&btnG=Search&meta= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Hortons
Premium Tim Hortons Food Fast food restaurant
the case company (Tim Horton) - Business Model: The Company’s main business is franchising and collecting royalty revenues from Tim Hortons restaurants located in Canada and the USA. The franchised restaurants serve a broad menu of drinks (premium coffee‚ smoothies‚ tea‚ espresso-based hot and cold specialty drinks) and food (fresh baked goods‚ classic sandwiches‚ wraps‚ soups‚ prepared food) (Tim Hortons: Annual Report‚ 2012). - The General Strategy in Canada (Tim Hortons: Annual Report‚ 2012):
Premium Tim Hortons Customer service Canada
by legendary hockey player Tim Horton. By 1967‚ there were three Tim Hortons stores open for business under the first successful franchisee‚ Ron Joyce (who currently serves as chairman emeritus of the TDL Group). Since then‚ Tim Hortons has grown to 2527 stores (2343 in Canada‚ 184 in the United States) and over US$800 million in revenue. With a 13-year cumulative average growth in sales of 7.1 percent in Canada and 17.5 percent in the United States‚ Tim Hortons is one very successful coffee
Premium Tim Hortons Marketing