John Knotwell ACCT 6350 10/10/2014 Case Hilton Manufacturing 1) If the company had dropped product 103 as of January 1‚ 2004‚ what effect would that action have had on the $158‚000 profit for the first six months of 2004? The impact on the profit would have been to decrease the profit by about $2.5M. This would mean that this would now trend to an unprofitable move. It was wise NOT to divest the product in the first half. 2) In January 2005‚ should the company reduce the price of product 101 from $9
Premium Expense Depreciation
1. Mr. Hilton stated that he thought product 103 should be dropped. In reviewing the statement for the period of January 1‚ 2004 to June 30‚ 2004‚ this idea is not supported. Even though product 103 continued to be unprofitable in 2004‚ Hilton Manufacturing Company did realize a profit of $158‚000 for the first half of the year by keeping it in production. By keeping product 103 in production‚ Hilton Manufacturing Company was able to spread out its fixed costs over three products instead of just
Premium Profit Profit margin Marketing
Case Study Analysis Hilton Manufacturing Company 9-192-063 Table of Content 1.1 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………3 1.2 Problem Statement……………………………………………………………………3 1.3 Data Analysis………………………………………………………………………….4 1.4 Questions……………………………………………………………………………….5 1.4.1 If the company had dropped product 103 as of January 1‚ 2004‚ what effect would that action have had on the $158‚000 profit for the first six months of 2004? ( See exhibit 2)………………………………………………5 1.4.2 In January 2005 should
Premium Variable cost Costs Management accounting
Hilton Manufacturing Company In February 2004‚ George Weston was appointed general manager by Paul Hilton‚ president of Hilton Manufacturing Company. Weston‚ age 56‚ had wide executive experience in manufacturing products similar to those of the Hilton Company. The appointment of Weston resulted from management problems arising from the death of Richard Hilton‚ founder and‚ until his death in early 2003‚ president of the company. Paul Hilton had only four years ’ experience with the company
Premium Expense Price Income statement
* 1. Analysis By: Group 2 HILTON MANUFACTURING COMPANY * 2. Answer 1 Total Actual Cost = 21224 Variable Costs for 103= Compensation Insurance+ Direct Labour+ Power+ Materials + Supplies + Repairs – Other Income Total Cost (after dropping 103)= 18712 Total Revenue (after dropping 103) = 16179 Loss= 16179-18712 = 2533 $2.533 million Loss * 3. Answer 2 Old Variable Cost = 148+2321+40+1372+94+32 = 4007 k New Variable Cost = 148+2321+40+(1372+94)*1.05 +32 = 4080.3 k Old Contribution = 9.41*750-4007
Premium Variable cost Costs Contribution margin
1) Profit Compensation Insurance Direct Labor Power Materials Supplies Repairs 158 Product 103 Total Standard 88 1341 59 946 68 20 Other Income Actual Sales 67.05 10 Remove? - Yes OK to remove 5202 Effect on 2004 Margin if Product 103 dropped -2532 A drastic net loss -2543 2) They should lower the price due to the increase in Contribution Margin shown below: Year 2005 Price Unit Sales Total Sales Compensation Insurance Direct Labor Power Materials Supplies Repairs Total Variable Costs Contribution
Premium Variable cost
Brian Lowe Case: Hilton 1. If the company had dropped product 103 as of January 1‚ 2004‚ what effect would the action have had on the $158‚000 for the first six months of 2004? The variable costs associated with product 103 will go away when the product line is eliminated. However‚ the fixed costs will remain and be spread over the other two programs. In order for the company to consider eliminating the product‚ the variable costs removed must be greater than the product sales. -------------------------------------------------
Premium Marketing Profit Costs
Michael Naftaly Spring 2015 Hilton Honors 1. How can a loyalty program help the property operator and brand owner manage customers better A loyalty program is a very useful tool in managing customers and more importantly trying to keep them. The first aspect a loyalty program aide operator and owners is the ability to track customer’s behaviors‚ wants
Premium Hotel Marketing Hotels
Background: Hilton hotels started out in Cisco‚ TX being a small family owned business in the early 1900’s. By 1946 Hilton Hotels Corp became public and 8 years later acquired Promus Corp with the intention of continuing to diversify and cater to all customers whether upper class‚ middle class‚ business or personal. Fast forward to 2007 where now Hilton owns/operates and/or franchises close to 3‚000 properties and 500‚000 rooms in 78 countries ranging from ultimate luxury to middle class hotel chains
Premium Hotel Hilton Worldwide Customer
Case Summary: Hilton Problem: From the case‚ we know Hilton is currently using the marketing penetration by focusing on business travelers. And now the expensive loyalty-program features that are added by Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide Inc. for attracting more business travelers is threatening Hilton by increasing Hilton’s cost or decreasing Hilton’s market shares. Solution: In my opinion‚ in response to the Starwood’s strategy‚ the solution for Hilton’s dilemma should be market development
Premium Airline Hotel Cost