Why was it more difficult for the Mauryan and Gupta dynasties to build and maintain a large territorial empire in India than it was for the Han Dynasty to do so in China? There are three simple factors that determine why the Mauryan and Gupta dynasties had a more difficult time than the Han Dynasty in building a large empire and maintaining it for long period of time. The three factors are the geographical location and topographical zones‚ the religion and belief system‚ and the social structure/status
Premium Han Dynasty Qin Dynasty Social class
the Han and Rome ; however‚ their views wavered greatly‚ and yet‚ were related at the same time. Both civilizations worked hard on advances in water technology. Rome ‚ as apposed to the Han Dynasty‚ is more self centered in their inventions‚ and ultimately‚ focused more on beauty‚ while the Han went for the cheaper alternative. Water is the most important source in a humans life. One could last longer hungry than they could if they were parched. Noticing that water was important‚ both the Han and
Free Roman Empire Ancient Rome
Athens and Han China were two great civilizations that were successful. Both Athens and Han China had different philosophers that influenced their civilization. Though Athens and Han China were almost five-hundred years and a continent apart‚ they both made similar successful communities with their citizens‚ government‚ geography‚ and lifestyle. Even though Athens and Han Chinas’ population is very different they both managed the population really well. “Athens’ population was a mere 315‚000 and
Premium United States Democracy African American
After viewing the documents‚ it is clear that Classical Athens and Han China are very different politically. Athens focused on the rights of the individual whereas Han China preferred dominance that used an imperialist approach. However‚ the reason for this difference in political beliefs can be based on the difference of population. It is easier to be a democracy with a smaller population than a larger one. That said it is also easier to rule many people with a select elite. Another difference
Premium Plato Confucianism Aristotle
Though they had some different qualities‚ Classical China and India were very similar. The complexities of both India and China’s social hierarchy systems were very different. However their religious views and ideas were similar‚ and they both began to decline but were able to recover and maintain stability. Both China and India used social hierarchy systems‚ but they were used differently. India used a very strict system called Varna‚ or the caste system. People only associated with people in
Premium Social class Caste China
talkers Goldinger‚ S. D.‚ & Summers‚ V. W. (1989). Lexical neighborhoods in speech production: A first report Gopnik‚ A.‚ & Meltzoff‚ A. N. (1986). Words‚ plans‚ things and locations: Interactions between semantic and cognitive development Gupta‚ P.‚ & MacWhinney‚ B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Heibeck‚ T. H.‚ & Markman‚ E. M. (1987). Word learning in children: An examination of fast mapping 58‚ 1021–1034. Hohne‚ E. A
Premium Phonology
Han China Vs. Imperial Rome The Han Dynasty and Imperial Rome were both large and powerful empires that existed during the Classical Period. The Han Dynasty and Imperial Rome had some major similarities as well as differences. The Han Dynasty had a similar government system as Imperial Rome‚ the empires’ governments made the same mistakes that led to similar declines; however the government’s involvement and view on trade was different between these two empires. Both the Han Dynasty and Imperial
Premium Silk Road Monarchy Roman Empire
Unit 2 Exam Between Han China in 206 BCE- 220 CE and Imperial Rome in 31 BCE-476 CE they had many similarities and differences about political control. The key similarities being how they both had one ruler‚ and passing on titles; the key differences being how Rome was slightly more democratic than China and how the Roman Church had more power. There were many similar political methods between Han China and Rome both had only ruler. Both empires were ruled under a tyranny. By being ruled over
Free Roman Empire Ancient Rome Pope
settled near rivers. Ancient China civilizations established on the Huang-He River Valley‚ while early Mesopotamian civilizations settled near the Tigris and Euphrates River Valley. While both Huang-He River Valley and Mesopotamia have similar politics they also differed in the interactions with the environment and economics. China and Mesopotamia had several ways of interacting with the environment. China`s type of farming differed from Mesopotamian`s farming style. China used terrace farming while
Free Mesopotamia
Given that China and Athens were located in two separate places‚ they both had very different forms of government‚ geography‚ and daily life. Han China developed a well-organized‚ working form of government called a bureaucracy. The emperor (ruling leader) stated who were governors and those governors then appointed their sector to a military power role. The segments got more condense and represented “a chain of command”. Everybody had their task in the government whether it would be economics‚
Premium Inner Mongolia China Han Chinese