OBJECTIVE This qualitative / subjective exercise was aimed at understanding the perceptions‚ opinions and attitude towards an innovative service which they might have opposed. Questions were asked in an interactive group setting where participants were free to talk with other members. The FGD provided an informal setting to the participants and gave an opportunity for disclosure among similar others where they could feel validated for having opposed a service. METHODOLOGY The discussion was initiated
Premium Customer service Risk Mobile operating system
Group decision making could be analysed as a very complex process whereby individual contributions play a big role in it. Wood et al. (2010) explained that group decision effectiveness equates to individual contributions add group process gains and deduct group process loss. We felt that the decisions made in groups contributed to a major part to mould the behaviour of individuals in future group activities. Hence‚ it is crucial to focus and analyse on the key factors that created effective group
Premium Critical thinking Decision making
whole-hearted support of Mr. Bhaskar Sharma(Regional Manager‚ OUTLOOK Group) for his kind motivation and guidance to design‚ undertake and accomplish the study and the project. I would also like to thank OUTLOOK Group for the training program and for the knowledge which I’ve gained during the session. My obligation to Mr. Prince Vohra(Project Mentor‚ Lovely Professional University) and Mr. Madhusudan Meher (Project Mentor‚ Outlook Group)and other faculty members is immense for their vision to motivate
Premium Names of large numbers Corporation
Case Study: The Forgotten Group Member MGMT 591 - Leadership and Organizational Behavior Prof. Dr. Barbara Vallera September 21‚ 2012 Case Study: The Forgotten Group Member After reading this case study and reviewing our textbook‚ I have concluded that this group is definitely in the Norming stage of team development. According to our text‚ " The Norming stage of team development sometimes called initial integration‚ is the point at which the members really start to come together as a
Premium Sociology Psychology Leadership
MOBILISING PEOPLE MDP 114Q MDP JAN 2012 3/12/2012 MDP JAN 2012 3/12/2012 EDS211A UNIQUE NUMBER: 229768 EDS211A UNIQUE NUMBER: 229768 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 2 INTRODUCTION 3 2.1 ZULULAND ANTHRACITE COLLIERY (PTY) LTD (ZAC) 4 2.2 ST JOHN 4 2.3 CHEP 5 3 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 5 3.1 EFFECTIVE PERFOMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM 5 3.1.1 DESIGN INPUT 6 3.1.2 TRAINING APRAISERS 6 3.1.3 FORMAL AND INFORMA METHODS 6 3.1.4 APPRAISAL SYSTEM EVALUATION
Premium Performance management Management Quality management
weaknesses of group decision making which may perhaps lead to an improvement in organisational decision making. In order for an organisation to exist there must be a collection of people trying to achieve the same purpose. Several issues arise when a group comes together to discuss ideas and formulate plans effecting the organisation. Performance becomes more effective and efficient when proper techniques are used to accomplish a specific task or activity. Brainstorming‚ the nominal group technique as
Premium Decision making
more than two‚ people prefer working with their friends‚ or others in a group to achieve their goals easier‚ but nowadays even studies require a group work‚ and sometimes the member of it will be chosen randomly‚ so they would probably face so many problems that would affect achieving their goals‚ those problems can be developed with some strategies and dynamic that I’m going to provide and analyse it with an example. In my Business foundation year I have been required to work in a group to do a Business
Premium Problem solving Member of Parliament Abelian group
2010 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering(ICSTE) Better Technologies and Services for Smart Homes of Disabled People: Empirical Findings from an Explorative Study among Intellectually Disabled Jukka Ojasalo‚ PhD‚ Professor Laurea University of Applied Sciences Espoo‚ Finland jukka.ojasalo@laurea.fi Heikki Seppälä‚ Researcher Laurea University of Applied Sciences Espoo‚ Finland heikki.seppala@laurea.fi Niko Suomalainen‚ Researcher Laurea University of Applied
Premium Disability
PEOPLE IN ORGANISATIONS Level 7 I. ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR 1.1. The meaning of organizational behaviour We live in an organizational world. Organizations of one form or another are a necessary part of our society and serve many important needs. The decisions and actions of management in organizations have an increasing impact on individuals‚ other organizations and the community. It is important‚ therefore‚ to understand how organizations function and the influences which they
Premium Motivation Job satisfaction Organizational studies and human resource management
personally beneficial outcomes of attending a support group including: (1) realizing that they were not alone with their concerns‚ problems‚ and pressures‚ (2) receiving encouragement and understanding; and (3) gaining the ability to understand and communicate personal feelings. Another project conducted by Toseland and his colleagues Rossiter & Labrecque‚ asked group members what the most helpful aspects of peer-led and professionally-led support groups (1989). The response was an appreciation of the
Premium Developmental psychology Psychology Childhood