EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proctor and Gamble (P&G) over its journey of about 175 years has become one of the world’s largest consumer goods Company with sales of nearly $80 billion and a net profit of about $10 billion. P&G has a presence in more than 180 countries with brands that accumulate to in excess of $25 billion. The company has achieved success by creating high quality brand recognized products that are sold on multinational level. It enjoys one of the largest brand names in household
Premium Procter & Gamble
there is Proctor & Gamble‚ “The Innovators” of marketing. “Proctor and Gamble (P&G) is one of the most skillful marketers of consumer packaged goods. It employs 138‚000 people in more than 180 countries: is a global leader in the majority of the 22 different product categories in which it competes; has 23 billion dollar goal brands; and has total worldwide sales of more than $76 billion a year” (Kolter & Keller‚ 2009‚ p. 239). Currently‚ there are ten Proctor and Gamble philosophies
Premium Marketing
economy of India. There are several opportunities for companies to contend for market share where millions upon million of people reside. One company that has somewhat recently to contend for market share in the consumer-packaged good industry is Proctor & Gamble‚ also known as P&G. Though they have made recent headway in acquiring market share in the emerging markets‚ gaining further traction in India has and will continue to prove to be a challenge. P&G is pursuing the Indian market so aggressively
Premium Marketing Procter & Gamble
Case 5.3 Proctor and Gamble Goes Dumpster Diving By Anne Marie Dutkovic Business Ethics – BUS 290-013016 February 5‚ 2010 The case of Proctor & Gamble and Unilever provides a perfect example of the controversial method of using dumpster diving to obtain confidential information on a corporate rival. Dumpster diving is when you shift through rubbish to collect confidential information. (Hils-Cosgrove‚ 2001) This method is becoming increasingly popular in corporate America as
Premium Business ethics United States Ethics
Marketing Strategies in the Competition between Branded and Generic Antibiotics (A) Clamoxyl in 1996 02/2007-5057 This case was prepared by Pierre Chandon‚ Assistant Professor of Marketing at INSEAD‚ Olivier Kovarski‚ Professor of Marketing at ESC Normandie‚ Jacques Lendrevie‚ Professor of Marketing at HEC‚ Sarah Spargo‚ Research Associate at INSEAD‚ and Marc Vanhuele‚ Associate Professor of Marketing at HEC‚ as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective
Premium Generic drug Pharmaceutical industry Antibiotic resistance
Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies According to Porter‚ strategies allow organizations to gain competitive advantage from three different bases: cost leadership‚ differentiation and focus. Porter calls these bases as generic strategies. Cost leadership emphasizes producing standardized products at a very low per unit cost for consumers who are price sensitive. Differentiation is a strategy aimed at producing products and services considered unique industry wide and directed at customers who are
Premium Porter generic strategies
of Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies in the Romanian Hotel Industry Ovidiu N. Bordean‚ Anca I. Borza‚ Răzvan L. Nistor and Cătălina S. Mitra‚ Abstract— Porter’s generic strategies remain one of the most widely accepted typology of strategic options for businesses. Using a survey a sample of 69 hotel managers from the Nord-West part of Romania was questioned about their current strategic practices. A factor analysis revealed that hotels are pursuing only two strategies that can be identified
Premium Balance sheet Management Investment
* Identify the generic strategy adopted by a product or division of your firm and also a major competitor. Attempt to justify your answer by comparing with the industry average benchmarks (Price and Cost data). * Draw a value chain of your firm‚ mentioning key points of functional fit/ misfit with the above generic strategy. E.g. how will Operations /marketing support the identified strategy. Make recommendations for any change needed. ------------------------------------------------- 1a
Premium Strategic management Management Supply chain management
Porter’s generic strategies framework constitutes a major contribution to the development of the strategic management literature. Generic strategies were first presented in two books by Professor Michael Porter of the Harvard Business School (Porter‚ 1980‚ 1985). Porter (1980‚ 1985) suggested that some of the most basic choices faced by companies are essentially the scope of the markets that the company would serve and how the company would compete in the selected markets. Competitive strategies focus
Premium Strategic management Porter generic strategies Michael Porter
falls under 3 base strategies of Cost leadership‚ Differentiation and Focus. With the use of his generic strategy model‚ a firm‚ understanding where its competitive advantage lies‚ can then formulate and implement an effective business strategy geared towards the sustainability of this advantage. The 3 bases‚ formed 5 generic strategies : Cost Leadership‚ strongly speaks towards the production of a lower price product. It appeals to consumers because of low cost. Type 1 strategy is Cost Leadership
Premium Strategic management