Opportunities. Lifestyle. Location. These are all important factors for me to consider as I think about where I want to live after I graduate college. Although Chicago and Hawaii both have advantages‚ I should move to Arizona instead. Due to its beauty and bright lights‚ people are drawn to Chicago for many reasons. Chicago‚ also known as the “city that never sleeps” is home to many shops‚ restaurants‚ clubs and bars (The Guide to Moving). Chicago is so diverse that it offers many different types
Premium Hamburger Fast food Pizza
Arizona Gas Pipeline On July 30‚ 2003 an Arizona gas pipeline owned and operated by the Houston‚ Texas based company‚ Kinder Morgan Energy Partners‚ burst in Tucson and was shut down. A small portion of the 11-mile pipeline‚ which is about five feet underground burst and at least 10‚000 gallons of gasoline spilled; the pipeline rupture spewed gasoline 50 feet into the air. The Arizona gas pipeline cuts through Tucson’s South and West sides en route from El Paso‚ Texas to Phoenix‚ Arizona and
Premium Supply and demand
Miranda vs. Arizona Miranda vs. Arizona was the case that altered the criminal justice system. It gives criminals the rights they do not deserve. Ernesto Miranda was the man who was responsible for the change in law enforcement. He argued that he was not informed of his rights during his arrest and his Fifth and Sixth amendments were violated. After that‚ the Miranda Rights were established to protect the suspect from refusing to answer self-incriminating questions and the right to an attorney
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Police
Arizona Prosecution There are over fifty states in America‚ and all of them handle juveniles differently. Out of all of the states‚ Arizona caught my attention. I chose this state because it was far away from my home state‚ New Jersey. Also‚ I knew somewhat of the juvenile systems around the east coast‚ which is what propelled me to choose a state that is across the country. My opinion on juvenile execution is that it should not happen‚ even though it has happened in certain states around the
Free Crime Capital punishment
Contention 1- The majority does not perform the greatest ability to protect all members of a society. In the case of Miranda v Arizona‚ the courts had to decide whether or not a man was deprived of his freedoms while in police custody. Basically Miranda v Arizona completely changed the way police apprehend and interrogate suspects. However it was not only Miranda‚ but many other instances where the majority has not protected all minorities. Vignera v New York was another similar instance where
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Police
in others there was next to no sign of ever making contact with the disease. At times it made me curious as to why it was more dominant in some places than others‚ but slowly over time I gave up on figuring it out. The first place we went to was Arizona. Most of our family lives there and we wanted to make sure they were okay since there was no phone reception in most places. My mom and I were glad to see that they lived in one of the lucky towns. We stayed for a couple of days to restock and
Premium Parent Family Mother
Arizona‚ one of the driest places in the United States‚ in my opinion‚ is an amazing place to visit. Arizona is not very humid‚ so even though the temperature gets high it does not feel that hot. Arizona is by far the best place I have ever visited. I visited Arizona three years ago‚ in the winter time. I went to visit my grandfather in Tucson. Arizona is my favorite place because its landscape is beautiful‚ there are plenty of activities‚ and there is a wide variety of wildlife. First and foremost
Premium United States Water Tourism
Ernesto Miranda‚ a 22-year-old individual from Mesa‚ Arizona was a young man coming from a harsh childhood and who had obtained criminal record too early in his life. Miranda was arrested on March 13‚ 1963 in Phoenix for the kidnapping and rape of 18-year-old Rebecca Ann Johnson. His arresting officers‚ Carol Cooley and Wilfred Young‚ interrogated Miranda for two hours without informing him of his self-incrimination rights‚ or even his right to an attorney. This unconstitutional act on behalf
Premium Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution
Miranda v. Arizona‚ 384 U.S. 436 (1966)‚ was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which passed 5–4. The Court held that both inculpatory and exculpatory statements made in response to interrogation by a defendant in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police‚ and that the
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Brief Case Miranda v. Arizona Early in 1963‚ a 17 years old woman was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix‚ Arizona. The police investigated the case‚ and soon found and arrested a poor‚ and mentally disturbed man. The name of this man was Ernesto Miranda. Miranda was 23 years old when he was arrested. On March 13‚ 1963‚ Miranda was arrested based on circumstantial evidence linking him to the kidnapping and the rape. After 2 police officers interrogated him for 2 hours‚ he signed a confession to the
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Chief Justice of the United States