The Society for Financial Studies IPO Market Timing Author(s): Aydoğan Alti Source: The Review of Financial Studies‚ Vol. 18‚ No. 3 (Autumn‚ 2005)‚ pp. 1105-1138 Published by: Oxford University Press. Sponsor: The Society for Financial Studies. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3598087 Accessed: 10/04/2010 08:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR ’s Terms and Conditions of Use‚ available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR ’s Terms
Premium Initial public offering Google Auction
Name: Roll no: 2011203 Div: Finance B MMS II Law assignment: IPO Promoters Role INTRODUCTION The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has tightened rules governing promoter contributions in initial public offerings by mandating a one-year lock-in period on such holdings from the date of allotment of shares to other shareholders of the company. Presently only 20% of the promoters’ share in the IPO is subject to such lock-in. Sebi has introduced this and a slew of other changes
Premium Initial public offering Venture capital
Summary August 8‚ 1995 had taken an unexpected turn for Netscape Communications Corporation’s board of directors. Earlier that morning‚ the day before the company’s scheduled initial public offering (IPO)‚ Netscape’s lead underwriters proposed to the board a 100%increase in the original offering price from $14 to $28 per share. Founded in April 1994‚Netscape Communications Corporation provided a comprehensive line of client‚ server‚ and integrated applications software for communications and commerce
Premium Initial public offering Web browser Venture capital
THE Google IPO | Understanding IPO Pricing Alternatives | MF Case 5 Group 9: | Angela 1113809238 | Jason 1113809011 | Jeff 1113809018 | Simon 1113809237 | 3/11/2012 | | Table of Contents 1 Google versus Baidu (Dutch Auction vs. Book Building) 1 2 Alternative IPO pricing methods 2 2.1 Book Building 2 2.1.1 Hallmarks of book building: 2 2.1.2 Green Shoe Option 2 Dutch auction 6 2.1.3 Sealed-bid price-discriminatory auction 6 2.1.4 Sealed-bid uniform-price auction 6
Premium Stock market Stock Initial public offering
Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review‚ 14(1): 57-74. Fama E.‚ & Jensen‚ M. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics‚ 26: 301-25. Gompers‚ P.‚ Ishii‚ J.‚ & Metrick‚ A. 2003. Corporate Governance and Equity Prices. Grossman‚ S. J.‚ & Hart‚ O.D. 1980. Disclosure Laws and Takeover Bids. Journal of Finance Hilmer‚ F. G. 1993. Strictly Boardroom: Improving Governance to Enhance Company Performance Hollingsworth‚ J. R.‚ Schmitter‚ P.‚ & Streeck‚ W. 1994. Governing
Premium Factor analysis Governance Corporate governance
The role of the Corporate Communication function in the organization A case of “best practice” FedEx Alessandro Colangelo * INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………….p. 2 * RESEARCH QUESTION...........................................................................................................p. 3 * METHODOLOGY…………………………………..................................................................p. 3 * ANALYSIS……………………………………………………………………………………...p. 4 1. The close alignment
Premium Strategic management Strategic planning Corporation
DATE: 02/05/09 BAIDU.COM‚ INC.: VALUATION AT IPO Since its official launch in January 2000‚ Baidu.com‚ Inc. (Baidu) quickly grew to become the leading Internet search engine in China. After three rounds of private funding‚ Baidu registered to go public on the NASDAQ Stock Market (Ticker Symbol: BIDU) on August 5‚ 2005. (See Exhibits 1 and 2 for a listing of Baidu’s private funding sources and pre-IPO share allocations.) The initial public offering (IPO) turned out to be one of the highest-profile
Premium Web search engine Google search Internet
Netscape’s IPO Case Memo Question 1 a) Why are investors excited about Netscape? Historically speaking‚ the main reason that made investors so excited about Netscape’s IPO is because the whole market favored venture-backed high-technology stock offerings‚ particularly those related to the internet in 1990s. The market was in hot issue status that the stock prices were increased by an average of 20% on the first day of trading for nearly half of IPOs in
Premium Venture capital Initial public offering
Facebook kept growing rapidly. With the high expectation of investors‚ Facebook finally decided to go public. The “Red Herring” of Facebook stated that its goal was to connect all two billion global Internet users. Basing on our analysis of Facebook’s IPO‚ we would like to give several recommendations on the investment of Facebook. Analysis Facebook generated its revenues mainly through advertising. Advertising accounted for 98% of Facebook’s revenue in 2009‚ 95% in 2010 and 85% in 2011. As a real identity
Premium Stock market Facebook Initial public offering
Fedex Case Study Fed Ex Case Issue: Federal Express is a strong recognizable brand with growth potential‚ but the company faces a multitude of challenges with rising fuel prices‚ increased value of living‚ as well as a decline in the economy. FedEx also encounters issues with competition and even negative publicity due to various lawsuits involving violations against EEOC laws and regulations. SWOT Analysis: Strengths: • Best leader in express shipping o 99% of deliveries
Premium United Parcel Service