the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists‚ those who supported ratification‚ and Anti-Federalists‚ those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be
Premium United States Constitution United States Federalist Papers
In federalist 10 Madison discusses groups and how groups are unsafe to the administration. He says that to control groups an extensive assorted Republic will must be made. A vote based system won’t work in light of the fact that if the lion’s share of individuals
Premium United States Constitution United States President of the United States
reform‚ alter‚ or totally change the same‚ when their protection‚ safety‚ prosperity‚ and happiness require it.” Federalists believed this‚ and fought verbal and written battles against the Anti-Federalists‚ who disagreed with John Adams. Anti-Federalists believed that in an elite democracy‚ the elite’s would get greedy and selfish‚ and only worry about themselves. As I’m on the Federalist side‚ I believe that John Adams was correct in his statement‚ and that the government is only trying to uphold
Premium Democracy James Madison Political philosophy
During the Constitutional Period‚ there were two groups of people; one group called the Federalists‚ wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists‚ opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution‚ preferring instead for power
Premium
When deciding whether the Constitution better embodied the American commitment to democracy (republicanism)‚ or whether it produced a greater compromise to it‚ one must define the nature of a republican government. Both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist set forth their distinctive views on the quality of representational government‚ but it was James Madison and Alexander Hamilton vision I feel was the most correct. By accepting their view‚ it is clear that they propose the best arguments for why
Free United States Constitution Separation of powers Federalism
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Debate After Articles of Confederation it was seen necessary to repeal the Articles and create one that is perfect for everyone in the country‚ but it wasn’t that easy. Federalists claimed that we needed a strong central government to prevent rebellions such as Shay’s Rebellion that damaged the states while the Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government could turn into a kingdom like U.K. which they have fought and damaged deeply‚ recently. In different
Premium Separation of powers United States Constitution Judiciary
Ian Federalist Paper #15 The Federlists and Anti-Federlists both saw a need for change in the government. The only poblem with this is that the two had almost opposite ideas although they realized the the Articles of Confederation didn’t have enough power. The main obstacle was how much power should the new government have. The Federalist form of government provided the best government of the two. Alexander Hamilton was unsatisfied with the Articles of Confederation. He
Premium United States Constitution Articles of Confederation United States
Federalist 10 1. Madison says that “complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens”—what are these complaints that people make. a. “…that our governments are too unstable‚ that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties‚ and that measures are too often decided‚ not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party‚ but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” 2. Are these complaints valid in Madison’s
Premium Democracy Government
originally created‚ it did not contain a Bill of Rights. In the Constitutional Convention‚ the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights was not necessary. Opposingly‚ the Anti-Federalists argued that the central government had too much power and that our Constitution needed a Bill of Rights that would explicitly state the rights of the citizens. In order to settle disputes between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists that claimed the government had an imbalance of power‚ the Bill of Rights was created.
Premium United States Constitution United States Supreme Court of the United States
The federalist was known as pro nationalist with a strong national government support‚ where the national and state would have a certain power‚ but neither would have a supreme authority over the other. They also support the constitution which they abide too with a personal liberty protection. The anti-federalist also called the State right s advocates agree with a strong State rights‚ pro limited national government by limiting the power of the National Government. These two school of thought had
Premium United States Articles of Confederation Federalism