Name _Jordan Peterson___________ Critical Thinking Week 2 Homework (50 pts) 1. (12 pts.) Label each definition with the appropriate name of the fallacy from the following list. (Note there will be two fallacy names that are not used.) Ad hominem/attacking the person | Ad ignorantiam/appeal to ignorance | Ad populum/appeal to the people | Ad misercordiam/appeal to pity | Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning | Equivocation | Red Herring | Straw Man | A. Sliding from one
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy
In the eye opening documentary‚ The Human Experiment‚ directed by Don Hardy and Dana Nachman‚ the many health dangers of thousands of harmful chemicals in everyday products are exposed. The film explores the lives of people who have been affected by the ubiquitous chemicals found in our food and our homes. The film addresses the battle against powerful industries that are determined to keep consumers in the dark about the dangers of many of their products. The fight against dangerously lethal chemicals
Premium Rhetoric Fallacy Argument
Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies Note: This document should only be used as a reference and should not replace assignment guidelines. Common Rhetorical Devices Paradox A statement that initially seems contradictory but actually reveals a truth when viewed in a new context. A paradox can effectively grab a reader’s attention‚ such as in a hook in an opening line. EXAMPLE: Less is more. Point of View The perspective from which a story is told‚ which can color the delivery of the author’s
Premium Fallacy Rhetoric
The Disruption of Logical Fallacies Have you ever come across an article or essay that seems to lack a certain sense of logic? Often times‚ logical fallacies find their way into papers and documents. These so-called fallacies discourage the audience to continue reading to the end. Logical fallacies are major issues‚ causing disruption in the flow and credibility of articles. This disruption often leaves readers questioning whether or not what is being stated in the article is true. The essay “How
Premium Critical thinking Argumentation theory Argument
Michael Phelps Subway Commercial September 17‚ 2014 Michael Phelps Subway Commercial Logical ideas make business rise up. Many companies‚ nowadays‚ used many different ideas to sell and make business. Some companies accomplished their goals by using mass media to advertised commercial and some failed to accomplished their goals because their advertisements was not attractive enough. As for Subway’s commercial‚ they used an athlete‚ Michael Phelps‚ to build up their product and business. The commercial
Premium Rhetoric Causality Appeal to emotion
Tammy Chang Instructor: S. Joseph English 103 February 25‚ 2013 Logical Fallacies Do you want to have a great argument? Then you need to use excellent rhetoric technique and think carefully about what you want to say to persuade others to be on your side. You have to consider the opposition and make sure to address counterargument so that the listener can understand well what you have thought about the whole thing. Especially in modern society‚ we have more information and comments that can
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy Attacking Faulty Reasoning
with is why there is common ground. The excerpt has several logical fallacies which is some type of counter statement that weakens an argument (Writer’s np). There are dozens of articles that are published in newspapers‚ advertisements‚ and other sources that have these logical fallacies. It is not easy to know if an argument is fallacious. The argument might be very weak to very strong. The writer makes the first logical fallacy called red herring. A red herring is when during the argument‚ the
Premium Fallacy Feminism Critical thinking
position against addiction being termed a disease. In light of the problem presented and the position taken‚ I will analyze the passage. I will demonstrate that the author’s position is not justified by critically evaluating logical fallacies‚ narrow usage of concepts and lack of definition‚ unacceptability and insufficiency of claims. A macro level appraisal of the passage will also be provided. Peele is not successful in defending his thesis as he does not substantiate
Free Fallacy Argument Logic
1B October 28‚ 2012 Mr.‚ Amrine Inherent Fallacies We humans live in a world were illogical fallacies run rampant. In 12 Angry Men the author illustrates everyday illogical fallacies people have in the setting of a court jury. Jurors: 3‚ 4‚ 7 and 10 have their own fallacies that are unique to them in the play; but can be found in common people in everyday people. In 12 Angry Men the illogical fallacy for Juror Number 3 is a general fallacy. This fallacy is the result of an emotional prejudice by
Premium Critical thinking Attacking Faulty Reasoning Fallacy
are ten critical questions to ask that are presented. The ten questions are: What are the issues and the conclusions?‚ What are the reasons?‚ Which words or phrases are ambiguous?‚ What are the value and descriptive assumptions?‚ Are there any fallacies in the reasoning?‚ How good is the evidence?‚ Are there rival causes?‚ Are the statistics deceptive?‚ What significant information is omitted?‚ What reasonable conclusions are possible? (Browne & Keeley‚ p. 9) After asking and evaluating each of
Premium Critical thinking Reasoning Logic