Standard 1: DESIGN This 2 hour online workshop is an indication of this standard because of the frontloading and research that went into its creation. I incorporated what I knew of the learners into the initial design phases of the module. Taking multiple learning styles and multiple intelligences into consideration helped me to create targeted activities‚ assignments‚ and resources to reach a broader pool of participants. After all‚ “to teach effectively‚ you’ve got to know how people learn
Premium Assessment
Project Rationale This project (Medical Records System with Mobile Support) was designed and developed to easily facilitates and monitors the patients records. This project will help the clinic to speed up the process of patient monitoring and searching patient’s records. This aims to solve the minor problems identified en every process encountered by the personnel-in-charge from monitoring and searching patient’s information. The developers have come up with a solution to make the clinic’s manual
Premium Physician Hospital Patient
Pedagogical Rationale Meeting the needs of students from all ethnicities may prove difficult in New Zealand‚ where students are from all different areas of the world. But the problem that needs to be faced is the ways in which Teachers can improve successful learning for Maori students. The Principles of best practice will assist Maori students experiencing minor to modest learning and behavioural difficulties. The Strategies of best practice that I have chosen to write about is The Effective
Premium Education Learning
Miranda V Arizona In the history of the United States‚ the legislative branch of government has developed systems of laws which the judicial branch of government checks. Because of modernization‚ the constitutionality of these laws needs to be reevaluated from time to time. There have been many cases that have caused the government to amend certain laws to protect its citizens. One of the most important cases that was brought to the Supreme Court was the case of Ernesto Miranda V the state of
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Robert Henry Miranda v Arizona “This Court has undertaken to review the voluntariness of statements obtained by police in state cases since Brown v. Mississippi‚ 297 U. S. 278 (1936). (Davis v. North Carolina‚ 384 U.S. 737 (1966)) The Warren Court from 1953 until 1969 established luminary rights with its liberal interpretation‚ and as some say “ judicial policy making”‚ such as the “right to privacy” Griswold v. Connecticut‚ 381 U.S. 479(1965)‚ “separate but equal is not constitutional” Brown
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Miranda vs. Arizona: This case had to do with an Ernest Miranda who raped a Patty McGee*. After extracting a written confession from the rapist about the situation‚ Miranda’s lawyer argued that it was not valid since the Phoenix Police Department failed to read Miranda his rights‚ also in violation of the Sixth Amendment which is the right to counsel. Some factors that helped support Miranda’s arguments were that the suspect had requested and been denied an opportunity to consult with a lawyer;
Premium Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution Police
Miranda v. Arizona‚ 384 U.S. 436 (1966)‚ was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which passed 5–4. The Court held that both inculpatory and exculpatory statements made in response to interrogation by a defendant in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police‚ and that the
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Miranda V. Arizona In Miranda v. Arizona‚ The issue the court had to consider was if the statements obtained from Mr. Miranda while he was subjected to police interrogation would be admissible against him in a criminal trial‚ and if the police procedures which ensures Mr. Miranda is made aware of his rights under the Fifth Amendment not to be forced to incriminate himself‚ are necessary. The Bill of Rights guarantees that everyone has the right to due process. The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark
Premium Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Miranda vs. Arizona Miranda vs. Arizona was the case that altered the criminal justice system. It gives criminals the rights they do not deserve. Ernesto Miranda was the man who was responsible for the change in law enforcement. He argued that he was not informed of his rights during his arrest and his Fifth and Sixth amendments were violated. After that‚ the Miranda Rights were established to protect the suspect from refusing to answer self-incriminating questions and the right to an attorney
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Police
---------------Discuss the position of the character of Javier Miranda in relation to the social forces and the historical conflicts that surround him in La verdad sobre el caso Savolta The period of social‚ political and economic upheaval in which Barcelona finds itself in La verdad sobre el caso Savolta provides a framework that encircles the events and characters in the novel. Mendoza places the character of Javier Miranda in the centre of this turmoil in order to comment on the extreme corruption
Premium Spain Fiction United States