LGEAL PERSONALITY Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows a minority shareholder to bring a claim on behalf
Premium
ways in which they can get out of the problem‚ if ever there is a possible way to do so. In fact‚ even after the lay-off of almost 8‚000 employees or 20 per cent of the company’s employees‚ it was still listed as number 31 on Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For. This goes to show that despite the massive layoff‚ they still proved their worth as an employer‚ because they have open communication practices. They do not hide from their employees what their steps towards recovery are. There is a
Premium Communication Termination of employment Layoff
Arizona Employment Laws Clapton Commercial Construction is planning on expanding their current business to a new state. They currently do business in Michigan and are planning on expanding to Arizona. There are ten employment laws in Arizona that Clapton Commercial Construction should be made aware of in order to get their HR department up to speed before expanding to the state of Arizona. These are laws regarding required postings‚ minimum wage‚ overtime‚ meals and breaks‚ vacation leave‚ sick
Premium
There are five principles to ethical nursing. The first principle‚ nonmaleficence‚ or do no harm‚ it is directly tied to a nurse’s duty to protect the patient’s safety. This principle dictates that we do not cause injury to our patients. A way that harm can occur to patients is through communication failures. These failures can be intentional or as a result of electronic or human error. Failing to convey accurate information‚ giving wrong messages‚ and breaking down of equipment‚ can cause harm
Premium
3.4 Review progress against learning plan and make updates for improving own work and further learning BA303 Work in a business environment 1.2b b) for organisations 1.3 Explain what is meant by diversity and why it should be valued 1.4 Outline the benefits of diversity to an organisation 1.5 Explain how to treat other people in a way that is sensitive to their needs 2.1 Outline the purpose and benefits of maintaining security and confidentiality at work 2.2 Outline requirements
Premium
Part A Your managing partner has handed you the Supreme Court of Queenslands’ decision in The Public Trustee of Queensland and Anor v Meyer and Ors [2010] QSC 291 and asked you to answer the following questions. You should assume you are answering questions for someone who has not read the case‚ so be sure to provide sufficient detail in your answers. You do not need to provide reference details for Part A of the assignment. 1. Explain who were the respective parties to the action. Why were there
Premium
Question 1 The UK Rail vs. Smithfileld case is a striking example of the term – Agency of Necessity. This is the case when‚ in certain circumstances‚ the agent is allowed by law to take actions on behalf of the principal without the will‚ knowledge or any other representation of the principal. However‚ certain requirements have to be met‚ in order for the agent to claim that it acted out of necessity: 1) the actions have been taken for the reason of compelling emergency; 2) impossibility
Premium Partnership Retirement Pension
Explain and illustrate Lockes universal consent argument. One account Locke unambiguously rejected from the outset is the supposition that human knowledge is innately inscribed. Noting the remarkably wide-spread agreement of individual human beings in their acceptance of both speculative and practical principles‚ the innatist argues that universal consent implies an innate origin. Locke’s response was two-fold: He denied the supposed fact of universal consent‚ supposing this to demonstrate the
Premium Logic Truth Epistemology
Every person loses sometimes. In Elizabeth Bishop’s poem "One Art‚" Bishop displays her accepting attitude to losing. Using verse form and language‚ Bishop is able to express her different feelings about losing. Because of her experiences with loss‚ the poet is able to express her attitude towards loss. Throughout the poem‚ verse form plays an important role in Elizabeth Bishop’s description of losing. Every tercet from lines 1 to 15 helps to describe that the speaker "[loses] something everyday
Premium
Contract Law Essay Introduction The case‚ as set out‚ concerns two companies‚ Smart Co (hereinafter S Co) and Bright Co (hereinafter B Co). S Co needs to be advised as to whether it can claim compensation under the breach of the contract‚ which can exceed the 50£ limitation‚ which limitation is included in the contract under a clause. In simple words the validity and therefore the effectiveness of the limitation clause is to be considered under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 . For the
Premium