Asif Tufal Contract-Law-page CASES ON FORMATION OF A CONTRACT OFFER Payne v Cave (1789) The defendant made the highest bid for the plaintiff’s goods at an auction sale‚ but he withdrew his bid before the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer. It was held that the defendant was not bound to purchase the goods. His bid amounted to an offer which he was entitled to withdraw at any time before the auctioneer signified acceptance by knocking down the hammer. Note: The common law rule laid down in
Premium Contract
Case name Case facts What it links to Rookes V Barnard Rookes sued the union officials‚ including Mr Barnard‚ the branch chairman. Rookes said that he was the victim of a tortious intimidation that had used unlawful means to induce BOAC to terminate his contract. The strike was alleged to be the unlawful means. -The case was almost immediately reversed Miliangos V George Frank Textiles George Frank Ltd was a Swiss textile producer who sold and delivered textiles to Miliangos‚ textile
Premium Case law Stare decisis Ratio decidendi
1. Lakshminarayan Ram Gopal and Son Ltd V. The Government of Hyderabad‚ AIR 1954 SC 364 FACTS: An Agency agreement was entered into between the Mills Company and the appellants appointing the appellants it’s Agents for a period of 30 years. The appellants throughout worked only as the Agents of the Mills Company and for the Fasli years 1351 and 1352 they received their remuneration under the terms of the Agency agreement. Notice was sent to the appellants to pay the amount of tax appertaining to
Premium Contract Agency
List of Cases: - Abdul Haque v. Mohammed Yehia Khan AIR 1924 Pat 81 - AC Kunjumohammad v. Govardhan Hathibai AIR 1956 Tr and Coch 93 - Baijnath v. Kshetrahari Sarkar AIR 1955 Cal 210 - Bank Line Ltd v A Capel & Co[1919] AC 435 - Beswick v. Beswick [1968] AC 58‚ [1967] 2 All ER 1197 - Bradley v. Newsom Sons & Co [1940]3 All ER 60 - Chaplin v. Hicks [1911] 2 KB 786 - Davidson v. Gwynne (1810) 12 East 381 - Dharam Veer v. Union of India AIR 1989 Del 227 - Evans Marshall & Co. Ltd. v. Bertola
Premium Contract law Contract Breach of contract
because of the aftermath of the 2013 data breach which affected up to 70 million consumers personal information (Riley et al.‚ 2014). Most of which could have been prevented if they had the principle managerial functions in place. CEO Greg Steinhafel lacked in many of these areas to which led to his ouster at Target. Greg Steinhafel made many bad decisions during his time‚ whether it is a botched expansion into Canada‚ or the mishaps before and after the data breach in 2013 (Reisinger‚ 2014). Before the
Premium Target Corporation Management Department store
INTRODUCTION A contract (according to Gibson 1997) is a lawful agreement made between two or more persons within the limits of their contractual capacity‚ with the serious intention of creating a legal obligation‚ communicating such intention‚ without vagueness‚ each to the other and being of the same mind as to the subject matter‚ to perform positive or negative acts which are possible of performance. Contracting parties through agreement‚ breach and operation of law can terminate contractual
Premium Damages Contract Breach of contract
After the colossal Equifax data breach‚ should CEO Richard F. Smith be put in jail? According to NBC‚ the breach affected up to 143 million people. This is nearly half the population of the United States. The breach revealed credit card numbers‚ social security numbers‚ addresses‚ and other information. NBC also stated the breach did not just affect Equifax customers meaning everyone should be cautious. These and other reasons are why individuals believe Richard F. Smith should be jailed. Richard
Premium
Privity of Contract LGST101 Business Law Professor George Shenoy Group Members: Ue Mu En‚ Esther Goh Yue Lin‚ Sylvia Fong Li Chu Sabina Sun Chao Ng Shi Ya 1 Content Page 1. Case Summary 2. Can Brad sue Jennifer? 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Validity of Contract Breach of Contract Brad cannot sue Jennifer Brad can sue Jennifer 3. Can Angelina sue Jennifer? 3.1 3.2 Angelina cannot sue Jennifer Angelina can sue Jennifer 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 Contract (Rights of
Premium Contract Common law Breach of contract
Research Paper Title 2008/9 ‘Termination of the contract as a remedy for breach of contract by the seller: a comparison between English law and the CISG.’ A Research Paper submitted to the University of Manchester for the Degree of LL.M Masters (International Business Law) in the Faculty of Humanities. School of Law ID#744178 April 2008/9 Declaration i. No portion of the work referred to in the research has been submitted
Premium Contract
2nd of feb CASES MALLIK V BCC: Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] UKHL 23 is a leading English contract law and UK labour law case‚ which confirmed the existence of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in all contracts of employment. Facts: Mr Malik and Mr Mahmud both worked for the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. BCCI went insolvent due to massive fraud‚ connection with terrorists‚ money-laundering‚ extortion and a raft of other criminal
Premium Contract Breach of contract