RUNNING head: Apple Corporation: Ethical and Social Responsibility Apple Corporation: Ethical and Social Responsibility Romeo Gamble Strayer University Apple Inc. is an American corporation that is located headquartered in in Cupertino‚ California that designs‚ develops‚ and sells electronics like computer software‚ online services‚ and personal computers. It’s very well known for hardware products like the Mac computers‚ iPods‚ iPhone and
Premium Apple Inc. Steve Jobs
MGT 400 Sustainability: Ethical and Social Responsibility Dimensions Faculty: Case Study Henry Siegel Student: Allen Johnson National University December 12‚ 2012 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Issues Raised 4 Textbook Questions 5 References 6 Introduction When making business decisions that impact the environment‚ there are often risks and issues that affect an organization. It is important to identify those issues and risks to promote sustainability.
Premium Pollution Carbon dioxide Environmentalism
ETHICS INTERNET Egoism Reading Assignment: MacKinnon‚ Chapter 3 Thomas Hobbes‚ Self Love‚ pg. 45 Plato‚ Conclusion to the Ring of Gyges Objectives: Explain the difference between psychological and ethical egoism; Discuss the consistency and/or inconsistency of ethical egoism. Define the moral point of view List and describe the 3 levels of the soul Lecture: EGOISM What does egoism mean? A descriptive definition is “a theory that
Premium Ethical egoism Individualism Egoism
contrast to the belief that we should ‘look out for number one’. This ‘bumper sticker’ promotes selfishness‚ the opposite of the desirable virtue that is altruism. This is known as egoism. Ultimately‚ this means that we should act in our best interests‚ only perform acts that benefit or will benefit ourselves. 2. “Ethical egoism is different to what we might call egotism”‚ the idea that we should act in ways that benefit us immediately. In Ayn Rand’s view‚ egotism is natural‚ what all people should live
Free Ethical egoism Egoism Ayn Rand
According to the text‚ Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong‚ in addition to the four arguments supporting ethical egoism‚ there are five arguments against it. I will present these in the same manner as the others. The first argument against ethical egoism comes from Brian Medlin and it is “The Inconsistent Outcomes Argument”. This argument claims the theory of ethical egoism cannot be true because it fails to meet a necessary condition of morality—namely‚ being a guide to action. The second argument
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy
conflict. Throughout our class we have discussed many theories and strategies to help understand why moral conflicts get solved different ways. These theories‚ particularly ethical egoism and act/rule utilitarianism‚ can be used to explore different ways in deciding the morality of whether or not Sarah would steal. Ethical egoism is defined as “the theory that the right action is the one that advances one’s own best interests.” (Vaughn‚ 78) According to this theory‚ it would be morally right for Sarah
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
Mike Delaney Ethics paper Psychological egoism is the idea that people do everything with self-interest as their main motivator. If people help others‚ so even when people are being altruistic they are ultimately doing so because of the gain that they expect to get in one way or another. Psychological egoism is also a theoretical form of egoism because it describes only what is observed and not the way it is supposed to be like in a normative egoism. Thomas Hobbes felt that without some sort
Premium Ethical egoism Altruism Egoism
Ethical Egoism is the ethical theory which states that all actions ought to be done either solely/ultimately for the sake of self interest. The criterion of rightness is what is morally right is what is good for the agent. The decision procedure would be that the agent must determine‚ in some way‚ what is good for him/her‚ and then do that. So‚ an act is right if and only if it brings the best consequences for an individual. Therefore‚ the action that is to be done is the action that is only to
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Explain the difference between psychological and ethical egoism‚ and why Rachels rejects both of these theories. Do you think his arguments are convincing? Why‚ or why not? Psychological egoism: all men are selfish in everything that they do; the only motive from which anyone ever acts is self interest Even if what they do is benefiting others‚ they are to believe that whatever they are doing is actually to their own benefit Ethical egoism: a normative view about how men ought to act. Regardless
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Culture
you want whenever you want would you? I believe that a vast majority of people would answer this with a yes. That is because everyone is at some level worried about themselves usually more than others. The philosophy behind this idea is called ethical egoism or the idea of putting one’s self before others. John Gardner’s Grendel hones in on this philosophy in chapter six. Gardner focuses on how Grendel only really cares for himself. He doesn’t care for his mother‚ he doesn’t care about any gods‚ and
Premium Ethical egoism Morality Egoism