this case presents several different issues to consider‚ the underlying problem is the correct implementation of Eastboro’s dividend policy. Eastboro was founded as a manufacturer of machine parts‚ and has traditionally paid a fairly substantial dividend. However‚ in recent years‚ the core focus of the company has shifted toward technology in the fields of computer-aided design and manufacturing‚ highlighted by its latest development‚ Artificial Workforce. This shift in the focus of Eastboro has
Premium Dividend Stock market P/E ratio
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT‚ INDORE Finance 2 Case Analysis Gainesboro Machine Tool Corporation Course Instructor: Prof A Kanagraj Submitted By: Amol Vyawahare Roll Number: 2008PGP021B Gainesboro Machine Tool Corporation Background Reading: Once a company makes a profit‚ they must decide on what to do with those profits. They could continue to retain the profits within the company‚ or they could pay out the profits to the owners of the firm in the form of dividends. Once the
Premium Dividend Dividend yield Stock
Executive Summary Gainesboro Corporation was a company who designed and manufactured a number of machinery parts‚ including metal presses‚ dies‚ and molds. The company was found in 1923 in Concord‚ New Hampshire‚ by two mechanical engineers‚ James Gaines and David Scarboro. The two men had gone to school together and were disenchanted with their prospects as mechanics at a farm equipment manufacturer. In the 1940’s Gainesboro produced armored-vehicle and tank parts and miscellaneous equipment
Premium P/E ratio Stock Dividend
TOPIC: MACHINE TOOLS India stands 13th in the production and 6th in the consumption of machine tools in the world. The country is set to become a key player in the global machine tools industry with substantial increase in manufacturing of high end machine tools. The Indian machine tool industry has approximately 1000 units in production of machine tools‚ accessories/attachments‚ sub-systems and parts. Threefourth of machine tool producers in India are ISO certified. The market for machine tools
Premium Numerical control Milling machine Machine tool
CASH BUDGET for HAMPTON MACHINE TOOL(000 $) CURRENT September October November December Receipts: A/R Collection(assumes 30-day;Oct& Nov. less advances of $840 and $726‚ respectively) Bank Loan Total Cash Inflow Expenditures: A/P Payment(paid in 30 days) Other Op. Outlays CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Taxes Interest Loan Principal Dividends Total Cash Outflow Beginning Cash Net Monthly Cash Flow ENDING CASH 684.000 2243.000 1323.000 2022.000 779.000 350.000 2136.000 1604.000 2369.750 January Sales -Advances
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Cash flow Cash
Mr. Jerry Eckwood‚ V.P of Louis national bank requested loan from customer named Hampton Machine Tool Hampton-requested renewal of the existing 1 million dollar loan‚ repaid time of Sep.30 Additional-asking for a 350‚000 loan for planned equipment purchases in Oct. Under terms of company’s request‚ both were to be paid back end of 1979 Background of Hampton Established in 1915‚ machine tool manufacturing business. Recent months‚ record production/profitability mid-late 1960. -Customers
Premium Finance Balance sheet
Hampton Machine Tool Company was established in 1915‚ whose customers were aircraft and automobile manufacturers located in the St. Louis area. The company had a large success rate throughout the 1960’s‚ with an unfortunate decline throughout the mid 1970’s in sales. The company was able to recover in the years following due to a large increase in military aircraft sales‚ especially the company’s conservative financial policies. Mr. Benjamin G. Cowins‚ president of Hampton Machine Tool Company requested
Premium Money Loan Debt
Hampton Machine Tool Case Group 5: Laura Lafitte‚ Joe Loden‚ Chris Ingham‚ Keenen Leake‚ and Humberto Maldonado Hampton Machine Tool Company was founded in 1915 and began supplying parts to military and automobile companies. Beginning in the 1960’s‚ heavy increases in defense spending prompted by the Vietnam War in conjunction with a blossoming automobile industry allowed Hampton Machine Tool Company to experience a period of high growth and increased profitability. By the mid-1970’s‚ defense spending
Premium Manufacturing Renault Ford Motor Company
Zachary Duffy Hampton Machine Tool Company From the point of view as the bank creditor‚ Jerry Eckwood‚ a determination must be made of whether Hampton Machine Tool Company should receive an extension of their original loan of $1 million‚ as well as an additional loan of $350‚000. After research and careful consideration and extraneous research and forecasting‚ we‚ St. Louis National Bank‚ as well as myself‚ Jerry Eckwood‚ have determined to reject Hampton Machine Tool Company’s loan request‚ as
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Financial ratios
Hampton Machine Tool Company -Case Write-up Summary: On September 12‚ 1979‚ Hampton Machine Tool Company requested from St. Louis National Bank a renewal to their loan of $1‚000‚000 due to be repaid on September 30‚ 1979 and also to be given an additional loan of $350‚000 for new equipment purchases in October 1979. Both loans were to be repaid on December 31‚ 1979. Hampton M.T. Company wrote a letter to the St. Louis National Bank stating the reasons for the extension of the loan and the need
Premium Income statement Pro forma 1979