Philosophy 14 November 2007 Notes from Underground Armed with a view that strongly opposes the ideas presented by rational egoism‚ Fyodor Dostoevsky conducts an all-out assault against the theory in his 1864 novel‚ Notes from Underground. The narrator is a sick‚ pessimistic man who remains nameless throughout the course of his ranting. Without any recognizable respect for his own health and well being out of pure spite‚ he is the perfect character to illustrate Dostoevsky’s argument against the
Premium
Act Utilitarianism vs Rule Utilitarianism Our world is governed by rules‚ either implied or implemented‚ and early on we are taught to live by these rules. Society expects us to act in such a way that will conform to these rules in order to live happy‚ harmonious lives. We do things‚ careful not to break any of the rules that might hurt or cause harm to others. Sometimes though‚ we do things not in accordance with the rules but based on what we feel is the right thing to do. Some people believe
Premium
reason could end a country’s struggles and create a utopian society where all people could live happily. Fyodor Dostoevsky‚ author of Notes from Underground‚ had a different idea. He strongly believed that no amount of logic predict man’s actions. He thought that man’s free will would always prevent any kind of earthly utopian society from existing. Through Notes from Underground‚ Dostoevsky makes a statement that man always has a choice to act against the scientific laws of nature. Notes from Underground
Premium Russia Age of Enlightenment Philosophy
Outline the theory of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is the theory that an action is better if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number. The 18th and 19th century saw rise to the theory of Utilitarianism which can be traced back to Jeremy Bentham. Francis Hutcheson put forward the initial principle of Utilitarianism ’The greatest happiness of the greatest number’. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory where depending on the consequences of the action‚ that action will either be good
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Peter Singer
One of the core assertions of John Stuart Mill’s book‚ Utilitarianism‚ is that Utilitarianism can and should provide the basic moral framework for an individual’s decisions. He argues‚ often convincingly‚ that if all of society followed a system of morals dedicated to the maximizing public well-being‚ or utility‚ everyone would benefit. This perspective places the burden of decision making overwhelmingly on the individual who is not necessarily capable or properly equipped to make decisions which
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics John Stuart Mill
Utilitarianism vs. Moral Rights and Principles of Justice Ed Konieczka University of Mary Undergrad Student This assignment asks us to answer the following two questions: Does utilitarianism provide a more objective standard for determining right and wrong than moral rights do? Does utilitarianism provide a more objective standard than principles of justice? I was previously asked to study utilitarianism in a class that studied business law. I was unsatisfied with utilitarianism at the time
Premium Ethics Morality Intrinsic value
Utilitarianism vs. Individualism Arguments for utilitarianism and individualism will never end. The essence of utilitarianism‚ pleasure is the chief end of life and the greatest happiness for the greatest number should be the ultimate goal of human beings‚ has always been a crucial matter of concern and controversy. It is regarded as an exploit of people’s freedom and individualism. However‚ individualism is deemed as an ignorance of teamwork. We cannot simply tell which one is superior to the
Premium Utilitarianism
Mill’s Utilitarianism brings an extended concept of Bentham’s philosophy and a response to Kant’s deontological philosophy. The basic concept of utilitarianism is to act in such a way as to create the most pleasure or the least pain. This is the guideline because‚ as Mill states‚ we desire happiness; happiness is maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. However‚ is utilitarianism viable? There are many arguments for it‚ but just as many against. First‚ utilitarianism allows for the good
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics John Stuart Mill
ABSTRACT Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory originally established by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that advocates brining about good consequences or happiness to all concerned. Kantianism is the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Kantianism is another famous rule of the nonconsequentialist theory. Kant’s theory contains several ethical principles. These principles are the good will‚ establishing morality by reasoning alone‚ categorical imperative‚ duty rather than inclination‚ and summary
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Morality
Pros and Cons of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a philosophy in which the ends justify the means‚ or in which the morality of an action is determined by the function that follows the action. Although Utilitarianism has many good principals that are both logical and appealing‚ the contradictions of the philosophy make it incompatible with Christian ethics. The moral standards that utilitarianism is supposedly based on only work when a person doesn’t consider the personal emotions that might
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy