Credible Information Debate 2 There is much debate concerning the validity and reliability of Wikipedia. The internet has transformed the way we gather and learn information. Fifteen years ago‚ we had internet access‚ but not to the extent we do today. Even in the 1990’s‚ if a paper was required for a class that meant time was spent in the library
Premium Wikipedia Peer review Academic publishing
to be a credible source for gathering information‚ Wikipedia is used by everyone in the academic community for obtaining information. The site was established in early 2001 and its purpose is an open source concept using information entered by registered users. The website provides information or description on anyone from the president of the United States to information about a Boeing 747. Higher learning institutions do not consider Wikipedia as a credible or valid source for gathering information
Premium Wikipedia Credibility Source
Wikipedia From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia |Wikipedia | |[pic] | |[pic] | |The logo of Wikipedia‚ a globe featuring glyphs from several writing systems | |[pic] | |Screenshot of Wikipedia ’s multilingual
Premium Wikipedia
approach and data collection and processing‚ Wikipedia has become a popular method for many to seek out answers. When it comes to the topic of Wikipedia‚ most of us will readily agree that it’s a great source for information. Where this agreement usually ends‚ however‚ is on the question of its validity. Whereas some are convinced that it’s a means of presenting facts‚ others maintain that its accuracy should be highly scrutinized. Although Wikipedia can provide expeditious access to vast amounts
Premium
Donatello Donatello ‚an artist of unfathomable intelligence ‚was inspired ‚or devilishly driven ‚to play out in stone a spiritual peril inherent in art(web). He is one of the most famous artists in history. He sculpted numerous objects and statues that have inspired other artists. Donatello was an innovator who was influenced by statues he saw in his time and by his teachers. His passion for art made him the great artist he became. He was one of the most influential individual sculptor of
Premium Florence Leonardo da Vinci Italy
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that provides a large number of information. Students only need to enter the key word in the search bar‚ and then‚ they can usually find information they need. However‚ since Wikipedia allows users to edit the content‚ it is controversial if the information on it is credential. Although there is system to supervise the editing
Premium Writing process Writing Writing style
During the renaissance Michelangelo had created many magnificent pieces of art‚ one of which is the most well-known pieces among the world; the sculpture of David. The Michelangelo sculpture of David wasn’t the only one created during its time‚ for Donatello had created one some years before hand. Among the two sculptures‚ Michelangelo’s has a more profound‚ fascinating‚ and exceptional quality to it that contributed greatly to the Renaissance. The High Renaissance was a period denoting the
Premium Florence Renaissance Michelangelo
Writing an Argument based on LT Wikipedia Debate MGT/521 November 26‚ 2012 Week 2: Writing an Argument based on LT Wikipedia Debate The topic of discussion in week two learning team A was a debate of if Wikipedia was a creditable and valid source of information. The debate consisted of the team member’s previous experience using Wikipedia for research purposes and the general overview of its information. My take on the matter and still is that Wikipedia is not considered a creditable
Premium Wikipedia Website Debate
One of the most popular sites to look up information on any topic‚ Wikipedia has been known for its open editorial information. Many people today distrust Wikipedia for its inaccuracy and false information. On the other hand Wikipedia is a great starting point for looking up information and veritable knowledge. Wikipedia has changed throughout the years‚ hiring historians to put the correct information. Not only has the site hired people to fix the problems‚ but also chained other site into its
Premium Source Truth Evidence
assignment. One resource that I’ll suggest is Wikipedia‚ and I’m not the only person who will; “It’s an online information source that is increasingly used as the first‚ and sometimes only‚ stop for online encyclopedic information.”(Kapila‚ D.‚ & Royal‚ C. 2009) There was a time in my University career when using Wikipedia as a scholarly resource was deemed unacceptable‚ and at first thought‚ I would completely agree. The content found on Wikipedia is generated entirely from its users‚ with little
Premium Wikipedia