THE SALE OF GOODS ACT‚ 1930 What you should know? ✓ 15.1 Formation of Contract of Sale ✓ 15.2 Conditions and Warranties – Doctrine of Caveat Emptor. ✓ 15.3 Transfer of Ownership from seller to buyer – Transfer by non-owners ✓ 15.4 Performance of the Contract – Rules regarding delivery. ✓ 15.5 Rights of Buyer ✓ 15.6 Rights of Unpaid Seller ✓ 15.7 Auction Sales The Sale of Goods Act‚ 1930‚ governs transfer of property in goods. It does not include transfer
Premium Contract Contract law
memo Microsoft To: From: CC: Date: Re: CEO Sheryl Ellis HR 4/30/2013 Constructive Discharge Comments: Per your request regarding former employee A. According to US Legal Constructive Discharge is generally when working conditions are so intolerable to amount to a firing‚ despite a lack of a formal termination notice. Most of the time unemployment benefits are not payable unless a Constructive Discharge can be proven. However‚ it can be established by one of the following: evidence of difficult/unpleasant
Premium Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Employment Affirmative action
Regarding CAS training‚ cultural issues make a clear difference about how to integrate air and land domain. The Army’s relationship to air power is far different from that of the Marine Corps. The Marines train their ground and air units to fight as a combined arms team. Their airmen see their sole mission as assuring the survival and success of Marines on the ground. Their forward air controllers (FACs) are all Marine pilots‚ who may also be assigned to ground units. In contrast‚ the Army has no
Premium United States Marine Corps Aerial warfare United States Army
Table of Contents d 5 Torrens Title Lan Introduction 5 Principle of Indefeasibility 5 Key Provisions (RP Act) 5 Deferred v immediate indefeasibility 6 Frazer v Walker 1967 6 Breskvar v Wall (1971) 7 What will attract indefeasibility? 8 Leases: 9 Mercantile Credits Ltd v Shell Co of Australia Ltd (1976) 9 Karacominakis v Big Country Developments (2000) 11 Mortgages: 11 Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (2007) 11 Volunteers 12 Bogdanovic v Koteff (1988) 12 Rasmussen v
Premium Property law Easement Mortgage
British Institute of International and Comparative Law Is the Doctrine of Ultra Vires Dead? Author(s): R. Baxt Source: The International and Comparative Law Quarterly‚ Vol. 20‚ No. 2 (Apr.‚ 1971)‚ pp. 301315 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/758032 . Accessed: 26/04/2013 02:48 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use‚ available
Premium Corporation Company Ultra vires
To what extent is Nationalism inherently aggressive and expansionist? Intro: It is difficult to define Nationalism as either inherently destructive or expansionist. It depends on the type of Nationalism and the circumstances in which is arises and how people use or abuse it as an ideology. Heywood defines four main breeds of Nationalism; Liberal Nationalism‚ Conservative Nationalism‚ Expansionist Nationalism‚ Anti and post colonial Nationalism. One of the types of nationalism which is more likely
Premium Nationalism
culture etc.‚ initiating many different movements. As a response to the declining aristocracy and the rising bourgeoisie‚ the neo-classicism began to spring up to accommodate the new institutions of bourgeois society through the re-adoption of antique doctrines. (Modern Architecture: A Critical History P12) Although it acts as an introspection of the over-elaboration of architectural language in Rococo interiors of Ancien Regime and the secularization of Enlightenment thought (Modern Architecture: A Critical
Premium Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Presented by: Hazrat Gul Totakhil Student: M2014036 1 2 Contract Defined An agreement between two or more parties representing a promise to be performed for consideration 3 Necessary Parts of a Typical Construction Contract O Parties identified O Parties make promises that constitute an offer O Both parties sign the contract O Both parties receive consideration: O Contractor – payment for work done O Owner – use of the completed project O Parties of the contract must have the LEGAL AUTHORITY
Premium Contract
marginal change (new-old)tax/taxable average tax/taxable Effective tax/total Federal Taxes Income Employment (Social Security and Medicare tax(.9%+ on ee) by employer and ee; self-employee tax) un Excise (quantity sold) Transfer (MV estate/gift) state and local taxes: income‚ sales and use‚ excise‚ and property taxes Corp. tax returns 3/15 partnerships 5 mo. Extension no file a tax return penalty= 5% per mo. tax due. Max= 25% tax owed statute of limitations: later tax return filed
Premium Taxation in the United States Tax
under employment-at-will doctrine‚ an employer may fire an employee even if doing so would violate a federal or state statute. ANSWER: F PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal 2. The key consideration in determining whether an employment manual creates an implied contract is the employee’s reasonable expectations. ANSWER: T PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal 3. The most common exception to the employment-at-will doctrine is made on the basis that
Free Employment Discrimination Affirmative action