Groupthink Groupthink is a practice of making decisions within a group that values unity rather than accuracy and discourages personal responsibility. In other words‚ groupthink is agreeing with a group out loud‚ although you may not agree with the group inside your mind. There are eight different symptoms that are involved with groupthink. The symptoms include the illusion of invulnerability‚ rationalization‚ inherent morality‚ stereotyped views‚ direct pressure‚ self-censorship‚ the illusion of
Premium Education Psychology Thought
Groupthink Model In American psychologist Irving Janis’ work Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascos‚ Janis defines groupthink as the “psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups” (Janis 9). Janis successfully links the groupthink theory to events such as the Cuban Missile Crisis‚ the Bay
Premium
Groupthink Case Study Introduction Working in groups is something we all encounter in our life‚ in and outside of work. A group - or team - consists of people working together because they have a common purpose or goal. Decisions are made by teams every day and it is imperative that the decision-making process be effective. Shortcomings in the decision-making process should be avoided (Thompson‚ 2004). A situation that can occur within a group is called Groupthink. Groupthink leads to
Premium Decision making Decision theory Risk
com website (2015)‚ a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on‚ groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when individuals have similar
Premium United States Iraq War 2003 invasion of Iraq
1. Groupthink and polarization impacted the kids throughout the film; the class decided that they should have a name‚ and a uniform to set them apart from the rest. The students then started hanging out with only other in the class‚ and created a handshake. Group thinking caused the class to join into as one‚ they all had each others’ backs; Tim was getting bullied by a few students‚ that weren’t in the cult‚ and a few of the members in the wave came to rescue and punk the other guys. Polarization
Premium Marriage Woman Love
Irving L. Janis’ Victims of Groupthink Author(s): Paul’t Hart Source: Political Psychology‚ Vol. 12‚ No. 2 (Jun.‚ 1991)‚ pp. 247-278 Published by: International Society of Political Psychology Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3791464 Accessed: 11/01/2010 13:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use‚ available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use provides‚ in part‚ that unless
Premium Political philosophy Sociology Cognition
4) Groupthink is when individuals held back their stating views in a meeting and agreed to someone else’s position or can go along with the boss suggestion when in fact the individual disagreed with suggestions. These caused a highly cohesive teams to lose their critical evaluative capabilities. There are several symptoms of groupthink such as illusions of invulnerability‚ Belief in inherent group morality‚ self-censorship by members‚ illusions of unanimity‚ mind guarding‚ rationalizing
Premium Psychology Morality Ethics
present when groupthink occurs‚ and there is a great reluctance on the part of group members to stray from the group’s position. They do not want to leave‚ be forced out‚ or be ignored by other members. This “oneness” associated with cohesiveness is typically a desirable condition except when the group relies too much on solidarity that the desirable ends are not focused on. They are likely to operate in the group in a manner that seeks the approval and even affection of the other group members. This
Premium Decision making Decision theory Flipism
How does the theory of groupthink apply to the 1986 Challenger disaster? Here is a brief trailer for a larger analysis of the disaster: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3K2vqVAG7iI Do you‚ or does the literature‚ think that NASA ’s organizational culture was also to blame for the 2003 Columbia disaster‚ or was the problem of groupthink alleviated in the intervening 17 years? Please use your text and online research about the administrative issues that led to this disaster. Remember to cite
Premium Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger Space Shuttle
Avoiding the Groupthink Trap Remain impartial. The leader should not take a directive role but should remain impartial. Seek outside opinions. The leader should invite outside opinions from people who are not members of the group and who are less concerned with maintaining group cohesiveness. Create subgroups. The leader should divide the groups into subgroups that first meet separately and then meet together to discuss their different recommendations. Seek anonymous opinions. The
Premium Decision making Decision theory Decision making software