“A motion to remand the case on the basis of any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction must be made within 30 days after the filing of the notice of removal under section 1446 (a). If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction‚ the case shall be remanded. ….” Defendant (Federal Jurisdiction) VS. Plaintiff (lack of federal court’s subject matter jurisdiction) ‐> DOES FEDERAL COURT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THIS CASE?
Premium Jurisdiction United States Civil procedure
The Speluncean Explorers Case is Lon L fuller’s‚ it was first published in the Harvard Law review in 1949‚ the focus of this theoretical case that I have gathered is to elucidate the opinions and theories of different judges. Taking into account these sagacious views‚ I have been able to come up with an evaluation of my own. The main question we’re dealing with out here is that of executive clemency‚ i.e. mercy or leniency; especially‚ the power of the President or a governor to pardon a criminal
Premium Law Crime Judge
Steroids used in Athletics Case and Ethical Considerations: This case is about Carl’s decision of taking or not steroids to recover his prime physical condition. The ethical question for this problem is: “Should Carl use steroids?” One position for this case is Carl should use steroids. The other position is Carl should not use steroids. Relevant Facts: Carl lost muscle tone while recuperating from a broken leg and he knows that their teammates need him to win the baseball games. He knows that
Premium Metabolism Ethics Anabolic steroid
LIST OF CASES: 1. Davis v. Johnson‚(1978) 2 WLR 182 2. Delhi Transport Corporation v. DTC Mazdoor Cong. and Others‚ AIR 1991 SC 101 3. All India Reporter Karmachari Singh v.All India Reporter Ltd.‚ AIR 1988 SC 1325 4. Ram Manohar Lohia v.State of UP and others‚ AIR 1968‚Alld. 100 5. Ahmed Khan v. Shah bano Begum‚ (1985) SCR (3) 844 6. His Holiness Kesavnand Bharti Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala‚ AIR 1973 SC 1461 7. Indira Sawhney v. Union of India‚ AIR 1993 SC 477 8. Vishakha and others
Free Common law Law
------------------------------------------------- Foss v Harbottle Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows
Premium Pleading Plaintiff Corporation
Management Strategy Case Questions Case 5: Panera Bread Company 1. What is Panera Bread’s strategy? Which of the four generic competitive strategies discussed in Chapter 3 most closely fit the competitive approach that Panera Bread is taking? What specific kind of competitive advantage is Panera bread trying to achieve? 2. What does a SWOT analysis of Panera Bread reveal about the overall attractiveness of its situation? Does the company have any core competencies or distinctive competencies
Premium Strategic management
Institute Of Personnel Management Sri Lanka NAME OF THE PROGRAMME : - PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATON IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TOPIC OF THE CASE STUDY : - PERERA CONFECTIONARIES MODULE NUMBER : - MODULE 01 NAME OF THE LECTURE : - MRS. RAJEE RAVICHANDRAN For Office Use Only: 1. Final Marks : ……………………….. 2. Remarks : ……………………….. (To be filled by the Examiner) LATE SUBMISSION NO OF DAYS Content Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………
Premium Management
The parable of Sadu Group X 1. Define the main issues presented in the case. Individual perception on ethics Individual ethics vs. group ethics How group ethics influence behavior of individuals and other way around How lack of leadership and group ethics influence behavior of individuals towards Sadhu and within companies How lack of leadership and group ethics influence behavior of individuals within the companies Necessity for CSR frameworks 2. Evaluate how the key parties
Premium Ethics Philosophy of life
International Management II (Core Competencies) Case Study Bank of America (A) by Alexander Beil Christoph Hillgärtner Florian Schlegelmilch Harvard Case Study: Bank of America List of Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Introduction / Definitions Overview “Bank of America” Product development processes Strength and weaknesses of the systems Learning through experimentation Conclusion / Learnings Summary Questions for group discussion References 1 Harvard Case Study: Bank of America 1. Introduction
Premium Management Strategic management Organization
pay the value of the checks. Hence‚ four (4) charges of estafa were filed against petitioner with the Regional Trial Court of Dagupan City‚ docketed as Crim. Cases Nos. D-8728‚ D-8729‚ D-8730 and D-8731. Arturo de Guzman was charged with two (2) counts of violation of B.P. Blg. 22‚ docketed as Crim. Cases Nos. D-8733 and D-8734. These cases against petitioner and de Guzman were consolidated and tried jointly. On 27 December 1989 the court a quo[2] acquitted petitioner of all the charges of estafa
Premium Appeal Appellate court Criminal law