Lynda Hurst and Allan C. Hutchinson both have different thoughts about the topic of surrogates. Their articles consist of stylistic techniques that are used to attract readers from two dissimilar audiences: Lynda ’s audience is directed towards the average person‚ where as Allan ’s audience targets a more higher educated reader. Both authors use different types of diction‚ structure and reasoning to capture their intended audiences. Lynda and Allan both use two distinct choices of words in order
Premium Diction Audience Audience theory
permissible passive= sometimes permissible Rachels’ argument: 1. active is more humane in some instances passive euthanasia can prolong suffering unnecessarily it is morally acceptable to choose the more humane option 2. the conventional model makes decisions on irrelevant grounds bowel obstruction is irrelevant grounds to make a life or death decision 3. conventional makes no moral distinction between killing and letting die 4. most common arguments in favor of passive euthanasia are invalid medical
Premium Medical ethics Terri Schiavo case Logic
into a relatively strong argument by supplying an appropriate premise or conclusion: Greg must be into all that New Age stuff since he wears his hair in a ponytail. 2. Make this inductive (statistical) syllogism into a relatively strong argument by supplying an appropriate premise or conclusion: People who go to Burning Man are not like you and me. Why just look at how odd Greg is! 3. Make this inductive (statistical) syllogism into a relatively strong argument by supplying an appropriate
Premium Sampling Analogy Argument
of anti-women elements; however‚ there are also anti-men characteristics that are included. This being said‚ equally strong arguments can be made for both sides. The view of this specific essay all depends on the reader. Therefore‚ this story is not only anti-women‚ but it is also anti-men. There are definitely elements of this essay that support the anti-women argument. For example‚ the narrator makes the character Polly out to be quite unintelligent and of a “ditzy” nature. Therefore‚ the narrator
Premium Argument The Reader Critical thinking
dissent between one topic leads to a quarrel‚ whilst‚ disagreeing shows a milder answer that leads to only a simple argument. By examining the outcomes and circumstances in which they are used‚ it becomes clear that disagreement and dissent have different meanings in context. Disagreement occurs when one topic isn’t supported by or agreed by all people. Often it results into an argument which is a mild outcome for disagreeing‚ after hearing both point of views‚ the opposing side usually comes to a
Premium Controversy Controversies Argument
was an Athenian philosopher accused of two crimes: corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods. In Socrates’ speech‚ he explains to a jury of 501 Athenians why he is not guilty of the crimes he is accused of. He uses a variety of logical arguments to refute his charges yet in the end he is still found guilty and sentenced to death (Grube 21). Socrates’ use of logos and his absence of the use of pathos makes for an extremely logical speech‚ however his guilty verdict raises questions about
Premium Logic Socrates Argument
along ideological lines. Their syllogisms help the audience to comprehend and accept their logic‚ while the appeals to pathos that both authors use attempt to sway readers’ emotions. In addition‚ both Cass and Van Parijs not only build up their own arguments but tear down those of the opposition as well. Regardless of whether or not a universal basic income is the answer‚ there is no doubt that policymakers must find a solution to the potential issues posed by automation that will continue unrestrained
Premium Logic Argument Basic income
about. Asking rhetorical questions These questions do not require an answer; they merely plant ideas in the mind of the audience and suggest a point of view in a subtle way. Denigration of opponents To put down the opposition and discredit their arguments is a tactic designed to get the audience on side‚ as if they are united with the speaker or writer against ‘the enemy’. Emotive words and phrases (loaded words‚ having positive or negative connotations) To make us feel some emotion (e.g. fear‚
Premium Mind Logic Audience
In the beginning of part 10‚ Demea and Philo start of by having a conversation claiming that in order for humans to find out the truth of religion‚ they must first have to see the misery and the wickedness of men. Demea replies to Philo by saying that all humans are convinced of the unhappy truth about religion. She explains that people all over the world are aware of the miseries of life‚ of the unhappiness‚ the corruption of nature‚ and the unsatisfactory enjoyment of pleasures‚ riches‚ and honors
Premium Evil Good and evil God
kids had autism. Today‚ 1 in 88 have autism” (0:05) and‚ “Since 1975‚ breast cancer rates have gone up thirty percent for both men and women” (0:02). The documentarians’ usage of both logos and pathos create an effective argument towards the documentarians’ side of the argument. The percentages don’t just stop there either. The frequency of brain cancer‚ asthma‚ leukemia‚ ADHD‚ birth defects all have increased within the last hundred years and the list goes on and on. The statistics used instantly
Premium Rhetoric Fallacy Argument