Dismantling Descartes’ Divisibility Argument In this paper‚ I will be discussing René Descartes’ Divisibility Argument in support for the idea of substance dualism. Descartes first presented this argument during the sixth meditation within his philosophic treatise‚ “Meditations on First Philosophy.” After making a series of assumptions and providing his argument via three premises‚ he concludes that the mind and the body can indeed exist apart. I intend to step through each of Descartes’ assumptions
Premium Mind Philosophy of mind René Descartes
Descartes’ Third Meditation The Existence of God Summary of First Meditation He demolished everything he had learned‚ and started over again right from the foundations Disproves one aspect of every falsehood Tries to find a certain base of certitude for actions Explains a theory that madmen’s behaviour is a personification of dreams States that all we know is truly a deception Summary of Second Meditation He questions himself‚ about the idea that he is a rational animal
Premium Ontology Existence Sense
1D) One major problem with Descartes view is the way in which he proves the existence of God. The idea that the idea of perfection can only come from perfection. The reason that this is not a sound argument is because it is easy for us to simply examine our own qualities and imagine a better version of them. For example. A person may be frail and weak‚ but that is no reason as to why they would be unable to imagine a person who is much stronger than themselves. Once you take all qualities and magnify
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Mind
It is transmitted from one individual to another‚ which brings about justification and truth that we do exist and know what we know. However‚ the idea of skepticism is an important aspect to remember as I show Gandalf that I know I exist. In Rene Descartes first meditation he claims‚ that the senses often deceive us and our perceptions can often be inaccurate. “But while my senses may deceive me about what is small or far away‚ these may still be other things that I take in by the senses but that I
Premium Cognition Mind Truth
The Cosmological Argument is not a Strong Argument for the Existence of God Mardi Campbell PHI 208 Prof. Michele Clearman-Warner March 11‚ 2013 The Cosmological Argument is not a Strong Argument for the Existence of God The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is one of the most famous of all philosophical arguments that address the existence of a supernatural being who created the material universe. The supernatural being whom created the material universe is the logical
Premium Cosmological argument Existence Theology
Descartes Proof for the Existence of God The purpose of my essay will be to examine Descartes’ argument for the existence of God. First‚ I will review Descartes’ proof for the existence of God. Then I will examine the reasons that Descartes has for proving God’s existence. I will also discuss some consequences that appear as a result of God’s existence. Finally‚ I will point out some complications and problems that exist within the proof. The basic problem with most religions in
Premium
The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further‚ he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp‚ as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge‚ and ultimately
Premium Mind Metaphysics Thought
Comparing Pascal and Descartes is like comparing apples and oranges‚ both are fruits but serve different purposes. Pascal and Descartes are both philosophers‚ and both looked at and theorized about God. However‚ they came from different perspectives‚ with different goals in mind. Descartes was looking to prove the existence of God and the authenticity of sense perception. Pascal was not trying to prove or disprove anything‚ instead‚ he was arguing for the reasonableness of faith. Further‚ the underlying
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics René Descartes
SID: 1429422 Topic: How does Descartes argue that mind and body are distinct? Is he right? “Mind versus Body” In his sixth meditation in the Meditations of First Philosophy‚ Descartes argues that mind and body are distinct and that the mind is distinct from the body in a way that it can exist without the body. I will discuss how Descartes argues that the mind and body are distinct‚ and I will argue as to why he might not be right because this better explains our intuition that sensations and feelings
Premium Mind Philosophy of mind Metaphysics
The debate of whether God exists or does not has been going on from the time of the ancient philosophers such as St. Aquinas and St. Anselm‚ who both supported the existence of God‚ whereas‚ many years later there were those who tried to disprove the arguments presented. Some of these disbelievers include Immanuel Kant‚ Friedrich Nietzsche and David Hume‚ all whom argue that God does not indeed exist. Although God is considered dead and nonexistent by many‚ he does indeed exist because something
Premium Atheism Existence Metaphysics