A Defense of A Defense of Abortion In her article‚ A Defense of Abortion‚ Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that in some though not all cases‚ women have a right to abortion due to property rights in regards to their body‚ and the undue burden against these rights that would be placed on women if they are to be made responsible for any and all pregnancies. Thomson uses a variety of sometimes strange analogies to make her point that even if we give in to the argument that a fetus is a person‚ and thus
Free Pregnancy Abortion Property
Abortion is viewed as morally impermissible. The premise is made that the fetus’s right to life outweighs the mother’s right as to what happens in and to her body. Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible in certain cases such as rape and if the mother’s life is at risk. Thomson’s argument is valid‚ thus making the original argument that abortion is morally impermissible‚ false in certain cases‚ and also rejecting the original premise that was made. Thomoson uses the premise that
Premium Abortion Abortion debate Murder
Abortion The main pro-life against abortion argument goes like this: Killing a human life is wrong and a fetus is a human life; therefore‚ killing a fetus is wrong. However‚ the debate is always surrounded by the second premise which is: at what point of a pregnancy is a fetus a human being. As medical science and technology progress‚ the line might shift back and forth. For the sake of this argument‚ I will neglect the second premise; I will say that a fetus is a human being at the time of conception
Premium Human Abortion Decision making
Abortion should be morally permissible‚ in most cases‚ because a women’s right to her own body neutralizes the unfortunate circumstance of an aborted fetus. Abortion should only be impermissible if it is justified that a woman is getting multiple pregnancies and abortions without making use or effort of contraceptives. A common argument against abortion is that a fetus is a human being from the moment of conception. This premise is a slippery slope because it claims that life of a person is continuous
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Fetus
Philosophy 1001-001 A Defense of Abortion in Pregnancy Reduction In this paper I will discuss the relevance of J.J. Thomson’s argument in her article‚ A Defense of Abortion‚ to that of pregnancy reduction and if there is any relevance‚ if there are exceptions or situations where that might change. J.J. Thomson’s argument in A Defense of Abortion is that the one thing a person has rights to is his/her body and the right to control what happens with it. Thomson also states that there is an innate
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Reproduction
Thomson wrote a paper titled A Defense of Abortion which supports my view that abortion is permissible. An argument when it comes to people’s views on abortion is whether or not they believe the fetus is a person. If we could just come to a conclusion on this it would be simple right‚ if fetuses are people then abortions are impermissible‚ and if fetuses are not people then abortions are permissible. This is not the case though and many people who do defend abortion say that the fetus is not a person
Premium
Philosophy 4: Intro to Ethics Essay 1 In Thomson’s paper “A defense of Abortion‚” she argues that abortion is morally permissible in some cases. Within the subject of abortion is the circular argument of if a fetus should be classified‚ and therefor given the same rights‚ as a person. One of the common opinions among lawmakers is that a fetus’s classification as a person begins at its viability. Others argue that a fetus is a person at the first sign of brain activity. There is no way to definitive
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
Conscientious Objection Case Summery Mr. Harry Rogers is a pharmacist working at a small community hospital for six years. He made a request concerning Conscientious Objection based on his new religious beliefs. One of the main functions of a pharmacist is to dispense medications. Harry Rogers chose to be a pharmacist prior to his religious conversion. However‚ his new beliefs are conflicting with his duties on the grounds of filling up abortion drugs as well as filling prescriptions for a physician
Premium Patient Health care Medicine
my first philosophy class I have ever taken‚ certain arguments grabbed my attention more than others. Of these‚ the argument and position presented by Judith Jarvis Thomson in “A Defense of Abortion” caused me to rethink my view on the topic. Raised in a politically conservative environment‚ the argument against abortion I most commonly heard was that fetuses are people and should be afforded rights
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human rights
In her paper‚ Defence of Abortion‚ Judith Jarvis Thomson takes a more “pro-choice” approach and argues for the justification of abortion in more circumstances than not. She does this by using different thought experiments that align with different situations in which women can get pregnant. While I agree with her reasonings for the first two circumstances talked about in her paper‚ I disagree with her justification for getting pregnant while using protection. I believe that even though inconvenient
Premium