Week 3 IW “Discretion & Court Cases” Discretion & Court Cases Discretion varies in each profession just as it does in each jurisdiction. It is how a person in an authoritative position conducts themselves and what they do in accordance with their profession and with ethical obligations as well as the law. Disparity is a major player in the terms of discretion which includes Race‚ Ethnicity‚ Gender‚ and Age. First and foremost society has set the mind frame for this which
Premium Law Police Appeal
the prosecutor and lack of knowledge of his lawyer. The case was rather built upon his lack of feelings towards his mother’s death and his choice not to believe in God. Typically‚ throughout a trial‚ the defendant is given time on the witness stand to plea innocence‚ and explain why he committed the crime. Meursault‚ however‚ stood before the judge and was asked yes or no questions. This left him with little or no time to plead his case. Before he could say anything else‚ he was back on his
Premium Question Judge Separation of powers
Defending The Customer’s Personal Data Kanjuette Wakefield Customer Relations and Servicing – 1 Professor Lori Wortylko August 6‚ 2013 Defend an organization’s right to collect customer’s data. Should the company limit the use of this information? I am choosing to talk about Wal-Mart and the way they choose to protect the customer’s data that is collected when a customer uses a credit or debit card or a check at Wal-Mart. This establishment is here to protect the rights and concerns
Premium Customer service
formation of the United States‚ landmark court cases have helped shape the laws of the country. Many factors determine the outcome of these cases such as the morality of the justices and the mind set of the generation it occurred during. For example‚ extremely conservative Supreme Court justices are not going to vote in favor of a liberal court cases. These factors were what decided the outcome of Planned Parenthood v. Casey. One way to understand the outcome of a case is to understand the people involved
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Planned Parenthood v. Casey United States Constitution
Throughout my experience with tragic plays‚ I started to like some of the ideas‚ concepts and moral beliefs of these plays. Reading works from William Shakespeare like Othello and now Hamlet it was easy to understand the messages he was trying to portray. After reading and analyzing Both Othello and Hamlet‚ I came to the conclusion that Shakespeare is a dramatist who writes about tragic and unfortunate drama. Therefore‚ the quote “Hamlet is a noble prince who suffers from a corrupt world that is
Free Hamlet
reason I chose the Supreme Court case Browder vs. Gayle was because of its segregation. In the early nineteen hundreds blacks and whites were separated‚ if they were to walk into a restaurant they had to sit in the back‚ the blacks had different bathrooms than the whites‚ and they weren’t near as clean or high in class as for the whites were. And this was a time when everybody was supposed to be “equal”. There were several cases that blacks have tried to reach the Supreme Court but end up falling a little
Premium Rosa Parks United States Supreme Court of the United States
and the probation officer serving the drug court managed mixed caseloads of both drug court and non-drug court participants. ARI funding allows the probation officer and a contract defense attorney to focus solely on the needs of drug court offender. Evidence-based/promising practices in use: LSI-R assessment‚ cognitive-behavioral therapy‚ Thinking for a Change curriculum‚ drug court Target population and reduction goals: Knox County has operated a drug court since 2008. From 2007 to 2009‚ Knox County
Premium Criminology Prison Criminal justice
of creating a separate juvenile court was to keep adolescents out of adult prisons‚ limit their exposure to adult criminal activity and poor role models‚ and also to provide guidance that helps them to turn away from further criminal behavior and be directed toward more positive results. It seemed that the individual juvenile offender cases were not getting looked at based on the individual characteristics or needs of the offender‚ rather whomever prosecuted the case was determining it based on the
Premium Crime Criminology Juvenile delinquency
1. This story is about the Supreme Court’s decision. What process did this case have to go through to get to the Supreme Court? Before cases reach the state of transitioning into a lawsuit‚ a dispute most likely has transpired between parties that had some sort of business or contractual relationship. In this case‚ Betty Dukes was an employee of Wal-Mart‚ Inc. who complained about the disparities she encountered as a female employee opposed to the male co-workers. Usually‚ lawsuits can be avoided
Premium Discrimination Gender Employment
Court of Appeals of Virginia Axel Foley v. Commonwealth of Virginia _______________________ PETITION FOR APPEAL _______________________ Lawyer Name: Rowan Tully Lawyer’s Responsibility: Nature of the Case Statements of Facts‚ and parts of the Argument Lawyer Name: Elizabeth Gadd Lawyer’s Responsibility: Proceedings in the Trial Court‚ Assignments of Error‚ Parts of “Argument”. TABLE OF CONTENTS NATURE OF THE CASE – Brief summary of the case PG 2 STATEMENTS OF FACTS – Brief description
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Jury