$200 an hour. Most court appointed attorneys don’t get to meet with their clients often‚ usually meeting only a few times before the trial. Because the court appointed attorneys don’t get to meet with their clients as much as a paid lawyer‚ the defendant doesn’t always get the best representation. Also due to the lack of meeting time‚ court appointed attorneys are more likely to push for a plea deal than to take the case to trial. Plea deals are also another way that the poor have unequal access
Premium Lawyer Law Judge
Without engaging in the proper analysis‚ it is inaccurate to say that the plaintiff’s complaint cannot deprive the defendant of a jury trial. Where the main thrust of the action is equitable‚ the defendant does not have a right to a jury on the incidental legal issues arising in the main action. Though the analysis does not change‚ the results truly become divergent when defenses and counterclaims are
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff Common law
Talbot‚ Phelan v. Gardner‚ Marron v. Marron Case Briefs Jennifer Beverly PA205-02 Professor Byron Grim June 20‚ 2011 Case Briefs Citation: Swan v. Talbot‚ 152 Cal. 142 (Cal. 1907) Facts: George Swan‚ plaintiff‚ sold James R. Talbot‚ defendant‚ a portion of personal property. Swan was inebriated at the time the deal was prepared. The portion of the property sold to Talbot was valued at $21‚949.86. Talbot paid Swan $10‚604.32‚ this included $200 in coin that was paid to Swan at the time
Premium Appeal
houses‚ etc.); and departments of corrections (responsible for some or all probation‚ parole‚ and custodial functions). Some jurisdictions also have a sentencing guidelines commission. Other important public and private actors in this system include: defendants; private defense attorneys; bail bondsmen; other private agencies providing assistance‚ supervision‚ or treatment of offenders; and victims and groups or officials representing or assisting them (e.g.‚ crime victim compensation boards). In addition
Free Criminal law
FACTS OF THE CASE Southern Fairway Investments Pty. Ltd.‚ and Jakabar Pty Ltd (second defendant‚ and it being a wholly subsidiary company from the First Defendant) performed a Memorandum of Understanding or “MOU”. The MOU was executed in the way of a “deed” on the 12 of June 2008 where the parties would “use reasonable endeavours to negotiate by 30 august 2008 (and in any event no later than 30 October 2008) a Gas Supply Agreement” with the purpose to end of entering into a GSA (Gas Supply Agreement)
Premium Contract Law Corporation
MUST MEET FULL CODE TEST Evidential Stage – Ensure sufficient evidence to anticipate a realistic prospect of conviction against each defendant on each charge‚ and the jury will be more likely to convict as a result. The CPS will encourage police to use ACPO guidance to gather a wide range of evidence. Public Interest Stage – Conviction is more likely to result in a significant sentence if the:- • Offence involved a weapon or threat of violence • Offence was carried out in the presence of a child
Premium Bail Crime Domestic violence
and should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. In accordance to the Penal Law‚ Murder in the first degree is defined “With intent to cause the death of another person‚ he causes the death of such person… the victim was killed while the defendant was in the course of committing / attempting to commit in furtherance of robbery [or other such felonies.]{§125.27(1)(a)(vii)}” This is also known as Felony Murder. Robbery is also defined as forcible stealing. On February 14th 2011 in a small
Premium Crime Theft Murder
by Paul in the situation above.How successful might any defences be? The tort in Rylands v Fletcher(1868) came into being as a result of the Industrial Revolution which took place during the eighteenth century.In Rylands v Fletcher(1868)‚ the defendant‚ a mill owner. Had paid independent contractors to make a reservoir on his land‚ which was intended to supply water to the mill.During the construction‚ the contractors discovered the shafts and passages of an old coal mine situated on neighbouring
Premium Nuisance Tort Rylands v Fletcher
) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES‚ INC.‚ ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable Local Rules of the United State District Court for the Northern District of Illinois‚ Defendant‚ by its counsel‚ moves this court for the entry of an order compelling the Plaintiff to fully comply with the Defendant’s
Premium United States Civil procedure Lawyer
INTRODUCTION By virtue of Section 11 of the Contracts Act‚ only persons who are of the age of majority according to the law to which they are subject are competent to contract. However‚ there are certain statutory exceptions to the rule that all contracts entered into by minors are void. These exceptions are found in the Age of Majority Act 1971 Contracts(Amendment) Act 1976‚ relating to scholarship agreements‚ and the Children and Young Persons(Employment) Act 1966. What is minor
Premium Contract Marriage Breach of contract