Week 2 Discussion 1 Deductive Language Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then‚ construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form. Discussion 2 Inductive Language Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then‚ explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger‚ either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. Week 1 Discussion 1 Consider an argument
Premium Logic Argument Inductive reasoning
CTS Placement Paper January‚ 2010 (Reasoning Ability) REASONING section (20 Q’s - 20 mins) Directions for Questions 1-4: In each questions below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. read the conclusion and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements‚ disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer: (A)
Premium Reasoning Conclusion
Deductive and Inductive Arguments Assignment # Course name Your name School name Prof’s name 04/09/2015 According to the definition of deductive argument‚ it described the structure of a specific kind of argument; a deductive argument is an argument is an argument that attempts to prove its conclusion necessarily. Loosely verbalizing‚ if the author’s operation of logical thinking is a good one‚ if the premises authentically do provide this scarcely justification for the conclusion‚ then
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning
Legal Reasoning is a reasonable reasoning before the decision had been made. Legal reasoning required us to consider the criteria beyond those imposed by the strict necessity of logic. It has followed certain criteria or rules which applied in practical reasoning. For an example‚ a judge has to give judgment by following the precedent case and Federal Constitution‚ legislators have to predict the impact of their laws before amendment whereby following the two-third majority of Parliament and lawyers
Premium Logic Reasoning
1) Charles doesn’t tell Chig right away about his plan to visit his family. This idea or implication can help in deducing an inference of Charles’s feelings about the visit. For instance‚ when someone doesn’t tell right away about his/her plan to visit a certain location‚ he/she doesn’t really seem filled with excitement‚ anticipation‚ or even happiness. As a result‚ there could be a critical or momentous reason for doing that such as having the presence of a conflict or enigma. Similarly‚ Charles
Premium Reasoning Thought Logic
INDUCTIVE & DEDUCTIVE RESEARCH APPROACH BY: MOHD TAJUDIN B JAMALUDIN Contents Definition Methods Inductive teaching deductive teaching Examples of inductive & deductive Advantages Disadvantages Conclusion Definition INDUCTIVE: Inductive teaching (also called discovery teaching or inquiry teaching) is based on the claim that knowledge is build primarily from a learner’s experiences and interactions with phenomena. Definition DEDUCTIVE Deductive teaching
Free Scientific method Inductive reasoning Logic
outcomes. RELATED ARTICLES A Mixed Method Design Deductive and Inductive Reasoning The Raven Paradox - How Hempel’s Treatise Led to Questioning of the Inductive Reasoning Process The scientific method Teaching methods can either be inductive or deductive or some combination of the two. The inductive teaching method or process goes from the specific to the general and may be based on specific experiments or experimental learning exercises. Deductive teaching method progresses from general concept
Premium Reasoning Inductive reasoning Deductive reasoning
INDUCTIVE REASONING An inductive reasoning test measures abilities that are important in solving problems. They may also be referred to as abstract reasoning tests or diagrammatic style tests. These tests measure the ability to work flexibly with unfamiliar information and find solutions. People who perform well on these tests tend to have a greater capacity to think conceptually as well as analytically. ABDUCTIVE REASONING Abduction is a kind of logical inference described by Charles Sanders
Premium Logic Scientific method Abductive reasoning
Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then‚ construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form. Your initial post should be at least 150 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7. When responding to your classmates‚ consider why the sound deductive argument might be seen by some as being valid but not sound. Pistachios are very addictive‚ Mike eats a lot of pistachio ice cream because
Premium Inductive reasoning Logic Deductive reasoning
Nosich’s “The Elements of Reasoning” and Elder’s “The Standards for Thinking” both focus on various techniques people can adopt to become better critical thinkers. According to Nosich‚ two conditions must exist to be considered critical thinking: the thinking must be reflective and it must meet high standards. These two conditions lead us into the eights elements of reasoning presented in the readings. The first element focused on is “Purpose‚” which includes objectives‚ goals‚ your desired outcome
Premium Critical thinking Thought Logic