: SQQP 5023 COURSE NAME : DECISION ANALYSIS LECTURER : DR. SYARIZA ABDUL RAHMAN email: syariza@uum.edu.my tel: 04 – 9286975/ 016-4127923 1. COURSE SYNOPSIS Mathematical tools have been applied for thousands of years; however‚ the formal study and application of quantitative techniques to practical decision making is largely a product of the twentieth century. Decision analysis refers to a body of techniques that allows a decision-maker to evaluate uncertainty‚ risk
Premium Operations research Decision theory Scientific method
The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation‚ the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom‚ 2002). Also‚ additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also
Premium Mental disorder Crime Psychology
Decision Making Analysis Gary Stone MGT/230 February 9‚ 2015 Dr. Erica Richmond Decision Making Analysis The decision making process that Anne Mulcahy followed save Xerox in my opinion. The company was at the brink of bankruptcy and the longtime employee‚ now turned president and CEO made great strides to prevent that from happening. After viewing the video‚ and collaborating with my group‚ I agree that Anne did an excellent job with Xerox and patched all the holes in the sinking ship. One of
Premium Decision making Risk Decision theory
PP. 41-56 ‚ EBSCOhost [Online]. Available from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liv.ac.uk/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=d223ab04-454e-417e-a2c6-6d7ccccf8c41%40sessionmgr4003&hid=4211 (Accessed on: 25 May 2014). Porter‚ M. E. (2003). Strategy and the Internet. Harward Business review [Online]. Available from:
Premium Strategic management Management
Business Ethics Case BUS 415 February 26‚ 2012 Business Ethics Case: Lawsuits In every business ethics lawsuit there are many questions that must be answered. The first question that a person or organization wanting to sue must ask is if he or she has standing to sue. According to this law “the plaintiff must have some stake in the outcome of the lawsuit” (Cheeseman‚ 2010‚ p. 43). If the plaintiff does not have this they cannot bring the suit to court. The next question that must be determined
Premium Lawsuit Plaintiff Question
ground laws are a legitimate expansion of the doctrine of self- defense. Stand your ground laws means that a person if fearful of their own life and cannot escape‚ they can fight using self-defense. Looking at the resolution I made an observation. According to Thomas Hobbes since people fear death‚ he says that people only have a right to life and that the state would protect them to help sustain that right‚ as in this case self-defense. So in theory‚ people only have a right to life and the state
Free Political philosophy Government Thomas Hobbes
Leo Southwood (Professor Name) (Type of Course) June 19‚ 2013 Analysis on William A. Henry III’s “In Defense of Elitism” Elitism" is a term that has always made me just a bit uneasy. I have never believed that I needed that label to verify my status as professor of English‚ as editor of one of the most respected of scholarly journals‚ or as literary critic. I chide those of my students who assume that reading Ulysses or even Finnegans Wake makes them part of an intellectual elite. I do not believe
Premium Elite Oligarchy Samuel Beckett
Plato’s "Defense of Socrates" follows the trial of Socrates for charges of corruption of the youth. His accuser‚ Meletus‚ claims he is doing so by teaching the youth of Athens of a separate spirituality from that which was widely accepted. Socrates’ argument was unique in that he tried to convince the jury he was just an average man and not to be feared‚ but in actuality demonstrated how clever and tenacious he was. He begins with an anecdote of his visit to the Oracle of Delphi‚ which told him
Premium Plato
Criminal Defense Duschek Juarez CJA 354 Kristin Mildenberger February 24‚ 2014 Upon reading this paper‚ you will be able to identify the different kinds of criminal defenses used in a court of law. Factual defense is the legal defense that offers two groups an excuse and justification for their actions. In justification‚ the six groups are self-defense‚ consent‚ resisting unlawful arrest‚ defense against others‚ necessity defense‚ and defense of property and home.
Free Law Lawyer Criminal law
For years‚ the insanity defense has developed and turned into a difficult but sometime successful defense system in a court of law. The exact law changes from state to state however the main idea remains the same. The insanity defense could apply or be used on a person who is considered legally insane. They must have a severe mental disease or defect and must prove they were at the time of the crime‚ legally insane. Also said person has to prove they didn’t know the impact‚ quality or the nature
Premium Crime Law Capital punishment