Schmidt‚ A. Sheth‚ K. Verma‚ "Web Service Semantics - WSDL-S‚" A joint UGA-IBM Technical Note‚ version 1.0‚ April 18‚ 2005. http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/METEOR-S/WSDL-S Web Service Semantics - WSDL-S Technical Note Version 1.0 April‚ 2005 Authors (alphabetically): Rama Akkiraju‚ IBM Research Joel Farrell‚ IBM Software Group John Miller‚ LSDIS Lab‚ University of Georgia Meenakshi Nagarajan‚ LSDIS Lab‚ University of Georgia Marc-Thomas Schmidt‚ IBM Software Group Amit Sheth‚ LSDIS
Premium XML World Wide Web Service system
Statements 17 1. Scope of the Analysis 17 2. Examining Credit Worthiness of IBM 17 2.1.1. Short Term Paying Ability 17 2.1.2. Long Term Solvency 22 3. Examining IBM Stock as a Investment Opportunity 23 Part 3: Conclusion 25 References 27 Appendix 1: Calculations for Financial Analysis 28 Part 1: Qualitative Analysis 1. Company Profile International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)‚ founded in 1911‚ is an American multinational technology and consulting corporation
Premium Balance sheet
IBM ANALYSIS PURPOSE In the following paper I am going to analyze the case about “IBM” and how the company changed its structure in order to develop innovative products and manage successfully its new business as well. In particular IBM moved from a bureaucratic structure with an inflexible hierarchy to a divisional structure that allowed the company to pursue emerging business opportunities and at the same time continue to develop businesses were mature and well established‚ and business were
Premium Organizational structure
In IBM: * Early 1990’s: decentralized geographic and functional departments * Mid-late 1990’s: Distribution and logistics functions centralized into a global organization with world-wide responsibility * Early 2000’s: merger of Customer Fulfillment‚ Procurement‚ Manufacturing‚ and Global Logistics/Distribution functions into a new global Integrated Supply Chain function * Result: cost savings of $5.6B in 2002 and $7B in 2003 * A Case study on IBM * IBM developed
Premium Supply chain management
customers) - Right investment to S/360 - Success of PC - Great reputation -> attract top talent Factors led to its problems during the late 1980 and earry1990s: - Did not keep in touch with customers - Didn’t understand market need (fewer purchase IBM mainframes) - Marketing effort missed the mark - Turf battles between autonomous divisions - Spending too much on fixed cost (building‚ data processing cost‚ ..) - Management IT problems such as poor internal IT problems - Products complexity and
Premium Management IBM Mainframe computer
Case Study: The Evolving Strategy at IBM IBM was a strong company in the 1970’s but as time went by‚ the company culture failed to keep up with the time‚ focusing on consensus decision making. Strong Culture throughout the 1970’s allowed them to be successful‚ add values in consensus decision making and allows everyone to add input. Eventually they were able to comeback. On the other hand‚ they failed to keep with the times; company has history of slow confrontation of new technological approaches
Free Globalization
the slicker and responsive rivals such as Microsoft‚ Dell and Oracle‚ IBM had to push the awake call alert to reposition itself as one of the significant player in the industry. This all been done through the ingenious and new paradigm of advertising series on which could reinstate the big blue stigma. The transformation process that could penetrate the existing market with the new products (refer to tangible and intangible of IBM outcome) known as the product penetration strategy can be best served
Premium Marketing Brand Advertising
1. IBM as a product centric organization before its near failure was a bloated organization with 400 000 employees heavily invested in low margin‚ transactional‚ commodity-based businesses. As technology progressed‚ the demand for IBM’s inventions began to diminish. The entire organizational structure was also growing redundant‚ making it more challenging to face off competition from smaller and less diversified competitors. As Louis Gerstner‚ Jr embarked on turning the entire company around‚ there
Premium Globalization Emerging markets IBM
Mission Statement-Suitability for IBM The mission statement of IBM is suitable for the organization‚ and that not only because it sufficiently refers to the features a mission statement must have‚ but also because it expresses a spirit of success‚ teamwork and customer consideration‚ a spirit that only big companies can generate. Mission Statement-Strengths and weaknesses Though much important a mission stetement is‚ it can develop some strengths and weaknesses regarding mostly the customers
Premium Customer service Information technology Customer
Executive Summary IBM and Accenture are both huge companies and uses five factor DuPont analysis to achieve a return on equity. IBM has a higher return on equity than Accenture‚ and therefore the management are more efficient in generating shareholder value per dollar invested. However both the companies are performing better than the industry average. IBM does also take lesser number of days to convert cash on hand compared to Accenture and industry average. But‚ Accenture is taking more days
Premium Balance sheet Financial ratios Corporate finance