board Time Available You have 15 minutes to make your presentation and afterwards there will be a short period following the presentation to take questions from the board. Your presentation and supporting documents will be assessed according to the criteria below. For your work to be assessed you must; have mailed one copy of your presentation to ray.donnelly@londonmet.ac.uk‚ or E.Ohohe@londonmet.ac.uk by 10.00am on the morning of the presentation together with your Contribution Log and the signed
Free Disruptive technology Innovation Wal-Mart
Who Says‚ Chapter Five: “The Wikipedia Problem: Evaluating and Trusting Sources in a Digital Age” By Deborah Holdstein and Danielle Aquillne The author stating how sites like Google and Wikipedia could have more negative effect than positive: “[…] it’s also important to consider the ways that both Google and Wikipedia have in some ways been a detriment to our intellectual lives.” (51) A comparison to convenience vs. creditability: “[…] that is‚ good research takes time‚ and‚ while information may
Premium Internet World Wide Web Psychology
Name: Kimberly Ann B. Magtibay Gr. & Section: VII- Copernicus Teacher: Mrs. Ma. Teresita Abcede Date: November 8‚ 2012 ACTIVITY 12 GROUNDWATER MOVEMENT OBJECTIVE At the end of the activity‚ you should be able to observe how water flows through different soil materials and find out which soil or rock materials are aquifers or aquitards. MATERIALS * 3 cylinders (like a 500 mL graduated cylinder‚ but without
Premium Water Groundwater Water cycle
* * * Evaluating the Research Process Vicki Turner HCS/465 Radha Ramjattan March 13‚ 2012 * * * * * * * * Literature review used in this research * The most important steps in a research project or study is accomplishing a literature review. A literature review is the process of gathering information from other sources and documenting it. This is not a report or a statement verbatim according to Creative Research Systems (2010). A literature
Premium Scientific method Academic publishing Research
Establishing evaluation criteria is needed to evaluate alternatives and to make decisions. Depending on the nature of the problem different constraints may be used to design a policy. Once evaluating a clear criterion‚ we must go through a process of identifying alternatives that will later be evaluated in the terms of criteria. Evaluation criteria are grouped in four categories‚ identified by Bardach. For each policy problem‚ we should be able to identify relevant criteria in each category. They
Premium Cost-benefit analysis Costs Cost
GENERAL PAPER GUIDELINES Government 2305-DL Duane Emmons‚ InstructorTelephone # 281-998-6150‚ ext. 7254 Office N7.113 Objectives of the Writing Assignment Learn about a current not historical political issue or problem Develop your Internet and library research skills. Evaluate your topic from the perspective of different cultures and viewpoints as well as your own. Improve your writing and critical thinking skills. Topic Selection You are to choose your own topic that involves American
Premium United States Constitution United States Government
Childhood Obesity Evaluating the Research Process HCS/465-Health Care Research Utilization September 17‚ 2012 Kerrie Kelly Ji Li‚ PhD and Neal Hooker‚ PhD conducted a study on the links of childhood obesity and children who are enrolled in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP)‚ School Breakfast Program (SBP)‚ clubs such as sports and others‚ and different living and household factors. This study utilized the conceptual framework of the literature review from the National Survey of Children’s
Premium Body mass index High school Public school
Area | * What Should Be Assessed? | Lesson Objectives | * Alignment to rigorous standards * Clarity of lesson objectives * Differentiation of lesson objectives | Lesson Strategies‚ Activities‚ and Delivery | * Activation of students’ prior knowledge * Use of strategies that are appropriate for the lesson objectives * Use of activities and student work that engage students as active learners * Differentiation of strategies‚ activities‚ and student work to ensure that all students
Premium Knowledge Educational psychology Special needs
Evaluating a Website for Credibility Rebekah Reed Chamberlain College of Nursing NR500: Foundation Concepts and Applications Fall 2012 Evaluating a Website for Credibility With so many health-related websites on the internet it was hard to choose one. I settled on one that is personal to me and that I do a lot of teaching on with patients. I chose American Diabetes Association at www.diabetes.org. This website is found by searching any of the search engines. This website has both a consumers
Premium Patient Health care Health care provider
two websites which will be used in this writer’s research in upcoming months: 1) http://www.asperger-institute.com/‚ and 2) http://www.yourlittleprofessor.com/adhd.html. The Websites For the purposes of this assignment and future research‚ this writer chose two websites which posted information and articles about autism‚ attention deficit disorder‚ and Asperger’s Syndrome. She chose those websites because they dovetailed with her research into the effects of the characteristics of those disorders
Premium Website Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder Grand Canyon