Year 12 Legal Studies Crime Assessment Steven Fraser - R v Fraser - Murder of children Legal Citation: R v Fraser [2003] NSWSC 965 and R v Fraser [2004] NSWSC 53 Elements of the Offence: Steven Fraser murdered his three children – Ashley (7)‚ Ryan (5)‚ and Jarrod (4) – on the weekend of the 18 – 19 August‚ 2001. They were staying in his Caringbah apartment on a custody visit‚ where Steven was living after separating with his wife Maria Chona two months prior. Ryan and Jarrod were given doses
Premium Murder Crime Capital punishment
Criminal Law Paper Gaby Rielle CJA/354 Criminal Law August 12‚ 2014 Mendi Leigh Criminal Law Paper Maryland v. King‚ 569 U.S.‚ on June 3‚ 2013 the United States Supreme Court ruled that it is not a violation of the fourth amendment right by having your DNA swabbed while being booked into a detention facility. And that a simple swab on the inner cheek was no different than taking a photo or being finger printed during the booking process. This case came to be after an individual was arrested
Premium Criminal law Crime Supreme Court of the United States
Criminal Law Paper In this essay I will be discussing the case of David Bobby‚ Warden vs. Archie Dixon‚ I will express my feelings of the case and what caught made me interested in the case I selected. The sources‚ purposes and jurisdictions of the criminal law related to this case will also me mentioned within this essay‚ I will define accomplice liability and criminal liability and express how it relates to the case that I will be discussing. The difference between the various elements of crime
Free Criminal law
According to Robin J.A. in Malette v Shulman[1]‚ “the right of self-determination which underlies the doctrine of informed consent also obviously encompasses the right to refuse medical treatment. A competent adult is generally entitled to reject a specific treatment or all treatment‚ or to select an alternate form of treatment‚ even if the decision may entail risks as serious as death…The doctrine of informed consent is plainly intended to ensure the freedom of individuals to make choices concerning
Premium Religion Causality Blood transfusion
Case Brief By: Ashley Tam R. v. Martineau (1991)‚ 58 C.C.C. (3d) 353 (S.C.C.) Facts: The appellant‚ Martineau‚ was convicted of second-degree murder under s. 213(a) and (d) of the Criminal Code but the decision was overturned by the Alberta Court of Appeal who concluded that s. 213(a) violated ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and could no longer be in effect. The issue was brought before the Supreme Court of Canada whether or not the appeal court was correct in
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Abortion Canada
Criminal Law Evaluation Paper Adrienne Anderson CJA/354 March 7‚ 2011 William Mosley Criminal Law Evaluation Paper Criminal law defines what conduct is considered criminal. The law defines the acts that may lead to an arrest‚ prosecution‚ and imprisonment. (Schmalleger‚ 2010). Criminal law protects society from harm‚ punishes individuals who have broken the law‚ maintains social order‚ rehabilitates offenders‚ and deters criminal activity (Schmalleger‚ 2010). The sources of criminal law
Premium Criminal law
ACL REFERENCE MUST BE USED In Ferguson v Walkley (2008) 17 VR 647‚ Harper J said (at [1])‚ “The principles of democratic governance have had difficulty in accommodating laws designed to deal with offensive behaviour — with which I include offensive language.” Later in that same case‚ Harper J observed (at [5])‚ “According to Professors Bronitt and McSherry‚ “[c]riminalising offensive language or conduct has the potential to interfere with the freedom of expression‚ assembly and association protected
Premium Law Human rights Crime
R. v Burns case Brief Case Facts The defendants Glen Sebastian Burns and Atif Ahmad Rafay were accused to have committed aggravated first degree murder in Washington State. In a confession to an undercover RCMP officer in British Columbia‚ posing as a mob boss‚ it is clamed that Burns was a contract killer hired by Rafay to kill his parents so that Rafay could get insurance money for their deaths. It is claimed that Burns beat the victims with a baseball bat while Rafay watched (para.10). They
Premium Appeal Crime Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Concept Application of Concept to the Issue of Downloading Reference to Concept in Reading Civil Law & Criminal Law Downloading music illegally can be brought under the envelope of either the civil law or the criminal law. The individual(s) or the entity(ies) that own the property(music) can file a civil lawsuit against the website that offers music for downloading. In other case a criminal case can be brought against those who download and use the music. “Civil cases may include suits
Premium Law Copyright Criminal law
Case: R v. Hebert Facts of Case Judges: Dickson‚ Robert George Brian; Lamer‚ Antonio; Wilson‚ Bertha; La Forest‚ Gérard V.; L’Heureux-Dubé‚ Claire; Sopinka‚ John; Gonthier‚ Charles Doherty; Cory‚ Peter deCarteret; McLachlin‚ Beverley Neil Hebert was suspected of having robbed the Klondike Inn. After the police located Hebert‚ they placed him under arrest and informed him of his rights‚ and took him to the R.C.M.P detachment in Whitehorse. Hebert contacted counsel and obtained legal advice regarding
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Police