1. What is the history and development of the juvenile court and justice process? The history of the juvenile court and system dates back to the year 1824 in the United States‚ which was “The House of Refuge” in New York. “The House of Refuge was the first juvenile house of the United States. In 1899‚ Cook County in the state of Illinois established the first juvenile court. Youth in the juvenile court system dating back before the year of 1967 did not have constitutional legal rights. It was not
Premium Police Crime United States Constitution
FINAL RESEARCH PAPER THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: PROPOSALS FOR LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM Abstract: This paper deals with the role of the Constitutional court of the Republic of Macedonia in building constitutionalism. For that purpose‚ the concept of constitutionalism and two competences of the Constitutional court are analyzed: judicial review and the competence to decide on demands for protection of some rights (quasi-constitutional complaint)
Premium Law Constitution
CHAPTER – IV THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT‚ 1971: A CRITIQUE 1.1 INTRODUCTION After discussing concept‚ historical background and constitutional aspect in the proceeding chapters‚ an attempt has been made in this chapter to discuss in detail the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act‚ 1971. Rule of Law is the basic principle of governance of any civilized and democratic society. The principle asserts supremacy of law bringing under its purview everyone‚ individuals and institutions at par
Premium Common law Judge Court
61) Plea bargaining became common sometime after the Civil War. The proliferation of cases‚ in the federal courts‚ brought on by prohibition was instrumental in the institutionalization of plea bargaining. (Neubauer‚ 2002‚ p. 323) It was not until the sixties that plea bargaining became a topic of controversy. This controversy seems to stem from the fact that the name suggests that the courts are bargaining with criminals. But "much of what is characterized as ’plea bargaining ’ often involves the
Premium Criminal law Law Crime
structure of the English courts within which a decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower in the hierarchy. However‚ there have been occasions where the Court of Appeal departed from the decisions of the House of Lords this has been treated with hostility by the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeal is bound by decisions of the House of Lords even if it considers them to be wrong. It was also bound by its own decision‚ however in Young v Bristol Aeroplane‚ the Court of Appeal held that
Premium Stare decisis Case law
Federal Jurisdiction Henry‚ a resident of Nevada‚ sued Adam‚ a resident of Utah in the Federal Court in California. He sought $60‚000 damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident that occurred in Los Angeles‚ California. Does the Federal Court have jurisdiction? No the federal court does not have jurisdiction over this case. In order for this case to fall within the guidelines of a federal suit it would have to qualify for diversity of citizenship. Diversity of citizenship exists
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Home | Sitemap | Questions‚ Comments ------------------------------------------------- Social and political movements in the Philippines Collection ------------------------------------------------- History ------------------------------------------------- Content ------------------------------------------------- Administrative information ------------------------------------------------- CONTENTS ------------------------------------------------- INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------
Premium Philippines Human rights
Court Observation Paper Debra Manning BUSI 301-D10 LUO Professor Richard West Courtroom Observation This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White‚ represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern‚ represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against
Premium United States Jury Appeal
AMAN‚ Ayumi Kyoko C. Our country today experiences a lot of social issues. Ever since‚ I have observed and witnessed the continuous growth of these issues through television‚ the internet and I have read some articles on the newspapers. The three issues I will cite‚ for me‚ are continuously growing and haven’t yet had the solution. Poverty may be the most common social issue in most countries. When I was a kid‚ I used to think of us as “poor” because of the experienced bankruptcy with our previous
Premium Experience Poverty Social exclusion
State and Federal Courts State Court System: I.)Lower courts or courts of limited jurisdiction: Lower courts first and foremost handle small criminal issues‚ for instance prostitution‚ traffic violations‚ and preliminary phases on felony cases. The parliamentary periods of any felony cases are in charge of arraignments‚ bail hearings‚ and so on. Lower courts can also distribute warrants to the local and state police departments for search and seizure’s. II.) Trial courts of general jurisdiction:
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Appeal