Pike v. Aurora The issue at hand in this case is whether or not the town ordinance is constitutional. To determine this‚ there are a number of questions that must be asked and laws that must be examined. The first step in determining the constitutionality is knowing and understanding the enumerated powers given to congress under the constitution. Enumerated powers are specific powers listed in the constitution that congress can exercise. If a power is not specifically listed in the constitution
Premium United States Congress United States Constitution Commerce Clause
One Supreme Court member that stands out from the rest would have to be John Marshall. There is no doubt about this because he made the Supreme Court a co-equal branch of government. This means that it was an equal branch to the legislative and the executive. He became a Supreme Court Justice in 1801 and was appointed by John Adams. While holding his position he set three major goals that set precedents and made him the most significant Supreme Court Justice ever. Marshall strengthened the national
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Introduction There have been many Supreme Court cases that dealed with many concepts of the law‚ like obscenity for example. As a matter of fact‚ obscenity is a concept that Miller v. California deals with. To be more specific‚ this case deals with what is considered obscene‚ and if the specific obscenity mentioned in this case is protected by the first amendment‚ the freedom of speech. I will now explain this case in more depth. What brought this case about? In 1973‚ Marvin Miller‚ operator
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity Supreme Court of the United States
Calculating Tank Volume Saving time‚ increasing accuracy By Dan Jones‚ Ph.D.‚ P.E. C alculating fluid volume in a horizontal or vertical cylindrical or elliptical tank can be complicated‚ depending on fluid height and the shape of the heads (ends) of a horizontal tank or the bottom of a vertical tank. Exact equations now are available for several commonly encountered tank shapes. These equations can be used to make rapid and accurate fluid-volume calculations. All equations are rigorous‚
Premium Volume
Personally‚ I agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case of R. v. Dyment. Particularly‚ with La Forest J. commentary it provided on the importance of privacy: “…society has come to realize that privacy is at the heart of liberty in modern state…Grounded in man’s physical and moral autonomy privacy is essential for the well being of the individual. For this reason alone‚ it is worthy of constitutional protection‚ but it also has profound significance for the public order. The restraints
Premium Law Human rights United States Constitution
What is the difference between lawful trickery and unlawful coercion according to the 1990 Supreme Court decision in Illinois v. Perkins? The case in brief involved a murder investigation (Stephenson murder) in November 1984‚ located in East St. Louis‚ Illinois. The investigation went unsolved until 1986‚ when an inmate at the Graham Correctional Facility‚ told officials he had learn information related to the homicide from a fellow inmate‚ Lloyd Perkins. The inmate detailed certain information
Premium Police Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Juvenile Court Case Summary Student’s Name Institution Affiliation Juvenile Court Case Summary Roper Vs Simmons Case Roper (2005) is a United States Supreme court ruling related to capital punishment for juveniles under the age of 18. The case stands for the proposition that it is unconstitutional to sentence to death juveniles who are charged with murder before attaining the age of 18 (Roper‚ 2005). In this case‚ Christopher Simmons‚ a 17-year old boy‚ was convicted and sentenced to
Premium Crime Murder Capital punishment
If he were unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that this was his idea‚ he may end up in worse shape after the legal fees and time missed for court. He may be better off not pursuing legal action. As stated above‚ this was a difficult decision. How far do we take the idea that we are not to pursue legal action or compensation? What about cases such as being in a car accident? Should we not pursue compensation for damages? While I may not be able to answer this question myself‚ one thing
Premium Forgiveness Law Pleading
of Interpreters in the Court Systems Tonya Barrett CJA/394 March 30‚ 2015 Mike Magee The following paper will discuss the current language barriers and lack of interpreter availability in the court systems today. The court administrator is responsible for addressing this problem and improving the situation. Therefore‚ this paper will also cover the efforts that the court administrator has made to correct the issue at hand and whether the
Premium Law United States Judge
Court Decisions Sandra Shemick HSM 240 February 15‚ 2015 Erin Akins Court Decisions I chose Drug testing programs for welfare applicants. The reason I chose this is because I happen to agree with doing so. I disagree with the junction that the judge put in saying that it is “likely unconstitutional”. I feel this because I am a strong supporter in helping those who are in need‚ not those that are abusing the help. As a mother of two‚ and have been on state assistance for help‚ I often would see
Premium Drug addiction Michigan Bill Clinton