Statutory interpretation This process is used by judges in the courts when there is a dispute or being uncertain over the meaning of words or phrases in an Act of Parliament or piece of delegated legislation. The courts role is to find out how Parliament intended the law to apply and carry this out. The interpretation may form a precedent for future cases. Statutory interpretation can become a problem due to: The complexity of the English language a word may have several meaning‚ which can lead
Premium Law Statutory law United Kingdom
Coast. There is no date set forth in the e-mails for delivery. When the steel arrives‚ Little rejects shipment‚ claiming the steel was shipped too late. When West Coast sues Little for breach of contract‚ Little also raises the defense of the Statute of Frauds. Who wins‚ and why?
Premium Material Materials Raw material
------------------------------------------------- Language interpretation Language interpretation is the facilitating of oral or sign-language communication‚ either simultaneously or consecutively‚ between users of different languages. The process is described by both the words interpreting and interpretation. Translation studies deal with the systematic study of the theory‚ the description and the application of language interpretation and translation. In professional parlance‚ interpreting denotes
Premium Translation Sign language Language interpretation
The constitution as a written document is very simple and vague‚ making it fundamentally political and thus requiring those who interpret it to take into account the present state of the country and the effects that their decision will have on the current populous. The founding fathers‚ like our politicians today‚ had conflicting ideas on how the country should be run‚ hence the length and vagueness of the document. Among these debates was the issue of the judiciary branch. Many believed that a branch
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Separation of powers Judicial review
Rechtsgeleerdheid Anglo-American Contract and Tort law Interpretation of contracts ‘’ To what extend does the interpretation of Dutch contracts differ from English contracts. ’’ Naam: A.N.Y. van der Looij Studentnummer: 5610303 Begeleider: Professor H. Beale Amsterdam‚ 14th of June 2013 Table of contents Chapter 1 Preface 3 1.1 Neccessity of interpretation 3 1.2 ‘’Objective’’ and ‘’Subjective’’ interpretation 3 1.3 Unambiguous clauses 4 1.4 Priliminary
Premium Common law Contract Law
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT‚ GAUTENG (REPULIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) CASE NUMBER: 10/2012 In the Appeal between: HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT‚ FREE STATE APPELLANT And JOLENE PAKKIES Acting on behalf of Dineo Tau Zozo Tau Lulu Tau RESPONDENT ___________________________________________________________________________ HEADS OF ARGUMENT OF APPELLANT ___________________________________________________________________________ In an Appeal to the Constitutional Court the Appellant‚ the
Premium Childhood Constitution United States Constitution
Golden Rule Of Interpretation-Comparision Between English Law And Indian Law INTRODUCTION The golden rule is that the words of a statute must prima facie be given their ordinary meaning. It is yet another rule of construction that when the words of the statute are clear‚ plain and unambiguous‚ then the courts are bound to give effect to that meaning‚ irrespective of the consequences. It is said that the words themselves best declare the intention of the law-giver. In law‚ the
Premium
this case study they reference statute 42.09 (a)(3). This statute‚ of the Texas Penal Code prohibits the "desecration of a venerable object." 2. The Legislative Branch created statute 42.09(a)(3). 3. The passage above discusses the court case that involves the two following parties; Gregory Lee Johnson (defendant) and the State of Dallas Texas (Prosecutors). 4. The case was heard by the following three courts; first was Dall County Criminal Court‚ then the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and finally
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
The Constitution should be interpreted based on the current times and events. The interpretation of the Constitution in the past was unlawful in so many ways. There are still unratified amendments pending right now because they are unconstitutional. The method of interpretation might frame how political elites and the public at large view the court’s decision‚ as well as influence the court’s ability to avoid charges of judicial activism (Nardi‚ Jr.‚ 2014). There were a lot of Jim Crow laws that
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
aim of the court report is to get you out of the classroom and into the courtroom to see how the law works in practice! We would like you to visit a court to observe proceedings for a couple of hours and then write a report on your visit. Planning your court visit It is important to have an understanding of the court system before you embark on your visit. Therefore‚ please complete the required reading for Week 1 and 2 before visiting a court. Your best chance of seeing a court case from
Premium Court Judge Law