Court Visit Report Case CIV499511 - MANUEL E DELGADO JR VS SEQUOIA UNION SCHOOL DIST1 1. Judge V‚ Raymond Swope‚ clerk‚ court reporter‚ sheriff‚ defendant - SEQUOIA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT PRESENT WITH COUNSEL JOHN SHUPE‚ Plaintiff - MANUEL E DELGADO JR PRESENT WITH COUNSEL DAVID SECREST‚ MATTHEW ZITO‚ PRINCIPAL FOR MENLO ATHERTON HIGH‚ WITNESS KAREN ANN BRESLOW‚ WITNESS CLAUDIA KISPERSKY1 and 16 jurors were present in the court. 2. Sketch TBD 3. Plaintiff‚ Mr. Delgado lost employment
Premium Jury Criminal law
Critical Analysis of the Case of Salem Advocates Bar Association v. Union of India. (2005) 6 SCC 344 Facts of the Case The present case Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India[1] is basically an aftermath of the original case Salem Advocates Bar Association‚ Tamil Nadu. v. Union of India[2]. The Honorable Judges presiding over the case were Y.K. Sabharwal‚ D.M. Dharmadhikari and Tarun Chatterjee. The subject is basically related to Constitution and is a case of civil nature. In the former
Premium Dispute resolution Alternative dispute resolution Mediation
juvenile court and if the crime is more severe‚ an adult court may be more appropriate. The author will discuss the differences between adult and juvenile courts. Finally‚ it will discuss what can happen if juvenile courts are abolished and implications for young offenders. Compare and
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology
Q1. What is the dual-court system? Why do we have a dual court system? A. The dual-court system is the result of a general a agreement among the nation’s founders about the need for individual states to retain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy separate from federal control. The reason why we have a dual-court system is‚ back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free
Premium Criminal justice Crime Evidence law
Observation: For the last few weeks I made it my priority to attend as many court cases as I possibly could in order to fulfill the requirements for this paper. There were many challenges as there were at least five trials that I planned to observe that resulted in a continuance. Either a witness that was under subpoena failed to show‚ a party needed more time‚ the counsel’s health was affected and even when there wouldn’t be enough time during the trial court’s term to complete the trial. As
Premium Patient Medicine Hospital
Juvenile transfer is the process of removing juvenile offenders from the juvenile court and placing them into the adult court. Although states implement this process in varying ways‚ it is seen in different viewpoints as either having a positive effect on juveniles or a negative effect. Studies have been conducted examining the statistics regarding recidivism for juveniles who have been transferred to the adult court versus those who have not. After taking a look at these two perspectives‚ I have
Premium Crime Criminology Juvenile delinquency
Abstract The following is a case summary on United States Supreme Court case 03-633 Roper v. Simmons. Even though many disagree with the death penalty all together‚ even more disagree with the death penalty for juveniles. It is my opinion that anyone over the age of 16 who can premeditate and act upon an event so gruesome that includes either or both rape and murder should be subject to the death penalty. Juvenile offenses continue to rise in number and severity and many of those are because
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Roper v. Simmons United States
VICTORIA COURT Laureta‚ Ma. Theresa Cielo A. Gonzales‚ Bantican‚ Lagmay‚ Legaspi Domingo Galvez Munar CHAPTER 1______________________________________________INTRODUCTION Victoria Court Drive- in Hotel and Restaurant is a chain of full-service motels catering mostly to the upper income market segment. The traditional market for drive-in-hotels and motels are lovers who avail of one out of the many specially designed
Premium Marketing Rooms Marriage
different (or tied) product‚ or at least agrees that he will not purchase that product from any other supplier. In this case‚ Kodak was selling the photo film while conditioning the buyer to also buy the photofinishing product (because it was included in the price). Both decrees had supporting evidence of the high market power that Kodak had at the time‚ for which both cases were based. The conventional definition of market power is usually expressed as "the power to raise price." A company
Premium Supply and demand Marketing Elasticity
answer one that puzzled the Supreme Court and led to a change in criminal procedure. The verdict was a strict interpretation of the constitution. The fourth amendment was relevant because the fourteenth amendment grunted due process. It was a very good decision‚ it protected the black minority who at the time were being routinely harassed and convicted for no reasons. This decision certainly did not stop that but it made it harder
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution