My opinion of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) The government is charged with the responsibility of protecting its citizens. This responsibility is extended not only to administering punishment through enforcement of legislation but also to preventing occurrences through the enactment of laws to protect their citizens. The government had to act. The great fall that was the result of corporate and accounting fraud‚ in the early twenty-first century nearly destroyed the economical welfare of
Premium Internal control Audit Auditing
Chapter 5: the Sarbanes- Oxley act of 2002 involved the public anger that started when Enron‚ WorldCom‚ and other big companies scandals. This is when there was support for white collar crime when it came to accounting standards. Under the law of federal sentencing rules to make sure that white collar criminals are being punished. (Barnes‚ 2012). 1. For someone to alter or get rid of documents and there intensions to obstruct or effect the crime/case. 2. The CEO (chief executive officer) and the
Premium Corporate governance Enron Sarbanes–Oxley Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Introduction2001-2002 was marked by the Arthur Andersen accounting scandal and the collapse of Enron and WorldCom. Corporate reforms were demanded by the government‚ the investors and the American public to prevent similar future occurrences. Viewed to be largely a result of failed or poor governance‚ insufficient disclosure practices‚ and a lack of satisfactory internal controls‚ in 2002 George W. Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that became effective on
Premium Audit Internal control Enron
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 Edwina Wilson ACC 561 November 25‚ 2014 Dr. Carolyn Harold Sarbanes–Oxley Act was introduced into law July 30‚ 2002. It is named after the two sponsors‚ U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) and U.S. Representative Michael G. Oxley (R-OH). The main objective of the act is to protect investors by improving the accuracy‚ reliability and accountability of corporate disclosures. New aspects were created by Sarbanes-Oxley for corporate accountability as well as new penalties for wrong
Premium Corporation Enron Public company
Harrington 1 Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002: A Comprehensive Review By Hennessey T. Harrington For Business 102 Ethics & Public Policy Dr. Jasso TA Josh December 7‚ 2010 Harrington 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002: Spectrum of Objectives 1.1 On History 1.2 On Accountability 1.3 On Corporate Social Responsibility 2.0 Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002: A Historical Account 2.1 On Necessity 2.2 On Defective Oversight 2.3 On Corruption 2.4 On Conflict of Interest 2.5 On Imperfect
Premium Enron Business ethics Corporate governance
Analysis of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Abstract The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was enacted in July 30‚ 2002‚ by Congress to protect shareholders and the general public from fraudulent corporate practices and accounting errors and to maintain auditor independence. In protecting the shareholders and the general public the SOX Act is intended to improve the transparency of the financial reporting. Financial reports are to be certified by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
Premium Corporate governance Enron Internal control
This paper provides an in-depth evaluation of Sarbanes-Oxley Act‚ which is said to be promoted to produce change in the corporate environment‚ in general‚ by stressing issues of public accountability and disclosure in the financial operations of business. It explains how this is an Act that represents the government ’s and the Security and Exchange Commission ’s concern in promoting ethical standards in terms of financial disclosure in the corporate environment. This paper addresses the current
Premium Corporate governance Corporation Law
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Jayne Diaz BUS 591: Financial Accounting & Analysis Professor Susan Ayers March 26‚ 2012 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Prior to 2002‚ there was very little oversight of accounting procedures. Auditors were not always independent and corporate government procedures and disclosure provisions were inadequate. Sometimes‚ executive compensation was tied to the stock of the company which created an incentive to manipulate the stock price by using fraudulent
Premium Internal control Audit Public company
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Descriptions of the main aspects of the regulatory environment which will protect the public from fraud within corporations are going to be provided in this paper. A special attention to the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) requirement; along with an evaluation of whether Sarbanes-Oxley Act will be effective in avoiding future frauds based on their implemented rules and regulations. The main aspects of the regulatory environment are based on the different laws and regulations
Premium Management Health care Marketing
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act‚ also known as the "Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act.” This act was sponsored by U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes and U.S. Representative Michael G. Oxley in 2002 in reaction to several extremely high-profile corporate financial scandals‚ such as those involving Enron and WorldCom. These indignities ensued a decline of public trust in accounting and financial reporting practices. SOX applies to any company governed by the Securities and Exchange Commission
Premium Management Strategic management Marketing