My name is ………………………………and I am a very ambitious and career oriented person from the capital of Nepal. I left my home land 3 years ago to widen my horizons and explore the education system of one of the leading countries of the world. As they say‚ ’’Only as high as I reach can I grow‚ only as far as I seek can I go‚ only as deep as I look can I see‚ only as much as I dream can I be’’. The education system here is quite flexible and practical‚ which certainly suits my style of learning and I truly
Premium Education University Higher education
Implied Terms offer protection to contracting parties?” Case-Study assignment The simplest definition of the contract is a “legally binding agreement”[1]. However‚ we need to understand that not all agreements are contracts‚ only those that are legally enforceable. Terms of a contract specify the promises‚ obligations and penalties that both parties agree to while formulating that contract. We distinguish between two specific types of these terms: express and implied. Express terms are those
Premium Contract Contractual term
he should not perform more than 4 nights per week. The band dismissed him. He brought a claim for wrongful dismissal. Held of the case is the claimant’s action was unsuccessful as his medical condition made it impossible for him to perform his contractual obligations and the contract was thus frustrated. Sec 66 of CA a person who had received benefits under a void contract must recovered it to other party in the contract. To
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract
Lucy v. Zehmer Case Brief Facts: Lucy made an offer to Zehmer one night while at his restaurant to purchase Zehmer’s farm for $50‚000. Zehmer and Lucy both signed an agreement that promised Zehmer would sell the farm to Lucy. Zehmer claimed later that the agreement to sell the farm was made when they were both drinking at Zehmer’s restaurant and that he only meant the acceptance as a joke. Zehmer didn’t believe that Lucy’s offer was genuine since they were both drinking and went along with
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Appeal
Express authority was not given to Mr. Freeman as stated in exhibit C‚ as Mr. Harran did not specify in very specific or detailed language (pg. 935) that Mr. Freeman had the authority to make new orders in his absence. However‚ there was implied authority. According to the evidence‚ Mr. Harran did leave Mr. Freeman in charge and instructed him to use his common sense in case something were to come up. There’s also the issue of apparent authority that is clearly present here. In Busher and Willis
Premium Contract Law Contract law
the marriage. On October 1‚ 2014‚ a settlement was reached at the parties; informal Settlement Meeting (see Exhibit 1 & 2). Following the Settlement Meeting‚ Petitioner’s attorney prepared a proposed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to incorporate the terms of the agreement reached on October 1‚ 2014. . II. LAW AND ARGUMENT A. A CODE OF
Premium Contract Law Contract law
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) published the 8th and current version of its International Commercial Terms‚ also known as INCOTERMS® on January 1‚ 2011. The revised rules‚ originally designated "INCOTERMS 2010"‚ contain a series of changes‚ such as a reduction in the number of terms to 11 from 13. The DAF‚ DES‚ DEQ‚ and DDU designations have been eliminated‚ while two new terms‚ Delivered at Terminal (DAT) and Delivered at Place (DAP)‚ have been added. INCOTERMS 2010 also attempt to better
Premium International trade Commercial item transport and distribution Cargo
a dispute between Israel and Egypt. The dispute occurred when Egypt terminated its gas deal with Israel. The head of the Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company has said it has terminated its contract to ship gas to Israel because of violations of contractual obligations‚ a decision Israel said overshadowed the peace agreement between the two countries. Al Jazeera and agencies said‚ that Israel relies on Egyptian natural gas for 40 per cent of its supplies to produce electricity‚ the chairman of a government
Premium Contract Ramesses II Contractual term
Introduction There are two urgent issues for us to figure out when dealing with two questions: firstly‚ whether Ron’s exclusion clause on the receipt or the sign is effective based on the fact that Winston does not know that existence of exclusion clause. Secondly‚ whether Winston accepts Ron’s exclusion clause at the right time and whether it can exclude Ron for liability. (a) Whether Winston is bound by the words on the receipt or the sign? As we can see in the case introduction‚ Ron
Premium Contract Sale of Goods Act 1979 Contractual term
designated to benefit from an appointment‚ disposition‚ or assignment (as in a will‚ insurance policy‚ etc.)‚ or to receive something as a result of a legal arrangement or instrument. The aforementioned terms are commonly understood by attorneys‚ legal scholars‚ and laypersons alike. These terms serve as the fundamental base for any trust agreement‚ providing the instrument‚ and two of the three key actors within the trust (trustee being the third). On their faces‚
Premium Law Contract Common law