STUDY QUESTIONS for Final Exam Phil 2925 December 2013 Short answer questions 1. Cover distinguishes between a static and dynamic view of law: how does this help a judge who accepts Cover’s view avoid some conflicts between law and morality? 2. In what ways is Starry Vere like Lemuel Shaw/ 3. What are the three values of free expression cited by the Canadian Supreme Court? 4. When is sexual representation obscene‚ according to Canadian law? 5. What are sections 1‚ 15‚ and 27 of
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Sexual harassment First Amendment to the United States Constitution
GUIDE COMMERCIAL LAW IA COMLAW 270/ 30411 COMMERCIAL LAW IA COMLAW 270/ 30411 COPYRIGHT: CACC COMMERCIAL LAW SYLLABUS This course consists of 9 study units SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES Study Unit 1 Introduction to the course‚ the
Premium Law Common law
Contract = an agreement between two or more persons which will be enforced by a court of law *Action for breach of contract is part of common (judge-made) law *Essence of contract law is to protect the bargain bw 2 parties *Must not engage in conduct that is misleading‚ unconscionable and unfair. 1. Formal contracts Contracts of record (court records) Contracts under seal (ie deeds‚ gratuitous comments) 2. Simple contracts In writing Evidenced in writing No requirements SIMPLE ROADMAP Intention
Premium Contract
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1. S. 124 - Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar v Moreshwar Madan Mantri (Indemnity) (Plaintiff‚ at the request of the defendant‚ executed two mortgages in favour of Mohandas. Defendant wrote a letter promising to indemnify the plaintiff against any suits by the mortgagee‚ along with executing a third mortgage in place of the previous two. Plaintiff prays that the defendant obtains a release of liability from Mohandas; Issues: 1) Can the indemnified ask for performance of the contract
Premium Contract Legal terms Contractual term
Commercial Law Term Paper (Case Analysis) Pro-Gordon C. Johnson June 18‚ 2013 9th Edition Chapter 5-Case 5 Summary: Marie-Claude operated a bowling alley in a commercial area that was adjacent to a residential area. Many small children used the parking lot near the bowling alley as a playground‚ and Marie-Claude was constantly tell these children leave the parking area maybe they will get injured. However‚ one six years old boy climb onto the flat roof of
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Interest
BUSINESS LAW FINAL EXAM This is a take-home exam. The exam is to be handed out on July 26‚ 2012 and returned on July 31‚ 2012 on the final exam time. The group leader will assign each group member a question and each group member will answer the question and return the answer to the group leader. The group leader will grade each member in terms of cooperation and totality of the answer. The group leader will submit a final draft on exam date (July 31‚ 2012). The final draft must be done in
Premium Contract Property Computer software
Discussion Question 1. On 1 Jan 2009 a V and P entered a standard form contract for sale of property in SYD‚ with special condition that the “sale is subject to P completing the sale of his existing home in Brisbane by 1 June 2009” but no time for completion is specified and clause 29 of 2005 Standard Form is deleted. (Standard Form: completed with in 42 days of existing contract/ exchange of contract? Hence the qtn scenario means it’ll be deleted.) Is there a binding contract for SYD before
Premium Contract Contract law
Number: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Faculty of Law Academic year 2007-2008 THE LAW OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION Prof. Dr. Geert Van Calster and Prof. Dr. Jan Wouters EXAM 24 January 2008 READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFOREHAND ! ! ! 1. This exam lasts maximum 3 hours. 2. This is an open-book exam which consists of 3 main questions (with subquestions). You may use any written‚ type-written or printed materials. 3. This exam contains 14 pages + 5 pages of attachments. Please indicate
Premium International trade World Trade Organization
LGEAL PERSONALITY Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company‚ the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle"‚ and the several important exceptions that have been developed are often described as "exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle". Amongst these is the ’derivative action’‚ which allows a minority shareholder to bring a claim on behalf
Premium
According to the Australian Constitution‚ the power to make laws vested in the parliament ‚ whilst the power to interpret laws and to judge whether they apply in individual cases‚ vested in the High Court and other federal courts. In fact‚ one of the major function of the high court is to interpret the Constitution. For instance‚ the High Court of Australia may rule a law to be unconstitutional‚ that is beyond the power of parliament to make‚ and therefore of no effect. Such a circumstance would
Premium Separation of powers Law Constitution