Case Summary In 2000‚ under the leadership of the former CEO Steve Reinemund‚ PepsiCo.launched a new business strategy that based on the racial and culture diversity. It emphasized the importance of having equal working and promoting opportunities for all employees from different ethnic groups. In order to help the company keep up with the demographical shifting in United States‚ this strategy was initially resisted by some of the employees as well as senior division managers. The resistance
Premium Management Leadership
Case Study – Coke in India Adapted by Lesley Fleischman from: Hills‚ Jonathan and Welford‚ Richard. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 12‚ 168–177 (2005) August 2003 • • • • • October 2003 • • Coke has 44 wholly owned and franchise owned bottling plants in India Indian NGO finds that Coke and Pepsi products bottled in India contain pesticides. Immediate impact on Coke stock price. Coke threatened legal action over allegations. Indian government
Premium Water Coca-Cola India
Case Study: Coke Zero I highly agree with the statement that “companies should develop products what will bring new customers into market rather than just creating variants on the old” (Lamb et al. 289) because when old products failed‚ it is an opportunity for the company to invest in different market segments— “a subgroup of people or organizations sharing one or more characteristics that cause them to have similar product needs” (Lamb et al. 261)—that could potentially increase additional consumers
Premium Marketing Diet Coke Coca-Cola
Introducing New Coke Q. In your opinion‚ what was the most significant challenge (or problem) that Coca Cola faced with the Pepsi Challenge? Ans. The most significant challenge faced by Coca Cola was in the late 1970s when the top executives of the Coca Cola actually paid less and less attention to the marketing and sales of their central product and they were making attempt on diversifications‚ and the competitor Pepsi during this period targeted the young generation by
Premium Coca-Cola Cola Pepsi
COCA-COLA Ryan Hodownes Southern New Hampshire University Dr. Greg Randolph ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to examine the company Coca-Cola‚ which is an Atlanta based beverage company‚ from an economic point of view. The beverage industry as a whole will be examined. Many things will be taken into consideration such as entry barriers for the firm‚ competitors and their goods‚ as well as the structure of the overall industry. Coca-Cola will be examined specifically by looking at the
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink
Evaluation‚ Monitoring and Control 24 Monitoring and Controlling 26 Sales Analysis 27 Market Share Evaluation 27 Marketing Profitability Analysis 27 Market Research 27 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Giant soft drink company Coca-Cola has come under intense scrutiny by the investors due to its inability to effectively carry out its marketing program. Consequently it is seeking the help of new Marketing Company to develop a professional marketing plan which will help the business
Premium Marketing Coca-Cola
- PAGE 4-6 CHAPTER 2 INDUSTRY PROFILE - PAGE 7-11 CHAPTER 3 COMPANY PROFILE - PAGE 12-63 COCA-COLA COMPANY - PAGE 13-17 GLOBAL MARKET SHARE OF COCA-COLA - PAGE 17-18 TRENDS AND FORCES - PAGE 19-22 POTER’S FIVE FORCES - PAGE 22-29 PESTLE ANALYSIS - PAGE 29-33 SWOT ANALYSIS - PAGE 33-40 COCA-COLA INDIA - PAGE 41-42 PRODUCTS IN INDIA - PAGE 42-46 MARKETING MIX - PAGE 49-58 PESTLE ANALYSIS
Premium Coca-Cola
1. a. Diet Coke – Designed for Consumer who are health conscious. b. Coke Zero – Designed for young men between the ages of 18 & 34. c. Diet Coke Plus – Designed for consumers who are more health conscious who desire a sweeter taste with more vitamins & minerals. d. Coca- Cola Blak – Designed for older more sophisticated customers willing to pay more. e. Full Throttle Blue Demon – Designed to appeal Hispanic Men. Each products marketing should contain the following types of demographic
Premium
the company: (Rough Draft) Weakness: 1. Coke did lese to merge its product with local cultures by adapting packaging‚ serving size and flavors. So it was putting distance between itself and its country of origin. 2. Coke failed to develop good products for teen market to match Pepsi’s Mountain dew and good products for “new agers” to match SoBe South Beach Beverage‚ the owners of SoBe decided to sell to Pepsi‚ not Coke‚ because they saw Coke as uncreative. 3. Obesity and other health
Premium Coca-Cola Diet Coke
of New Coke Wright State University MKT 3500 - 01 Marketing Research By Nicole Fore Taylor Gilliam Ashley Hatton John Petry Abstract During the 1980’s Coca-Cola was faced with a potentially company killing problem. They were losing market share quickly to their competitors. Pepsi was stealing a portion of the younger generation with their advertising campaign‚ and they proved that consumers liked Pepsi better with the “Pepsi Challenge.” To combat their falling market share Coke decided
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola