Case 1-3 Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India 1. As far as I am concerned‚ there are three specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles: 1) As mentioned in the case‚ Indian government viewed as unfriendly to foreign investors. Outside investment had been allowed only in high-tech sectors and was almost entirely prohibited in consumer goods sectors. 2) Based on Indian laws‚ outside investment cannot use their original brand name. For Coca-Cola‚ they attempted
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Marketing
Coke and Pepsi Learn To Compete in India 1. The political environment in India has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola India. What specific aspects of the political environment have played key role? Could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? If not‚ could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? Answer The political environment have played key role as follow: - Indian government viewed
Premium Coca-Cola Carbonation India
Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India CASE STUDY 2 International Marketing 1. The political environment in India has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coca- Cola India. What specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? Could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? If not‚ could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? There are several specific aspects of the political environment
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
COKE AND PEPSI LEARN TO COMPETE IN INDIA Brief Overview: * The case of Coke and Pepsi in India is a lesson that all marketers can observe‚ analyze and learn from‚ since it involves so many marketing aspects that are essential for all marketers to take into consideration * Pepsi entered into the Indian beverage market in July 1986 as a joint venture with two local partners‚ Voltas and Punjab Agro‚ forming “Pepsi Foods Ltd.” While Coca-Cola followed suit in 1990 with a joint venture
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola
1. The political environment in India has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coca-cola India. What specific aspects of the political environment played key roles? Could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? If not‚ could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? 2. Timing of entry into Indian market brought different results for PepsiCo and Coca-Cola India. What benefits or disadvantages as a result of earlier
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Carbonation
Case Study: Coke & Pepsi learn to compete in India Timing of entry into the Indian market brought different results for PepsiCo and Coca-Cola India. What benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? Coca-Cola (1990) Benefits: advantages as „Early-Follower“‚ possibility to use reliable market information that´s already existing take-over of standards position as international market leader Disadvantages: expert knowledge of competitors has to be overtaken
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Marketing
www.ajbms.org ISSN: 2047-2528 Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences Vol. 2 No. 10 [38-50] Analysis of Customer Satisfaction with the Islamic Banking Sector: Case of Brunei Darussalam Mohamed Sharif Bashir Imam Centre for Banking and Finance Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University Riyadh 11432‚ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia E-mail: mbelsharif@imamu.edu.sa. ABSTRACT During the last decade‚ the Islamic banking sector in Brunei Darussalam experienced remarkable and increasingly
Premium Bank Islamic banking
The case of Coke and Pepsi in India is a lesson that all marketers can observe‚ analyze and learn from‚ since it involves so many marketing aspects that are essential for all marketers to take into consideration. Both companies had many difficulties‚ especially Coca-Cola‚ and it’s useful to observe how it dealt with the different aspects‚ stating from the political environment of the Indian market and the trade barriers it faced‚ going through the market entry and penetration strategies considered
Premium
Coke Strengths: 1. In 1993 Coke held a 59% share of the fountain market—using it to promote the brand further. 2. Coke earned a high percentage of its profits in the international market. They established themselves with the help of “ ‘anchor bottlers’—large‚ committed‚ and experienced bottling outfits like Norway’s Ringnes and Australia’s Amatil” 3. During WWII Coke was able to establish itself in the European and Asian markets with the help of the government because it was being
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
performance of both Coke and Pepsi in India. At the time when Pepsi was entering the Indian market‚ India was generally seen as a very unfriendly place for foreigners to do business. In addition‚ in 1991 India experienced a severe economic crisis that was triggered by the rise in imported oil prices following the first Gulf War. This was around the time Pepsi was already in the market in India‚ and had already got a decent foothold in the market before Coke. Due to the strict regulations India had on foreign
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola Economics