DAVID B YOFFIE RENEE KIM Cola Wars Contiinue: Coke C an nd Pepsi in 20110 oke and Pepsi vied for “t hroat share” o of the world’ss beverage m market. For more than a century‚ Co The most intense battles in the so-called colla wars weree fought over the $74 billio on carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry in the Un nited States.1 In a “carefu ully waged co ompetitive strruggle” that llasted from 1975 through the mid-199 90s‚ both Cok ke and Pepsi achieved average annual rrevenue grow wth of 2 w CS
Premium Coca-Cola
concentrate industry) so profitable? The soft drink industry survives on the rivalry that has existed for over a century between Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola. The two brands are competing for the market share nationally and globally by trying to clinch the thirst of every person in the world. In Michael Porter’s five forces‚ the threat of rivalry pushes both companies to “out compete” with each other and drive up the fixed cost to enter the market. By driving up the fixed costs for other new entrants‚
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola
income levels‚ penetration‚ etc .The success of any brand in the Indian rural market is very unpredictable. It has always been very difficult to judge the rural market. Many brands have failed miserably for reasons unknown .More often than not‚ people attribute rural market success to luck. Therefore‚ marketers have to understand the dynamics and attitudes within each and every village ATTRACTIVENESS OF RURAL MARKET -LARGE POPULATION SIZE -RAISING PROSPERITY OF THE RURAL HOUSEHOLDS -GROWTH IN CONSUMPTION IN RURAL INDIA
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Pepsi
CONTENTS Chapter No. Chapter No-1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Need for the Study 1.3 Objective of the Study 1.4 Methodology 1.5 Limitations Chapter No-2 PEPSI COMPANY OVERVIEW 2.1 Genesis and Growth 2.2 Organization Structure 2.3 Production Function 2.4 HR Function 2.5 Finance Function 2.6 Marketing Function 2.7 Future Function Chapter No-3 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Details of the survey conducted 71 Chapter No-4 SUMMARY AND SUGGESTIONS 4.1 Summary 4.2 Findings
Premium Pepsi
Case 1-3 Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India 1. As far as I am concerned‚ there are three specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles: 1) As mentioned in the case‚ Indian government viewed as unfriendly to foreign investors. Outside investment had been allowed only in high-tech sectors and was almost entirely prohibited in consumer goods sectors. 2) Based on Indian laws‚ outside investment cannot use their original brand name. For Coca-Cola‚ they attempted
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Marketing
Internal Analysis of Coke and Pepsi (Appendix A) In this session‚ we would analyze Coke and Pepsi internally using SWOT analysis. SWOT is the short form of Strengths‚ Weaknesses‚ Opportunities and Threats. In Appendix A‚ we can see that the major strength for Coke is its name value. Coke is the World’s leading brand for CSD. Marketing and advertising is the major battleground for the CSD industry‚ from the SWOT analysis‚ we can see Coke did a great job for that. Being the market leader is definitely
Premium Coca-Cola Caffeine
09 Pepsi & Coke 08 Fall In May‚ 1886‚ Coca Cola was introduced by John Pemberton a pharmacist from Atlanta‚ Georgia. John Pemberton started brewing his coca cola formula in a three legged brass kettle in his backyard. Pharmacists Caleb Bradham in New Bern‚ North Carolina first made competitor Pepsi in the 1890’s. The brand was trademarked on June 16‚ 1903. These companies have brand identification and customer loyalties that have made them a historical landmark. Today Pepsi and Coke control
Premium Coca-Cola Marketing Soft drink
when doing business in developing countries. Although Coke and Pepsi were prompt at addressing the accusations brought against them‚ they overlooked multiple issues when starting business in India. When starting a business in a foreign country‚ the first priority a company should have is to learn the native culture. This was Coke and Pepsi’s biggest mistake and was most likely the reason why the Indian population responded so hostilely. Coke and Pepsi’s problems in India were complicated by the
Premium Water Water resources Freshwater
Have you ever wondered if the sugar content in Coke and Pepsi has altered you or your friends preference? In this experiment‚ we tested to see if the sugar content changes peoples preference over Coke and Pepsi. We chose this experiment because we would like to see how people change their opinions of their favorite soda‚ after we have informed them of the sugar content. This experiment of Coke vs Pepsi is tied into chemistry by the percentage of the compound/sugar in each can of soda. Background
Premium Coca-Cola Diet Coke Thums Up
COKE AND PEPSI LEARN TO COMPETE IN INDIA Brief Overview: * The case of Coke and Pepsi in India is a lesson that all marketers can observe‚ analyze and learn from‚ since it involves so many marketing aspects that are essential for all marketers to take into consideration * Pepsi entered into the Indian beverage market in July 1986 as a joint venture with two local partners‚ Voltas and Punjab Agro‚ forming “Pepsi Foods Ltd.” While Coca-Cola followed suit in 1990 with a joint venture
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola