Week 4 Courtroom Presentation Paper Trina Smith CJA/224 June 6‚ 2011 David Mc Killop Week 4 Courtroom Presentation Paper Everyone has been in or seen a courtroom. If not personally‚ they have definitely seen one on television. Shows like Law & Order and the First 48 gives the generalization of how a criminal is caught‚ brought to justice and it’s done all within one hour. Then there are civil court shows like Judge Judy and Judge Mathis‚ where you can see what actually happens in a court
Free Jury Judge Law
Division DEBORAH WHITE‚ ) ) Plaintiff‚ ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285 ) PATRICK GIBBS; and STAND ) ALONE PROPERTIES‚ L.L.C.‚ ) d/b/a O’MALLEY’S TAVERN‚ ) ) Defendants. ) Courtroom Observation Review of the 2008 2L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law INTRODUCTION This case between the plaintiff‚ Deborah White (Appellee) and the defendants‚ Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties‚ L.L.C.‚ d/b/a
Premium Alcoholic beverage
I contacted the other interviewing detectives and agents. They informed me that Justin‚ Zachary and Leif also denied viewing‚ possessing or sharing child pornography. I directed Agent Sutehall and Agent Ensley to interview Paul Giering at his workplace. I stayed to manage and help with the search and evidence collection. 7. Search the residence to locate evidence of the crime. Residence Search Prior to the commencement of the search‚ I directed Detective Kissinger to take photographs of the
Premium Police United States Constitution Crime
Courtroom Workgroup CJA/204 Courtroom Workgroup In The United States criminal justice system‚ a Courtroom Workgroup is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor‚ criminal defense attorney‚ and the judicial officer. This foundational concept in the academic discipline of criminal justice‚ recharacterizes the seemingly adversarial courtroom participants as collaborators in "doing justice." The courtroom workgroup was proposed by Eisenstein and Jacob in 1977 to explain
Premium Criminal law Criminal justice Jury
officeris called a courtroom work group. The courtroom workgroup was proposed by Eisenstein and Jacob in 1977 to explain their observations of the ways courts‚ especially lower level courts‚ actually come to decisions. This foundational concept in the academic discipline of criminal justice identifies the seemingly opposing courtroom participants as collaborators in "doing justice." Efficient courtroom workgroups seek to process cases rather than dispense justice. Because the courtroom workgroup deviates
Premium Law Judge Jury
Courtroom Standards Analysis University of Phoenix Abstract The United State’s Criminal Justice system allows people to be put to a fair trial within a court of law. This means that everyone has the right to be tried for the crimes that he or she is being charged with and has the right to an unbiased trial. Though everyone has this right‚ many people do not know how the trial process works‚ or do not know what the courtroom personnel do. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the major personnel
Premium Law Judge Jury
University of Phoenix | Courtroom Participant Matrix January 20‚ 2013 CJA/491 Survey of Criminal Court System Leesa McNeil | | Apollo Group[Pick the date] | University of Phoenix Material Courtroom Participant Matrix Complete the matrix below using your text and other resources. Title | Role | Responsibilities | Ethical Duties | Selection Method | Judge | Is to see that both sides follow the laws
Free Criminal law Jury Law
Criminal Courts Yenisey Gonzalez CJA/ 204 University of Phoenix Professor John DiPietro February 6‚ 2013 In the following essay will talk about the participants in a courtroom. How do they work on a daily basis and what changes would I recommend. Also what is the role of the prosecutor? How does a prosecutor determine which cases to pursue? Also what are some solutions to backlog of cases? According to Schmallager (2011)‚ criminal trial participants are dividing in two categories that
Premium Criminal law Prosecutor Jury
Courtroom Participation Chart LTB CJA/224 January 22‚ 2013 University of Phoenix Material Courtroom Participant Chart Complete the following chart. | |What are the individual’s responsibilities in the |Why is it important for these responsibilities to be | | |courtroom process? |fulfilled adequately? (Consider the effect of | | |
Premium Management Strategic management Law
witness a functional courtroom workgroup. In a perfect world‚ the process would run as smoothly as depicted on television. In this paper‚ we will examine the courtroom work group and the roles each person plays in carrying out justice. Courtroom Structure A courtroom work group is made up of a judge‚ bailiffs‚ prosecution‚ defense counsel‚ court clerks‚ court reporters‚ and expert witnesses. In other words‚ they are “professional” courtroom personnel. Also present in a courtroom for a trial are
Free Jury Judge Jury trial