Salazar‚ Kristine Kim B. 4-DLM 1. Arturo Tolentino vs Secretary of Finance FACTS: Tolentino et al is questioning the constitutionality of RA 7716 otherwise known as the Expanded Value Added Tax (EVAT) Law. Tolentino averred that this revenue bill did not exclusively originate from the House of Representatives as required by Section 24‚ Article 6 of the Constitution. Even though RA 7716 originated as HB 11197 and that it passed the 3 readings in the HoR‚ the same did not complete the 3 readings
Premium Tax Value added tax Indirect tax
Palmas Case (US v. Netherlands) Permanent Court of Arbitration (1928) 2 U.N. Rep. Int’l Arbitral Awards 829 Facts The Island of Palmas is about halfway between the Philippines (formerly under Spanish control) and the Nanusa Island group (formerly of the Dutch East Indies class). In the Treaty of Paris (1898)‚ the island lied within the boundaries of the Philippines ceded by Spain to the US. Arguments US: As the successor of Spain‚ who was the first to discover the island‚ the US has
Premium Netherlands Spanish language Dutch Empire
ASUNZA‚ Charles Darvin S. 4LM RESTATE THE FOLLOWING: 1. ARTICLE 279 No less than the Constitution recognizes and guarantees the labor’s right to security of tenure. Under the Labor Code of the Philippines‚ as amended‚ specifically‚ Article 279 of the said Code‚ the security of tenure has been construed to mean as that “the employer shall not terminate the services of an employee except for a just cause or when authorized” by the Code. The two facets of this legal provision are: (a) the
Premium Employment
manila is conjugal property of the parties and that the petitioner ordered to render an accounting of that business and that the private respondent be declared with a rights to manage the conjugal property. Petitioner moved to dismiss the case on the ground that the case of the action is barred of the judgment in the divorce proceeding in the Nevada court where the respondent had acknowledged that he and petitioner had no “common property” as June 11‚ 1982. Issue: Whether there is an effect of the
Premium Marriage Family law Law
2007 Facts: On February 3‚ 2006 petitioner‚ the duly elected Mayor of San Francisco‚ Agusan Del Sur‚ filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the invalidation of the approval of the temporary appointment of Daligdig with the CSC-CARAGA‚ where the case contains the following relevant portions: a) On July 5‚ 2005 Mayor Lademora appointed‚ Gil A. Daligdig as Municipal Government Department Head I‚ under temporary status‚ of the Municipality of San Francisco‚ Agusan Del Sur. On the following
Premium Municipality Mexico City Local government
Cyruz P. Tuppal 2011-0134 Case Title: STARLITE VS NLRC G.R. No.: G.R. No. 78491 Date: March 16‚ 1989 Petitioner: Starlite Plastic Industrial Corporation Respondent: National Labor Relations Commission and Edgar Gomez Ponente: J. Cortes Facts: Private respondent GOMEZ was employed as a factory worker by STARLITE sometime in March 1981. On 22 June 1984‚ STARLITE dismissed him on the ground that he was caught attempting to steal one ballast costing P80.00. STARLITE reported
Premium Employment 1984 Prima facie
(1) G.R. No. 169144 IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION TO APPROVE THE WILL OF RUPERTA PALAGANAS WITH PRAYER FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR‚ MANUEL MIGUEL PALAGANAS and BENJAMIN GREGORIO PALAGANAS‚ petitioners‚ vs. ERNESTO PALAGANAS‚ respondent. January 26‚ 2011 ABAD‚ J.: FACTS: Ruperta C. Palaganas (Ruperta)‚ a Filipino who became a naturalized United States (U.S.) citizen in 2001‚ died single and childless. In the last will and testament she executed in California‚ she designated
Premium Estate Inheritance Legal terms
♥ ILOVEYOU ♥ Oria Vs McMicking Source: www.lawphil.net Art. 1387. All contracts by virtue of which the debtor alienates property by gratuitous title are presumed to have been entered into in fraud of creditors‚ when the donor did not reserve sufficient property to pay all debts contracted before the donation. FACTS Gutierrez Hermanos filed an action for recovery of a sum of money against Oria Hermanos & Co. and herein plaintiff filed an action for recovery also for the same defendant
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Plaintiff
G.R. No. L-42091 November 2‚ 1935 GONZALO CHUA GUAN‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ vs. SAMAHANG MAGSASAKA‚ INC.‚ and SIMPLICIO OCAMPO‚ ADRIANO G. SOTTO‚ and EMILIO VERGARA‚ as president‚ secretary and treasurer respectively of the same‚ defendants-appellees. Facts: 1. Gonzalo Toco‚ the owner of the 5‚894 shares of capital stock mortgaged these shares to Chua Chiu to guarantee the payment of debt of 20‚000. -These shares were represented by 9 certificates; having a par value of P5 per share
Premium Mortgage Debt Stock
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC G.R. No. L-12342 August 3‚ 1918 A.A. ADDISON‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ Vs. MARCIANA FELIX and BALBINO TIOCO‚ defendants-appellees. FACTS: By a public instrument dated June 11‚ 1914 plaintiff Addison sold to the defendant Marciana Felix and husband Balbino Tioco‚ 4 parcels of land. Defendants paid‚ at the time of the execution of the deed‚ the sum of P3‚000.00 on account of the purchase price‚ and bound herself to pay the remainder in installments
Premium Legal terms Property law Contract