IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 81-1505 Transamerica Oil Corporation‚ Plaintiff-Appellee‚ v. Lynes‚ Inc. and Baker International Corporation‚ Defendants-Appellants. 723F.2d 758; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14288; 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1076 ------------------------------------------------- December 21‚ 1983 PROCEDURAL POSTURE Plaintiff brought suit under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to recover damages resulting from the breach of an
Premium Warranty Appeal Jury
Case Brief: TRANSAMERICA OIL CORPORATION v. LYNES‚ INC and Baker Internat’l Corporation Procedural history The plaintiff purchaser (Transamerica Oil Corporation) brought action to recover damages resulting from defendant sellers’ (Lynes‚ Inc) breach of an express warranty under Kansas Uniform Commercial Code. The U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas awarded damages to the purchaser. The sellers appealed. Facts Harold Brown‚ president of Transameria‚ saw defendants’ advertisement
Premium Contract Appeal Law
Case Study-Transamerica Oil Corporation v. Lynes Incorporated I. Procedural History Transamerica Oil Corporation‚ who conducts oil and gas drilling‚ solicited Lynes Incorporated about their advertisement regarding an injection packer and decided to purchase several of them only to determine that they did not function as advertised. Plaintiff decided to file suit‚ under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)‚ the plaintiff’s claim that there was a breach of an express warranty by the defendant
Premium Appeal Jury Court
ACW Case study #1 Transamerica Oil Corporation v. Lynes‚ 723 F.2d 758. Procedural History: Transamerica‚ who conducts oil and gas drilling‚ solicited Lynes about their advertisement regarding an injection packer and decided purchased several of them only later to determine that they did not perform properly. Plaintiff decided to file suit‚ under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)‚ the plaintiff claim that there was a breach of an express warranty by the
Premium Law Warranty Appeal
Transamerica By 500374724 Submitted To Prof. Graeme Metcalf November 7‚ 2012 Ryerson University What is a transsexual? A transsexual is someone who is born with the characteristics of one sex but feels they belong to the opposite sex. Sex is different than gender. Sex is the physical form while gender is the mental form. Transsexuality happens when one is born in the opposite sex of their alleged gender. They’ve found their gender
Free Transgender Gender
Gulf Oil Corp.--Takeover Summary of Facts o George Keller of the Standard Oil Company of California (Socal) is trying to determine how much he wants to bid on Gulf Oil Corporation. Gulf will not consider bids below $70 per share even though their last closing price per share was valued at $43. o Between 1978 and 1982‚ Gulf doubled its exploration and development expenses to increase their oil reserves. In 1983‚ Gulf began reducing exploration expenditures considerably due to declining oil prices
Premium Stock Stock market Cash flow
1. Case Name‚ Citation‚ and Court Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall LEXIS 2826I (2008) The District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2. Key Facts A. Internet Solutions Corp. (ISC)‚ which operates employment recruiting and Internet advertising websites‚ has its principal place of business in Florida. B. Tabatha Marshall‚ a resident of the State of Washington‚ was sued by ISC for making false and defamatory statements on her website. C. Marshall filed a motion to dismiss asserting
Premium Appeal Civil procedure Jurisdiction
Case 1: McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green‚ the Supreme Court holds that a charging party can prove unlawful discrimination indirectly by showing‚ for example‚ in a hiring case that: (1) the charging party is a member of a Title VII protected group; (2) he or she applied and was qualified for the position sought; (3) the job was not offered to him or her; and (4) the employer continued to seek applicants with similar qualifications. If the plaintiff can prove these four elements‚ the employer must
Premium Law United States Discrimination
In 1968‚ Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television‚ Inc.‚ 392 U. S. 390‚ the Court determined that a CATV provider was more like a viewer than a broadcaster‚ because its system “no more than enhances the viewer’s capacity to receive the broadcaster’s sig¬nals by providing a well-located antenna with an efficient connec¬tion to the viewer’s television set.” Therefore‚ the Supreme Court held that a CATV provider does not violate the exclusive right of the copyright holder and hence did not perform
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States
5.2.1 Standing In law‚ standing is the term for the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party’s participation in the case. When it comes to the right of standing in cases related to patented technology‚ it becomes more complicated than just being able to prove that the infringement harms the party‚ he should also have all the rights of the patented technology to be eligible to sue. Let us suppose a researcher
Premium Law Patent Common law