MK416-Case Study 1 1) Both companies experienced a range of unexpected problems and difficulties while trying to enter the Indian market. The Indian government was viewed as unfriendly to foreign investors. Also‚ the “principle of indigenous availability” had specified that if an item could be obtained anywhere else within the country‚ imports of similar items were forbidden. In Coca-Cola’s first attempt in the Indian market they chose to voluntarily withdrawal following a dispute with the government
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Bottle
PEPSI BLUE CASE STUDY: THE CHALLENGES INHERENT IN EXECUTING A GLOBAL RE-BRANDING CAMPAIGN During the 1990s‚ PepsiCo launched new products and engineered a global re-branding campaign in an effort to grow sales volume; reinvigorate their stagnant brand; and to close the increasingly large sales and market share gap between itself and its primary competitor‚ Coca-Cola. In 1993‚ Pepsi jump-started its marketing efforts by adding two brands to its portfolio: Crystal Pepsi and Pepsi Max. Crystal
Premium Marketing Brand Advertising
Case Study 16: Coke and Pepsi 1. Identify the ongoing issues in this case with respect to issues management‚ crisis management‚ global business ethics‚ and stakeholder management. Rank order these in terms of their priorities for Coca-Cola and for PepsiCo. Number 1 Priority: The major global business ethics I found in this case study was the whole issue with excessive water usage in their companies as well as the pollution of the water. The book explains that water is very sacred in India. Even
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
PepsiCo Inc. was created in 1965 as a result of the merger of Pepsi Cola‚ created in 1898 and Frito Lay‚ created in 1932. Both companies agreed that by merging they would gain access to a wider market. Diversification was part of the company’s strategy from the beginning‚ and we can say that because Frito-Lay was the result of a merger between two different producers of salty snacks. PepsiCo Inc. was clear as to what type of diversification strategy to use‚ and when to diversify. Their first strategy
Premium
Economics Coke vs. Pepsi: An Economic Analysis Rebecca Simmons Managerial Economics Dr Sol Drescher December 4‚ 2012 Executive Summary In this case study we will do an economic analysis of two major competitors; Coke® and Pepsi®. We will look at the history of these to competitive giants and discuss how they have evolved over the years to become rivals in the 21st Century. In this case study we will also look at
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
Case Study: Coke and Pepsi in India: Coca-Cola controlled the Indian market until 1977‚ when the Janata Party beat the Congress Party of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. To punish Coca-Cola’s principal bottler‚ a Congress Party stalwart and longtime Gandhi supporter‚ the Janata government demanded that Coca-Cola transfer its syrup formula to an Indian subsidiary. Coca-Cola balked and withdrew from the country. India‚ now left without both Coca-Cola and Pepsi‚ became a protected market. In the
Premium Indira Gandhi Coca-Cola India
Project submitted on MARKETING STRATEGIES OF PEPSI Page | 1 CONTENTS SR. NO. TOPIC PAGE NO. 4 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 11 11 12 12 11 11 12 14 15 16 17 19 19 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 25 25 26 26 27 28 28 29 29 30 31 32 33 Page | 2 I PepsiCo Mission…………………………………………………………… II A Brief Pepsi History ……………………………………………………... III Corporate Profile: PepsiCo In India………………………………………. 3.1 Origin Of PepsiCo India………………………………………… 3.2 From Joint Venture To Wholly Owned………………………… 3.3 Corporate Management..........
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola
PEPSI CO. CONTENTS: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Brief history 2.2 Current financial status 3. MISSION STATEMENT 4.1 Mission statement 4.2 Revised mission statement 4. VISION STATEMENT 5.3 Vision statement 5.4 Revised mission statement 5. EFE MATRIX 6.5 EFE matrix 6.6 EFE matrix summary 6. CPM MATRIX 7.7 CPM matrix 7.8 CPM matrix summary 7. IFE MATRIX 8.9 IFE matrix 8.10 IFE matrix summary
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
1. The following listed factors made PepsiAmericas to adopt a more aggressive attitude towards the utilization of transaction data to run the business. * Growth in product variety from 35-40 to nearly 400‚ * Lowering of PAS profit margins‚ * Recession in U.S economy‚ * Decline of U.S market for carbonated soft drinks‚ * National Clients like CVS‚ Wal-Mart and Mobil Gas Stations preference of highly centralized procurement arrangements‚ * Hard to track product flow on various
Premium Management Supply chain management Decision support system
Pepsi One PepsiCo‚ along with Coca-Cola‚ are two firms dominating the U.S beverage market with almost 76% collectively in 1998.This rivalry became more serious as PepsiCo released Pepsi One in order to increase its market. By properly applying the market audit‚ Pepsi One has succeeded in expanding the market‚ considered as a Pepsi core displays. Business structures of rivals‚ PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are virtually similar. As customers demand delicious products‚ firms have turned to marketing service
Premium Marketing Cola Coca-Cola